Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Detroit Politics Albuquerque Libertarian Examiner
Albuquerque Libertarian Examiner

Competing, voluntary governments could be better choice

June 17, 11:13 PMAlbuquerque Libertarian ExaminerKent McManigal
1 comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Albuquerque Libertarian Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

In a comment a couple of days ago, MamaLiberty spoke of the Constitution establishing a non-voluntary government.  That is true.  People seem to accept, on the whole, that government is necessarily non-voluntary.  At least if you get rid of the nonsense about voting making government "of the people".  Government, as it now exists, is a coercive monopoly.

But why should government be non-voluntary?  Why not let people choose among competing governments?  If it is good enough for us where cell phone companies or insurance providers are concerned, why not governments too?  Some people would scream about those who refuse to sign on with ANY government, if given a choice.  Well, what about those people who refuse a government?  If government is so wonderful, why would anyone refuse?  If, as is so often claimed, governments benefit those who live under them, people would be clamoring to sign on with some government, right?  Especially if you could choose the features you want.  Or, if governments really give no benefits, or if the liabilities outweigh the benefits, maybe it is time for governments to change or go out of business. 

If a government can arise that can compete, and prosper, others would adopt the good parts of that one while trying to improve upon the model.  Want your government to provide welfare?  Fine, but you will bear the cost, as your government can't "tax" anyone not on their client list.  Want to keep all your money all your working life, but collect some equivalent of Social Security in your old age instead of planning ahead?  Too late to switch when you retire, unless the welfare-doling government's clients will let you join and live off of them now.

I still prefer good old self-government.  The only kind that has ever worked, or ever will.

More About: scenarios

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Recent Articles

Monday, November 23, 2009
I have made an observation that is sure to be disputed by statists, but it is an observation made with my own eyes nonetheless. "Laws" …
Saturday, November 21, 2009
"Hate crimes". Is there any more ridiculous concept? If something is wrong to do, your hatred as motivation for doing it doesn't make it …

Things to see and do

Less Than Jake
23 Nov 2009 - 6 pm
Saint Andrew's Hall
More music »
Blind Pilot
Ark, The