CHANGE MY LOCATION
Jay McDonough
Progressive Politics Examiner
Examiner Feeds
These websites were picked by the Progressive Politics Examiner as useful resources.National Examiners
Auto Examiner
Most Recent Article
Holiday automotive gift guide for Mr. or Mrs. Auto Fix-It
Early Childhood Parenting Examiner
Most Recent Article
Christmas Countdown Digital Advent Calendar: 20- Personalized stockings
Paranormal Examiner
Most Recent Article
Looking for workshop presenters, gain international exposure as an expert in your field
Internet Buzz Examiner
Most Recent Article
Amazing video: heroic dog rescues injured friend from busy highway
Bars and Clubs Examiner
Most Recent Article
Bar joke of the week: stopped by the police
Examiner is growing in Los Angeles
We are seeking writers... Ready to join us? Learn More »
Showing entries for Category: Status-of-Force-Agreement
Did Bush manipulate Iraq withdrawal date to benefit McCain?
2 comments
In July, Prime Minister Maliki had, for the most part, endorsed Barack Obama's proposed timeline of 16 months, or about the end of 2010. Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh reiterated the Prime Minister's position, saying "the end of 2010 is the appropriate time for the withdrawal.”
So, how did it end up end of 2011?
A source tells ThinkProgress that White House communications staff were concerned that Maliki’s endorsement of the 2010 time line would damage Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) presidential campaign. Indeed, during an interview with Iraqi television last week (according to an Open Source Center translation), Maliki suggested that the U.S. presidential elections played a role:
Actually, the final date was really the end of 2010 and the period between the end of 2010 and the end of 2011 was for withdrawing the remaining troops from all of Iraq, but they asked for a change [in date] due to political circumstances related to the [U.S] domestic situation so it will not be said to the end of 2010 followed by one year for withdrawal but the end of 2011 as a final date.
But by endorsing Obama’s time line, Maliki indirectly slighted McCain, who has consistently and strenuously argued against setting a withdrawal date and has even said he wouldn’t mind having U.S. troops in Iraq for 100 years. But Maliki’s new position has left McCain scrambling, first saying its “a pretty good timetable,” but then denying he used “the word timetable” and later settling on “anything is good.”
Despite Bush’s constant refrain that commanders, not politics, will decide the course in Iraq, it seems that trying to help his party retain the White House is more important. (Link)
It's all about priorities, right?
Topics: Bush , Iraq , Status of Force Agreement
Subscribe
Feed
Comments
More from Progressive Politics Examiner
Hooyah
Topics: Iraq , Status of Force Agreement , Maliki
Iraqis Say "Thanks, But No Thanks"
Topics: Bush , Iran , Iraq , Status of Force Agreement
My Status of Force Confusion
Topics: Bush , Iraq , Status of Force Agreement
Status of Force Update
Topics: Iraq , Status of Force Agreement
