RSS
Home
The Politics of Life
Print
Email
RSS
Subscribe
.jpg)
Yesterday I touched on the change in direction of Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, in his support for Senator John McCain. For those of you who missed it, here is what Dobson said about supporting McCain only 5 months ago:
“I am convinced Sen. McCain is not a conservative, and in fact, has gone out of his way to stick his thumb in the eyes of those who are. He has at times sounded more like a member of the other party…Given these and many other concerns, a spoonful of sugar does not make the medicine go down. I cannot, and I will not, vote for Sen. John McCain, as a matter of conscience.”
Last Monday, on his radio show, Dobson announced a potential change in support for John McCain by stating “I never thought I would hear myself saying this…While I am not endorsing Senator John McCain, the possibility is there that I might.” What has caused the change of heart for Dobson: quite simply, a lack of a suitable alternative.
Dobson’s switch is a microcosm of a larger problem for evangelicals who believe in the sanctity of life; what is more important, a reduction of the number of abortions in other countries or the promise of an end of the war in Iraq? Will either McCain or Obama appoint justices to the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade? No. What is the criterion this year for voting for the pro-life (anti-abortion) candidate?
It may come down to which candidate will allow federal funds to be used for abortions. Every change of party in the White House over the last 30 years has included an Executive Order either allowing or forbidding the use of tax payer funds to pay for abortions (Reagan – 1984, 1988) (Clinton 1993) (Bush 2001). Obama, who is endorsed by NARAL, will probably issue an Executive Order to provide funding for international family planning groups who provide abortions. McCain will probably keep the current funding restrictions in place during his presidency.
If there is no realistic chance of overturning Roe v. Wade, then what constitutes the preservation of life for evangelicals in 2008: perhaps ending the war in Iraq? As far as the war in Iraq is concerned, Obama has gone on record to say he favors an earlier withdrawal of American troops. McCain’s staff and surrogates are not sure which policy is better for their candidate. If you are an evangelical supporter of a pro-life platform the question may come down to the following: Is saving the lives of American soldiers and Iraqi nationals more important than continuing a funding ban on abortions that primarily affects other countries? Pro-life v. Pro-peace…one of the tough decisions of Election 2008!
For more info on Executive Orders and Abortions: click here.
More About:
2008 Election ·
James Dobson ·
Focus on the Family ·
Barack Obama ·
John McCain ·
Executive Orders ·
Abortion Ban
Related Articles:
Comments
I just found out that Oral Roberts passed away at the age of 91. I never sent him any money, or attended any of his crusades, but I liked listening to …
Having read the transcript of the President’s Nobel Peace Prize, and his mentioning of his rationale for Just War in Afghanistan, I wonder if …
