Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Cleveland Politics Austin Gun Rights Examiner
Austin Gun Rights Examiner

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox: Prohibition causes ‘organized crime violence’

May 23, 12:36 PMAustin Gun Rights ExaminerHoward Nemerov
6 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Austin Gun Rights Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use

  (Photo courtesy of Wikipedia)

ABC News reported that former Colorado congressman and Republican presidential candidate Tom Tancredo has acknowledged that the war on drugs has “failed.” Speaking to the Lincoln Club of Colorado, Tancredo said: "I am convinced that what we are doing is not working."
 
Tancredo was considered to be one of the most conservative members of Congress, with a lifetime 97.20 (out of 100) rating from the American Conservative Union.
 
Surprisingly, Tancredo has agreement from some very interesting sources. CNN reports that former Mexican president Vicente Fox said:
 
"I believe it's time to open the debate over legalizing drugs," he told CNN on Tuesday. "It must be done in conjunction with the United States, but it is time to open the debate."
He pointed to how the end of Prohibition in the United States in 1933 lessened organized crime violence.
"It can't be that the only way is for the state to use force," he said.
 
Mexico’s Fox was joined by his predecessor Ernesto Zedillo, and former Columbian president Cesar Gaviria, who said: "The problem is that current policies are based on prejudices and fears and not on results."
 
Another former South American president was also quoted in the CNN article:
Former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso of Brazil said the group called for only the decriminalization of marijuana and not other illicit drugs because "you have to start somewhere." [Emphasis added]
So, if prohibition causes violence, as Vicente Fox infers, why stop at drug prohibition?
 
A previous article examiner gun ownership and homicide rates from United Nations research. To recap that article:
 
·      Mexico prohibits gun ownership of calibers above .22, and actively discourages owning even those.
·      Countries with the lowest gun ownership rates average the highest homicide rates.
 
So it should be no surprise that Mexico, which has one-sixth the gun ownership rate of the United States, has over triple the homicide rate, according to UN data compiled between 1998 and 2000. Data from the Mexican government shows that between 1998 and 2006, “serious crimes” reported to the police have increased 46.5%; taking population growth into account, the rate increased 31.3%.
 
During the same time period, the U.S. violent crime rate decreased 16.6%, and the murder rate decreased 9.4%, while the ATF reports about 4.5 million civilian firearms, including about 2 million handguns, were sold each year between 1995 and 2007.
 
So, if drug prohibition causes increased violence, why not explore the possibility that gun prohibition has the same impact?
In real life, gun prohibition fails, too
The United Kingdom banned civilian gun ownership in 1997, but the Guardian recently reported that even as overall crime declines in the UK, “gun crime” continues to rise. While the most growth is in using guns to threaten others, the UK has complete gun prohibition, so the unanswered question is: Why do these people have guns to threaten with in the first place?
 
Another Guardian article noted:
"You can get a clean [unused] 9mm automatic for £1,500, a Glock for a couple of grand and you can even make an order for a couple of MAC-10s [machine guns],..Or you can get a little sawn-off for £150. They're easy enough to get hold of. You'll find one in any poverty area, every estate in London, and it's even easier in Manchester, where there are areas where the police don't go.
(U.S. federal law prohibits civilian sale of machine guns, and “sawn-off” rifles and shotguns.)
 
Australia, with its nearly-total gun prohibition, saw an 42.2% increase in its violent crime rate between 1995 and 2007.
 
In 2007, Washington D.C., with its prohibition on functioning firearms, had triple the violent crime rate, and 5.5 times the murder rate, of the rest of the U.S.
 
Just about everywhere you look, gun prohibition correlates with increased violent crime. So when are our world leaders going to make the connection?
 
*************************************
For in-depth analysis of tools to promote the right of self-defense, read Four Hundred Years of Gun Control: Why Isn’t It Working?, which deconstructs the gun control agenda and motivates more people to support our civil right of self-defense.


 

 

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Inside 'New Moon'
Get inside info on all things New Moon.
Robert Pattinson | Taylor Lautner

Recent Articles

Monday, November 23, 2009
New research shows that states with liberal concealed carry laws may be safer for Black Americans. A previous article examined eight years of Federal …
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Yesterday, Somali pirates attacked the commercial cargo ship Maersk Alabama. This time, however, an armed security team successfully thwarted the …

Related Slideshows

Things to see and do

Thunder From Down Under
24 Nov 2009 - 8 pm
House of Blues - Cleveland
More music »
Brett Dennen
House of Blues - Cleveland
19th and 20th Century Art
Allen Memorial Art Museum