Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
.jpg)
Cap and Trade Systems have good intentions as a way to efficiently limit greenhouse gas emissions. The problem with these schemes is that they can raise costs without generating the expected reduction in emissions. One problem with most of these schemes is they allow additional credits to be generated.
For example, let’s say a utility company wants to burn more coal in this country. They buy a credit from a Chinese company by paying to install more energy efficient production equipment in a Chinese manufacturing plant. This reduces emissions from the plant, but does not reduce emissions. The electric utility in
Oh, but say you only allow trading for emission credits within this country or with other countries that also have limits on emissions. The utility company this time buys credits from a manufacturer in this country that reduces emissions by shutting down a manufacturing business. The product made in that plant is also made in
Schemes where the government sells emission credits are basically a tax on energy production. Again you could be forcing business off-shore to less energy efficient producers. You not only increase emissions, but loose jobs and hurt your economy.
It is interesting that both presidential candidates indicated that they would support the bill that was killed in the Senate. It would be better if our presidential candidates and congress spent more time promoting more of the cleanest energy we can produce. This includes not only wind and solar, but nuclear, natural gas, and even oil. These all produce less greenhouse gas emissions than coal.


