Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
New Orleans Politics SF Libertarian Examiner
SF Libertarian Examiner

Dianne Feinstein in hot water again

April 21, 11:40 AMSF Libertarian ExaminerJustin Clarke
13 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the SF Libertarian Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

 
 

Dianne Feinstein certainly knows how to work the system. Feinstein served as San Francisco’s first (and so far only) female mayor, and is now our State’s Senior Senator. She has come under scrutiny in the past due to the fact that her husband is quite a heavyweight in winning government contracts.  She's been in trouble for this kind of thing before.  Today however, according to the Washington Times:

Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced legislation to route $25 billion in taxpayer money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband's real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at compensation rates higher than the industry norms.

How much higher? If we read on we find that:

Under the FDIC contract, CBRE charges a $5,000 sales commission for each property and can collect an additional $2,500 incentive fee if they sell it in under six months. In other words, they can collect as much as $7,500 on the sale of a property worth $25,000 or less - which works out to a sales commission of 30 percent or more.

The entire article is well worth a read, and not just because there are legitimate questions about who knew what, and when they knew it.  My personal favorite line in the entire article comes from Milt Shaw, who (according to the article) is senior vice president of LPS Asset Management Solutions, managing nearly 20,000 foreclosed properties for banks and other clients. Shaw said the compensation package was “a little egregious.” A little egregious? What does that mean? This situation is a just a smidgen unbelievably terrible?

I think that Milt Shaw is quite brave for making the accusation at all, even with the neutering qualifier he manages to slip in. In a market that is increasingly under the thumb of federal bureaucrats, you might think it makes more sense to initiate the kind of ring-kissing that Allstate’s CEO recently undertook in his NYT opinion piece “Regulate Me, Please.” Or maybe Milt Shaw knows that since he isn’t the third husband of a career bureaucrat, he probably won’t be getting much of that sweetheart business anyway. 

 

More About: Economic Policy

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Inside 'New Moon'
Get inside info on all things New Moon.
Robert Pattinson | Taylor Lautner

Recent Articles

Thursday, November 5, 2009
Tuesday it looked as if the tide had turned against the Obama Administration and the Democratic Party.* For starters, there was the election (from the …
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
The Obama administration scaled back the drug war on Monday, though by how much is still questionable: A Justice Department memo, sent Monday to …

Things to see and do

Preservation Hall Jazz Band
25 Nov 2009 - 8 pm
Preservation Hall
More music »
D-Day Beaches, The
National World War II Museum