Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Louisville Politics Grassroots Politics Examiner
Grassroots Politics Examiner

ACLU of Montana defends parents’ and children’s rights

April 19, 7:20 AMGrassroots Politics ExaminerRon Moore
Comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Grassroots Politics Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


 

 

The Montana Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a legal appeal that could set precedent for whether children have a right to maintain relationships with both their parents after a break-up.
 
“We are in court today to guarantee that the two children Michelle Kulstad and Barbara Maniaci raised together are able to have a relationship with both of their parents,” said American Civil Liberties Union of Montana Legal Director Betsy Griffing. “It would be cruel to these children if they were barred from spending time with Michelle and from continuing to receive the love and support she has shown them since they entered her home. We hope this case establishes a precedent that a biological or adoptive parent cannot shut out a co-parent’s relationship with their children simply because it has become inconvenient.”
 
The Montana District Court ruled last fall that Kulstad was entitled to joint custody of the two children she raised with former partner Maniaci. Maniaci appealed the decision, bringing the case to the Supreme Court.
 
In the district court trial, an expert appointed by the Court to do a parenting evaluation of Kulstad and Maniaci described the strong parental bonds between the children and Kulstad. The expert also testified that the children could be mentally and emotionally harmed if Maniaci were permitted to sever their relationship with Kulstad.
 
Montana law recognizes the importance of maintaining a parent-child relationship, and that such a relationship arises not only through the birth or documented adoption of a child, but also when certain strict criteria are met by clear and convincing evidence. The court recognizes a person as a parent when:
 
  • The person shows that he or she provided for the day-to-day physical and emotional needs of a child by providing food, shelter, clothing, care, education and discipline;
  • The child’s adoptive/birth parent allowed and intended for the parent-child relationship to develop; and
  • It is in the child’s best interests to recognize and continue the parent-child relationship.
They assert that Michelle Kulstad clearly meets all these requirements.
 
“After arguments today, we are feeling optimistic that the Montana Supreme Court will agree that it is in the children’s best interests to maintain their relationship with Michelle,” Griffing said.

Add a Comment

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Monday, December 14, 2009
From collaboration with Communist China to stopping at nothing to prevent workers from partnering with their employers; the U.S. Chamber of Commerce …
Thursday, December 3, 2009
The corrupt business culture that encourages managers to treat workers as the enemy has infected the nation’s blood supply. Since Ronald Reagan …