Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Omaha Arts and Entertainment Wilmington Movie Examiner
Wilmington Movie Examiner

Oscars vs. Golden Globes: The Honorary Award Difference

November 23, 11:49 AMWilmington Movie ExaminerBernardo Villela
Comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Wilmington Movie Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


Martin Scorsese

It is interesting to note that two honorary awards were announced in close proximity to one another and they draw an interesting distinction between the Golden Globes and Academy Awards.

Martin Scorsese will receive the Cecil B. DeMille Award from the Golden Globes and storied Cinematographer Gordon Willis, best known from his work on the Godfather series and many of Woody Allen's best films, will receive an honorary Oscar.

Scorsese has been nominated for the Golden Globe as Best Director 7 times and won twice for Gangs of New York and The Departed. He was also nominated as a screenwriter. It is the Oscar that long eluded him and thankfully he got it. Meanwhile, Gordon Willis amongst the most revered men in his craft has only been nominated twice and never won.

There is a vast chasm between the importance assigned to each award given the respective natures of the Hollywood Foreign Press and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences but how come there are people that should have won in the past getting honorary Oscars and people who have already won are being honored at the Golden Globes? Food for thought.


Add a Comment

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Vancouver 2010
Get exclusive coverage from Examiners on the Winter Games in Vancouver.
2010 Valentine Guide
Single, married or something in between? Find what you need for Valentine's Day.

Recent Articles

Tuesday, February 9, 2010
As mentioned previously, Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson is the kind of performer that has surprisingly grown on me; however, the man is far too …
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
One can never really analyze all of international film during a given decade given the enormous scope and the amount of films released worldwide in …

Bernardo Villela's Rating Scale

  1. = Terrible, no redeeming qualities, one of the worst films ever made.
  2. =Awful but of some minute value- one of the worst of the year but probably not of all-time.
  3. =A film with one maybe two strong elements but overall unforgivably poor.
  4. =A film with a few mistakes too big to overlook.
  5. =Marginally bad, a film with it's good points but ultimately suffering from a fatal flaw that prevents it from achieving decency.
  6. =A mediocre film; not bad but nothing special.
  7. =Better than average, definitely worth viewing.
  8. =A standout film with promise that is not quite fullfilled.
  9. =A film which is just an iota, a minor fix or two short of greatness.
  10. =A great film. Best genre can achieve, contender for best of year & rarely all-time. There are gradations in all ratings.

Good Movies You Only Need to See Once

  • The Passion of the Christ

Movies That Should Be Shot As Originally Written

  • The Village
  • Legend
  • Greed
  • Dr. Doolittle
  • Vampyr
  • The Magnificent Ambersons
  • Suspicion
  • Mr. Arkadin