Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Columbia Arts and Entertainment SF Classical Music Examiner
This article is part of San Francisco's Great Recession
SF Classical Music Examiner

A Brahms of ghosts and shadows

June 23, 3:06 PMSF Classical Music ExaminerStephen Smoliar
Comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the SF Classical Music Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

Johannes Brahms
Johannes Brahms

For those who have been following in my "chamber music on a budget" footsteps, today's Noontime Concerts™ recital at Old St. Mary's Cathedral by pianist Miles Graber, violinist Mariya Borozina, and cellist Miriam Perkoff provided an excellent opportunity for comparative listening.  Their performance of Johannes Brahms' second piano trio, Opus 87, in C major provided an excellent complement to last month's performance of the first trio, Opus 8, in B major by the MusicAEterna trio (for which Graber serves as pianist) at the Old First Church.  However, the comparison may well lead many listeners in unanticipated directions;  because, in spite of its usually "upbeat" key, the later trio is as cold and dark as the earlier one is warm and comforting.

This may perplex those with more conventional expectations.  How can Brahms find so much darkness in C major and so much warmth in B major?  I suppose the answer is that, while Johann Sebastian Bach may have exploited different "character traits" from different keys, based on the underlying logics of their different intervallic relations, Brahms' use of equally-divided intervals allowed him to make key choices primarily on the basis of what he wanted the hands to do, leaving matters of those character traits to rhetorical strategy.  In the case of that second trio, that rhetorical strategy involves different approaches to concealment.  For example, the piano never gets to state the very opening theme of the first movement until the end of that movement.  In the Scherzo movement, while the trio section settles comfortably into primary cadences, it is embraced by outer sections of flittering gestures that dart by before the ear can really grasp them;  and that same relation between the evanescent and the startlingly clear also pervades the final movement.  Brahms may not quite be Dominic Flandry, Poul Anderson's Knight of Ghosts and Shadows;  but the rhetoric of this second piano trio is definitely ghostly and shadowy!

Graber, Borozina, and Perkoff certainly had no trouble honoring this rhetorical strategy.  Their technical command of the score was all that it should have been, allowing those primary cadences to jump out of the shadows right in the spirit (pun intended) of the composition.  Ironically, this was one of those wonderful sunny days in San Francisco, contrasting as much with the Brahms trio as that cold Sunday afternoon had contrasted with the performance of Opus 8.  Given the contentious sort that Brahms was, his own ghost was probably pleased with both of these contrasts!

Add a Comment

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Music from 1919 was the title of the Faculty Artist Series recital given last night by violist Jodi Levitz with her accompanist Keisuke Nakagoshi at …
Monday, December 7, 2009
Those who read my account last week about George Benjamin's visit to the San Francisco Symphony for one of their Project San Francisco events may …