Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Bruno bristles at the claim.
"The moral justification for evicting him is that he never contacted them," Bruno said. "He handed a check to the building site manager in mid-March. If that's not contacting them, what is?"
Carpenter, however, maintains she did her due diligence and exhausted all reasonable means of trying to bring Kulek into the process, Failing, she went to the property management playbook and handed the matter over to the attorneys. The wheels of eviction started turning and didn't stop until Kulek was bounced into the street.
"Eviction is always regrettable, and always a last resort," Carpenter said, distancing the CCDC from other landlords who often look at eviction, especially the Ellis Act variety, as a full contact sport. "It's in our interest to keep tenants in our buildings, to keep the continuity."
One of the problems in this case, Carpenter said, is that Kulek lacked an advocate, someone who would have helped him head off trouble in the first place. She acknowledged that Kulek's psychological condition may have played a role in his mysterious disappearing act.
In Bruno, Kulek has found his advocate.
"This is not a tempest in a teapot," Bruno said. "This is a tempest in a tempest. There's something going on here."
Bruno said that because of Kulek's illness, he was an easy target for eviction.
"He's been in jail. He's been in asylums. How easy is it for them to intimidate somebody like him? He told me he was afraid to go to court," Bruno said. "No judge, based on what I know about this case, would have evicted the man under these circumstances."
Bruno and Carpenter also disagreed over the chronology and context of events. Bruno recounted a chance meeting on the street last week with Carpenter and CCDC executive director Gordon Chin, where they discussed Kulek's case. According to Bruno, Chin said he would welcome Kulek back, without being overly committal. Carpenter said the meeting took place in the CCDC offices on Grant Avenue, and Chin merely introduced the two before excusing himself to attend to other matters.
Bruno, like a lot of other advocates who work with San Francisco's poor, was generally complimentary of CCDC's efforts, but said the agency erred badly in deciding to pursue this eviction.
Kulek was not a troublesome tenant, Bruno said, adding a nonprofit agency that receives something like $18 million a year from the city to provide housing for at-risk, in-need tenants should not handle its affairs like a traditional landlord. Bruno does volunteer work for St. Vincent de Paul, another nonprofit that also provides low-cost rental housing. "Our policy is to give one year and two months notice when we evict," he said.
Because the CCDC owns and manages many types of SRO housing, from senior to Section 8 to tax-credit units, it will be interesting to see where Kulek lands if taken back. His unit at the Concorcia was no SRO; Carpenter described it as a full studio, containing its own kitchen and bathroom.
This is clearly a situation with no winners, only losers. The CCDC, a nonprofit that develops and manages affordable housing in the northeast corner of town, and, by most accounts is very good at what it does, gains nothing from this kind of public relations fiasco. The city itself has enough people on the street who need help. The biggest loser, Kulek, remains hospitalized. St. Francis has no intention of releasing him until they see a lease from the CCDC guaranteeing Kulek a place to shelter.
"Mark saved his life," Bruno said of patrolman Alvarez. He did, so now it's time for the CCDC to step up and save a little face.


