
courtesy PhotoBucket
Sex: the thing that takes up the least amount of time and causes the most amount of trouble. - attributed to John Barrymore
The ongoing news coverage that David Letterman had an affair with a staffer brings up the question that we should be asking ourselves every time we hear of a public figure who has “strayed.”
Why do we care about who is having sex with whom and why do we want all the salacious details that go with that information? How is it that our culture in the
This past year we have read about two politicians who made headlines by cheating on their spouses. The stories were messy and condemning, with public outcries for their resignations from political office. While as a journalist I understand why the public wants to read about the affairs and all the gory details,(we are all human after all), even as I write about it, I still see it as a tragic issue that should be between the people who are directly involved and adversely affected by the affairs. I also don’t think having an affair automatically makes you unfit to hold office. Were that the case, the world would have lost some very excellent leaders in the political arena.
Men like Dwight Eisenhower, all the Kennedy men, and Bill Clinton. Hell, let’s go all the way back to men like Julius Caesar and Alexander the Great. Let’s even include women who were brilliant politicians, rulers and warriors such as Cleopatra, Eleanor of Aquitaine, and Catherine the Great. Whether male or female, their sex lives did not call into question their ability to get the job done. It had nothing to do with ability to lead.
The only reason the public should get involved is if taxpayer money has been spent for personal sexual favors or assignations. Then the politician or leader has overstepped the boundaries of decorum and done damage to his elected office. Whether we see an extramarital affair as morally reprehensible or not should not matter. Sexual immorality does not take away from one’s ability to do good for the public. Financial misconduct, such as using your office as a means for political favors or monetary gain, misuse of funds for personal pleasure; all that should make the public rightfully cry out for a swift resignation. Not sex for heaven’s sake!
I realize that there will be people who will disagree with this columnist and you are certainly entitled to your opinion and to express that opinion. Please understand that the same right applies to me so please be mature in your comments. But morality, barring some very unbreakable moral societal rules of conduct, has always seemed to be something that is uniquely individual. An anonymous quote from the 17th century about morality as it refers to religious debates on life states that view clearly.
“My morals may not be the same as yours, but they are just as valid.”
Then too there is the quote from the Roman orator Cicero:
“I have found that those who profess morality to be among the least moral of men."
Perhaps it is time to take a step back from our own media voyeurism and think about what we are doing and why. Why, unless personally or monetarily affected should we care what two consenting adults do ? A misguided libido should not automatically make a person unfit for everything else.
***© 2009 all rights reserved Kristen Houghton The above articles may not be rewritten, copied, published, broadcast, or redistributed, wholly or in any part, without the express written permission of Kristen Houghton.
.jpg)
Do you sabotage your own happiness in order to make other people in your life happy? Learn how to put your own life first! Read Kristen Houghton's new book, "AND THEN I'LL BE HAPPY!" due in stores in Fall 2009. Pre-order it today. Available at Barnes and Noble, Borders, Amazon, and all bookstores
For the latest on relationships subscribe to Kristen Houghton’s column. Email Kristen