Over the last few days it seems that every news station, newspaper, and millions of websites have devoted, almost exclusively, around the clock coverage of the rampage at Fort Hood. The events surrounding this tragedy are terrible, and one that will probably lead to even more laws being passed that will further restrict civil rights, another classic example of reaction versus pro-action.
In the wake of this murderous incident there are some very cynical questions that must be addressed-question that have yet to make it across mainstream media.
Why are the Federal Police services and Military Police the only people allowed to carry firearms on a sprawling military base?
Why are politicians, leaders, and news publications barred from using the words “Muslim” and “Terrorist” in the same sentence?
Most importantly is the question as to why the leadership of this country keep tip-toeing around trying to be nice to the people that hate American’s the most. In all of these occurrences the “powers that be” refused to call this case what it really was-a premeditated overt act of terrorism by a Muslim who had personally declared Jihad against American and it’s people”.
In nearly every case where a Muslim went on a rampage there were warning signs. These types of Muslims set out to kill as many people as they could, knowing that they would probably be killed in the process-but they went ahead anyway. It's called Jihad-no matter what the Politically Correct call it.
The President, on his first visit to Saudi Arabia, upon meeting that country’s king-bowed deeply at the waist to the very people that have hamstrung America since the inception of the words OPEC and Terrorist came into the American consciousness. That’s right-he “bowed” down like some sniveling servant. An act that set the tone, and continues to undermine the sentiments of many people down here on the streets of America.
It’s been reported that the White House Press Center also sent out letters to every news organization across the nation demanding that they refrain from using Terrorist and Muslim in the same context. Another unsubstantiated reported goes on to say that if these publishers didn’t adhere to the new rules-their FCC license and operating authority would be rescinded. Whether this report is true or not, would sustain the ever present philosophy of the Administration’s current attempt to sanitize heinous jihadist events such as what happened at Fort Hood.
Americans saw for themselves how the President acquiesced to the interests of Muslims, particularly the Wahabi’s, an oftentimes violent sect that openly decrees the destruction of all western nations, as well as members of The Council on American Islamic Relations (C.A.I.R.) whose membership includes some of the most radicalized and fiercest opponents against the American way of life-appointing many of them to sensitive government positions.
Recently a former FBI agent authored a book detailing the inability of government to address the intricacies of the Muslim equations within their own ranks (http://www.sperryfiles.com/). This book details from within, that the very system tasked with protecting Americans-can’t even protect themselves due to insane policies that have been shoved down their throats by a leadership administration who denies the fundamental realities of what radical Islam represents to America.
The events that were witnessed at Fort Hood could have been prevented in the first few minutes-had enough citizens been allowed to carry concealed firearms on the base itself. But, Federal law prevents legal gun owners, even those with a concealed firearms permit, from carrying or protecting themselves with private firearms on Federal property. Given the number of threats over the past few years against soldiers manning our military bases-this policy is yet another example of administrators that undertake to force a segment of the American population to accept their idea of citizen rights-by expunging basic tenants of Constitutional rights afforded under the 2nd Amendment-thereby allowing reprehensible individuals like Nidal Malik Hasan to perpetrate an act of terrorism in the name of Islam.
Law Enforcement and media outlets were barred from calling this event a “Terrorist Attack by a ”Muslim” through brainless “politically correct” policies perpetuated by an administration that seeks to sugarcoat this event for what it actually was-A Jihadist action by yet another America hating Muslim.
The sad reality is that this terrorist animal will be appointed the very best Trail Lawyers and Civil Rights attorneys that American tax payers can afford. A right that seems absurd, and a blatant slap in the face to the victims, and the surviving family members of the people that he killed.
It’s time to start calling these acts for what they actuality represent-instead of the administration’s sycophantic flattering allegiance to a benign principal of tolerance-that apologize to these terrorists and their self serving Wahabi masters for having caused them to hate us, and slaughter the people that make up America.