Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Louisville Society and Culture Anti-Establishment Examiner
Anti-Establishment Examiner

Interracial couple denied marriage license - proof the legal institution of marriage is oppressive

October 20, 2:29 PMAnti-Establishment ExaminerJennifer Chou
5 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Anti-Establishment Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

Mass wedding ceremony in Guangzhou, China
Mass wedding ceremony in Guangzhou, China
Ap Photo

Terence McKay and Beth Humphrey-McKay, an interracial couple, were denied a marriage license by a justice of the peace in Louisiana.  The justice, Keith Bardwell, claimed that he was not racist, but did not believe in issuing marriage licenses to interracial couples. He said, "I have one problem with mixed race marriages and that is the offspring."  See the full story here.

The McKays have since been married by someone else, but seek to have Bardwell removed from his position. Bardwell feels that he has done nothing wrong and refuses to apologize. He told CNN, "It's kind of hard to apologize for something that you really and truly feel down in your heart you haven't done  wrong." At least he is honest.

Although the couple is now happily married, this situation is a perfect example of why the legal institution of marriage is oppressive and tyrannical. Whereas in more enlightened countries, marriage is the private contract between two people who love each other, in the United States, legal marriage has created all kinds of social injustices.

The marriage license system first arose because the government wanted to hinder interracial marriages, and keep track of those who were getting married to people of a different race.

It seems that not much has changed. In addition, legal marriage is now also used to discriminate against gays, and is essential to a discriminatory taxation system that taxes single people differently than married people.

If marriage were a private contract, the protections that exist in legal marriage would still stand as contractual agreements between two parties, but there would be no discrimination as to who can marry whom.

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Monday, December 7, 2009
The Washington Post has called Above the Law, a blog devoted to news and gossip about the legal profession of law a "must-read legal blog." …
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Nick Tennant, 24, founded Med Grow Cannabis College in Southfield, Michigan. The college is a trade school for aspiring marijuana growers, and covers …