Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Albuquerque Politics Long Island Independent Examiner
Long Island Independent Examiner

New flu from WHO-ville

November 18, 12:16 AMLong Island Independent ExaminerThomas Cataldo
1 comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Long Island Independent Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

This is by far the best presentation I have seen by anyone on the swine flu.  Why?  Because the presenter is a nun and a medical doctor.  Can you get more credible than that?  This woman, TERESA FORCADES from Spain, brings up many excellent points with logic and clarity while citing top medical journals and organizations.  The video is almost an hour long and it is sub-titled so I have summarized the main points here.

Part 1 Background

  •  There are A, B & C type flu viruses, A is the seasonl flu.
  • Seasonal flu vaccine is a mixture of A & B.
  • Therefore the new A-H1N1 swine flu is NOT new.
  • This A-H1N1 is the same type as the 1918 flu that killed millions and then disappeared in the 1950's to reappear in 1977 according to the "New England Journal of Medicine."
  • The article in the "New England Journal of Medicine" confirms this fact and goes on to say that it re-appeared because it was resynthesized in a lab.
  • The body of a frozen Inuit woman from 1918 was exhumed and used for this purpose.
  • This year's new viral strain is S-OIV.
  • There have been 3,559 deaths world-wide from the new strain (April-Septemebr 2009) and this is a low mortality rate.
  • The National Medical Ethics Committee of France & The President of the General Spainish Medical Association have both confirmed that this new flu has a lower mortality rate than the seasonal flu.
  • People over 60 have a 33% immunity to the new flu.

 

Part 2 Baxter International and WHO

  • Investigative journalist Jane Burgermeister found out this past January 2009 that Baxter International, through it's Austrian subsidiary, released 72 kg of vaccine (thousands of doses) to 16 labs in four neighboring countries that contained a mixture of bird flu from 2005 with a high mortality but low transmission rate and seasonal flu with low mortality but high transmission rate. 
  • When you mix these two they could recombine into a lethal contagious virus.
  • The chances of mixing two live un-attenuated viruses is so low as to be near impossible.
  • Until such a time as these mix-ups have been throughly investigated I would not let anyone take a flu vaccine produced by Baxter, which is one of the companies retained by the government for this purpose.
  • Next, on April 29, 2009 WHO Director General Dr Margaret Chan announced a level 5 pandemic alert status and then on June 11, 2009 she raised it to (the highest) level 6 for the A-H1N1.
  • But with such a low mortality rate, how could she raise the pandemic alert, and why don't we have one every year since the seasonal flu has a higher mortality rate than A-H1N1?
  • The answer is that in May 2009 they (WHO) changed the definition of a pandemic to exclude the mortality factor!  We must understand the political ramifications of this change.
  •  The rules changed in 2005.  When WHO declares a pandemic it does not make recommendations, it gives orders!  So if they make a vaccine mandatory, a person who refuses it (refusniks) may be subject to fines and imprisonment.

 Part 3 Triple Novelty Vaccinations

  1.  Multiple live doses means that the complications are multiplied and this has never been tried before.
  2. The use of adjuvants has been denounced by the French Labor Union of Nurses (they are used to stimulate a higher immune system response.)  GSK now uses a stronger coadjuvant (polysorbate plus squalene) in it's vaccines which has been shown to produce serious side effects in Gulf  War soldiers.  Coadjuvants are used so they can use fewer antigens in order to increase production and vaccinate the entire world population.
  3. Pharmaceutical companies have been legally absolved by the US government from any liability arising from side effects of the vaccines.

So what is worse?  Staying home for a few days with a mild flu which has a very low mortality rate or a vaccine with documented risk of paralysis (Guillain-Barre) and other potentially very unpleasant side effects and no legal recourse ?

 Did I mention the trail of dead microbiologists?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

More About: Swine Flu · WHO

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Vancouver 2010
Get exclusive coverage from Examiners on the Winter Games in Vancouver.

Recent Articles

Wednesday, November 25, 2009
What does it say about America when the division between the people and the military-industrial-government-banking complex is so vast that citizens …
Monday, November 23, 2009
Here is the Polish Health minister addressing the Polish Parliament. Her speech is in Polish with sub-titles. I have summarized it here. Prof. …