Los Angeles
CHANGE MY LOCATION
Jay McDonough
Progressive Politics ExaminerJay began writing politically themed commentary and founded his blog, Swimming Freestyle, in October 2007. Here he'll write about politics from a progressive perspective.
Examiner Feeds
These websites were picked by the Progressive Politics Examiner as useful resources.National Examiners
Eddie Graveline
Mixed Martial Arts Examiner
Most Recent Post
Results: SHO XC Elite Challenger Series from Hammond, Indiana (Main Event)
Mixed Martial Arts Examiner
Most Recent Post
Results: SHO XC Elite Challenger Series from Hammond, Indiana (Main Event)
Judah Freed
Political Issues Examiner
Most Recent Post
John Sydney McCain exposed as a secret agent for Australia and the Wizard of Oz
Political Issues Examiner
Most Recent Post
John Sydney McCain exposed as a secret agent for Australia and the Wizard of Oz
Kristen Houghton
Relationship Examiner
Most Recent Post
Marriage Over? Getting Back in the Dating Game
Relationship Examiner
Most Recent Post
Marriage Over? Getting Back in the Dating Game
Did An Activist Supreme Court Punt On Heller?
47 comments
by Jay McDonough, Progressive Politics Examiner
The Constitution does not permit "the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home," Justice Antonin Scalia, the court's arch-conservative, wrote in the majority opinion.While the decision may have addressed the question of private ownership and "absolute prohibitions" like the District of Columbia statute, it raises new questions about what restrictions are reasonable.
"It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose," Scalia wrote.It came as no surprise that by the end of the week the NRA had already filed suits against gun ban statutes in the cities of Chicago and San Francisco.
Gun-control advocates say the ruling's focus on gun bans safeguards reasonable gun restrictions from the flurry of litigation it will undoubtedly trigger. "The Court's decision indicated regulation of guns, as opposed to the banning of handguns, is entirely permissible," says Dennis Henigan, vice president for law and policy at the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
While the Court's decision addresses bans on firearms, it didn't address what might be considered reasonable regulation of those firearms. Some jurisdictions have banned a specific type of firearm, like assault weapons or fully automatic weapons. The Court's Heller ruling might allow the challenging of those statues.
It's also worth noting this was a close decision by the Court. Four of the justices dissented and Justice Stevens was particularly critical of the majority:
In one of two dissenting opinions, Justice John Paul Stevens called Scalia's argument "strained and unpersuasive." He also blistered the majority for its expansive reading of the Amendment's "ambiguous" text. "Until today, it has been understood that legislatures may regulate the civilian use and misuse of firearms so long as they do not interfere with the preservation of a well-regulated militia," Stevens wrote. "The Court's announcement of a new constitutional right to own and use firearms for private purposes upsets that settled understanding."The best case is now that the whole militia/individual question is resolved and there are finally assurances that private ownership is sanctioned, some of the steam may be taken out of the debate and reasonable discussions about how guns can be kept from those individuals we all agree have absolutely no business owning a gun.
Topics: Supreme Court , Heller , Gun control
Subscribe
FeedComments
More from Progressive Politics Examiner
A PIcture for the Day
Troopergate report released
McCain got the message
Obama knew
Topics: Barack Obama
Connecticut Supreme Court rules for gay marriage
Obama: "I'll see your association, and raise you some culpability"
Topics: Obama , McCain , Ayers
