Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Washington DC Politics SF City Hall Examiner
SF City Hall Examiner

Food labeling and committee fun

October 16, 10:38 AMSF City Hall ExaminerMelissa Griffin
1 comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the SF City Hall Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

Between the Lines – Patty Label

(Note to self: My Patti LaBelle reference is too obscure.)

You may recall that the California Restaurant Association filed a lawsuit to stop the enforcement of the City’s food-labeling ordinance. Enacted on March 24, that ordinance mandates that all restaurants with 20 or more locations in California prominently display calories, saturated fat, carbohydrates and sodium for each menu item in locations within San Francisco. The resturant association argued (correctly, I think) that California state law already covers the issue of food labeling, which makes the local law unenforceable.

While the matter was being litigated, the state legislature passed and the Governor signed Senate Bill 1420, which requires restaurants with 20 or more locations in California to display calorie content on menus and provide nutritional information about carbohydrates, protein,et al. elsewhere. (Bill here: Download SB1420.pdf.) It also contains an explicit provision that local governments can't pass laws on the subject of nutritional labeling at restaurants. (Sec. 2(J).) The judge hasn’t officially ruled yet on the effect of the CA law on the lawsuit. But you can bet that the SF law will be null and void leaving the CA law - which will require much (but not all) of the same thing. The state law will go into effect July 1, 2009.

So, in a few months, as you trip over a pothole whilst walking past that homeless person who sleeps near the apartment you can barely afford, at least you’ll know how many calories are in that burger you just ate.

This Week in Committee

The Board of Supervisors didn’t meet this week, but there’s still fun to be had at City Hall. Today at 1 p.m., there is a meeting of the City Operations and Neighborhood Services Committee. Here are a few agenda items:

1. A hearing on the abuse of disabled parking placards, because nothing makes people do evil things like lack of parking. (Download disabled_placards.pdf.)

2. Codification of Proposition K, passed in 2007, which limits advertising on public property. Now can we get rid of the Carole Migden billboards? Pretty please? (Download advertising_limitations.pdf.)

3. A hearing on the cutbacks in street cleaning from once per week to twice per month in certain areas of districts 1, 2, 4, 7 and 8. Expect everything from multimedia presentations to fisticuffs about this one. I can’t wait! (Download street_sweeping_reduction_reso_2.doc.)

--Melissa

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Holiday Guide
Examiners spread the seasonal cheer with the Examiner.com Holiday Guide.

Recent Articles

Thursday, December 10, 2009
On Nov. 10, the Board of Supervisors overrode Mistermayor’s veto of a new sanctuary policy that protects undocumented juveniles who are arrested …
Thursday, December 10, 2009
"The worst idea is to go out there, pick winners and losers, and say, ‘Here’s what we’re gonna do: Go through a three- or …