Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Charlotte Politics Tampa Politics Examiner
Tampa Politics Examiner

Florida voters approve same-sex prohibition, and more

November 7, 4:44 AMTampa Politics ExaminerJim Stillman
Comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Tampa Politics Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

Florida voters went “blue” and chose the Democratic candidates, as anticipated due to the vote along the I-4 corridor and especially in Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties on the west coast. At the same time, the voters approved a Constitutional amendment

"In as much as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized." [Emphasis supplied]

As had been explained in an earlier post, the emphasized phrase has created confusion and has, in effect, forced subsequent review and clarification by the courts. This is a development that is ordinary anathema to Conservatives.   Florida already has a statute, § 741.212, Florida Statutes enacted in 1997, provides, in relevant part

 Marriages between persons of the same sex entered into in any jurisdiction, not recognized for any purpose in this state. . . [T]he term "marriage" means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife,
So why was the amendment so important to its supporters and why does it bother many day and heterosexual people? Why did it pass in a state that has turned “blue?” Perhaps much can be explained by the material offered by each side.
The proponents of the amendment advertised it as one to prevent same-sex marriage in the event a future Florida Supreme Court invalidated § 741.212. 
 
Those opposed to the amendment cited the “substantial equivalent” wording as to forbid contractual granting by governmental agencies and private employers of survivor pension rights and extended medical insurance coverage to gay and unmarried heterosexual couples.
 
In 2001, City of Tampa police officer Lois Marrero was killed in the line of duty; her ten-year relationship partner, Tampa police Officer Mickie Mashburn, was denied surviving pension benefits. Three years later, the City of Tampa joined with a number of Florida cities and counties and private companies, such as Walt Disney World, the St. Petersburg Times and others in extending benefits to unmarried individuals in committed long-term relationships.
 
Moreover, especially in Florida, many seniors, now widowed, elect to live together unable to marry without loss of social security benefits.
 
The issue will likely have to be resolved in the courts by those “activist” judges who are the bane of the far Right.
 
 

 


Add a Comment

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Tuesday, June 9, 2009
 
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
SLB has submitted her opening statement in which she takes issue with some of my views. To make matters clearer for the readers of these points of …

If you are interested in my points of view, generally, checkout

In addition to adding comments to these articles, readers may...

  • Email criticisms and accolades to jstillman@iqzero.net
  • Check out advertisers on this page