Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
National Careers and Workplace Workplace Law Examiner
Workplace Law Examiner

St. Paul employer agrees to prayer breaks for Muslim employees

November 13, 10:08 AMWorkplace Law ExaminerMarcia McCormick
3 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Workplace Law Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

 

In what may be the first settlement in the country securing prayer rights, a federal district court in St. Paul, Minn., last Friday preliminarily approved consent decrees that settle two religious discrimination and retaliation lawsuits brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against St. Cloud, Minn.-based chicken processor, Gold’n Plump Poultry, Inc., and an employment agency, The Work Connection, which referred workers to it.

Under the decree Gold'n Plump will add, for one area of its plants, a paid break during the second half of each shift in addition to a break early in the shift and lunch breaks it had been providing as required by law. The additional break will accommodate the religious beliefs of Muslim employees who wish to pray during the course of the work day. The timing of the breaks will fluctuate during the year to coordinate with the religious timing for Muslim prayers, which is governed in part by sunrise and sunset. The employer had allowed floating breaks to some of its employees previously, but this system had not worked in the employees' view. Gold'n Plump has also agreed to pay $215,000 to a class of Muslims who may have been disciplined or discharged when they took breaks to pray.

The Work Connection, which referred workers to Gold'n Plump, has agreed to pay $150,000 to the class for requiring applicants to sign a form stating that they would not refuse to handle pork in the course of their jobs and for turning away workers who refused. The Work Connection will no longer use that form and will offer placement at Gold’n Plump to job seekers previously turned away for refusing to sign the form.

This is an important religious accommodation case for a group that the EEOC has been particularly concerned about discrimination against for some time.

For more info: The EEOC's press release on the cases can be found here, and an article in the Minneapolis-St.Paul Star Tribune can be found here.
More About: Important Cases

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Recent Articles

Thursday, March 12, 2009
The Nebraska Supreme Court recently issued a very important decision in State v. Henderson, a case involving labor law and the First Amendment. Robert …
Thursday, March 12, 2009
The Center for Corporate Equality has issued an in-depth study, entitled, A Review of OFCCP Enforcement Statistics: A Call for Transparency in OFCCP …