I have, as many Americans, been ambivalent about prosecuting those officials who authorized or promoted acts of torture on behalf of my country over the past eight years or so. On the one hand, I found it impossible to believe that the highest government officials, in the legislative and executive, along with the military could suggest, approve or countenance torture as an official policy of the United States; it was far easier to treat the acknowledged acts of prisoner mistreatment and torture as President Bush stated on May 24
th, 2004, “[The prison at] Abu Ghraib were symbols of death and torture. That same prison became a symbol of disgraceful conduct by a few American troops who dishonored our country and disregarded our values.” Moreover, we were told, and I and many accepted, that any excesses were, in the words of New York Times’ Frank Rich, “If our country committed torture, surely it did so to prevent Armageddon, in a patriotic ticking-time-bomb scenario out of ’24’.”
We now know, not guess or assume, but know of a certainty that our beliefs and myths were false. The United States through the highest echelons of military and civilian government engaged in activities that are contrary to the very ideals and standards that make our nation and people unique and strong. (The defense posed by former Vice President Chaney and his refusal to leave the public stage and the contrary position of President Obama on the issues of torture is instructive and will be discussed in a subsequent post.)
For the past five years we have had the knowledge of American torture. Within the past weeks, the Justice Department released four memoranda describing these acts. We have to accept the truth that torture was not done by low level “grunts” it was authorized and directed by the highest of higher-ups.
And what was the motive? To save us from another 9-11? To prevent world-wide terror? No, it seems well documented that the Bush administration resorted to torture to establish a link between the 9-11 attack and Iraq, so as to justify the invasion of that country. We now know that there was no such link, that al Qaeda had little or no influence or presence in Iraq (until we invaded and occupied that country).
The memoranda and articles cited below indicate without a doubt that, notwithstanding the self-promoting and attempts to justify the unjustifiable rants of Mr. Chaney, that the acts of torture were unsuccessful, instituted for immoral and deceitful reasons and cannot be permitted to go unanswered.
To pretend otherwise is a repudiation of our country’s ideals and removes any moral or ethical standards that make us unique.
For more info: http://documents.nytimes.com/justice-department-memos-on-interrogation-techniques#p=1
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/04/17/us/politics/20090417-interrogation-techniques.html
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/04/16/world/20090416-memo-profiles.html
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22614