Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Phoenix Arts and Entertainment LA Trends Examiner
LA Trends Examiner

Watchmen: the pre-backlash begins

March 5, 7:12 AMLA Trends ExaminerChris Farnsworth
Comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the LA Trends Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

LA Times film critic Kenneth Turan did not care for "Watchmen," calling it "next to impossible to recreate [the book] on-screen."

Alan Moore was right. There isn't a movie in his landmark graphic novel "Watchmen" -- at least not a really good one. What we get instead is something acceptable but pedestrian, an adaptation that is more a prisoner of its story than the master of it.

(It's worth noting that while Turan, like other critics, complains about the over-the-top violence of "Watchmen," he fell all over himself to praise "Gomorrah," an overlong, dull and exceptionally bloody pseudo-documentary about Italian crime families. To be fair, however, he did love "The Dark Knight.")

This is all starting to sound like pre-backlash to me; people staking their right to say they predicted the movie was bad before it was cool to do so, the kind of contrarian, double-reverse-psychology the media loves in itself these days.

But the critical reception is secondary to the big guessing game: how much cash will "Watchmen" make? The Times wonders if "Watchmen" will make enough money -- whatever amount that is -- to count as a success after all the hype:

Taken together, the data suggest that the film's opening weekend grosses could trail "300's" opening mark, with "Watchmen" perhaps debuting with sales of about $60 million, executives at rival studios estimated. And if the 2-hour, 43-minute film is going to benefit from word of mouth, "Watchmen" will need to generate better moviegoer recommendations than it has been getting from trade newspaper reviewers and magazine critics.

Whatever else can be said about "Watchmen" -- and believe me, there's still way too much that will be said -- it's a massive, risky film that was never supposed to make it to the screen. When the book first hit stands, the only superhero in theaters was Superman in "Superman IV: Quest for Peace." If you had said someone would make a movie out of Alan Moore's and Dave Gibbon's work, they would have laughed you out of the room.

Now people are arguing mainly about how true the movie is to the comic, and how many millions of dollars it will make. So yeah, that's progress. 

More About: movies · Watchmen movie

Add a Comment

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Recent Articles

Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Times are hard, even for super-villains. Jon Hamm -- of TV's "Mad Men," but you're probably more likely to recognize him from his guest …
Friday, March 6, 2009
Today's the day. Five minutes to midnight, and all the agents and superhuman crew round up everyone who knows more than they do.That's right, …

Things to see and do

Langhorne Slim
09 Nov 2009 - 7 pm
Rhythm Room, The
More music »
Used, The
Marquee Theatre
Chinese Stars, The
Rhythm Room, The