Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
Washington DC Transportation Bicycle Transportation Examiner
Bicycle Transportation Examiner

Walk your bike signs cropping up in DC

June 25, 7:42 AMBicycle Transportation ExaminerAdam Voiland
4 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Bicycle Transportation Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


Riding prohibited, new signs in Georgetown warn.

The District Department of Transportation (DDOT) has been making a lot of noise in recent months about pedestrian safety. In June, Mayor Fenty announced the city will use $4 million of stimulus funds to shore up shoddy sidewalks. Last month, DDOT released the final findings of the District's Pedestrian Master Plan. "Pedestrian safety is one of this administration's top priorities," Mayor Fenty has emphasized.  

Perhaps that's why pedestrian safety signs admonishing cyclists have been cropping up across the city at a noticeable clip. It seems everywhere you look there's a new sign urging cyclists to dismount, slow down, or ditch their bikes entirely. For example, there's nearly a dozen new safety signs in quick secession on the waterfront in Georgetown.  

Do such signs work? Rarely have I actually seen a cyclist abide by a dismount sign, though that's not to say they don't guilt riders into somewhat safer cycling habits. I certainly feel compelled to at least slow down when passing such signs. However, there are also plenty of riders chaffing at the new signs.

A colleague of mine, a competitive mountain rider, shared her exasperation about the signs after a pedestrian chewed her out for not dismounting--as a sign instructed--near a bridge on the Mount Vernon bike trail. "The signs probably caused--or at least exacerbated--the problem," she said. "We’ve become overly concerned about safety, and we’ve forgotten that what we really need on the bike paths is for people to exercise good judgment."

Much easier said than done, but some urban planners are convinced that less is more when it comes to safety signage. NPR, for example, has published a piece about a German town that has intentionally eliminated signage on its busiest roads. Wired has a profile of a traffic engineer set on phasing out traffic lights, safety signs, and road markings. And a Duke University professor has argued in the Atlantic that safety signs are more distraction than help.

The bottom line, proponents of this style of traffic engineering argue, is that roads that incorporate elements of controlled chaos and ambiguity about who has the right of way force both pedestrians and motorists to pay better attention to the road, making the roads safer for all.

Jay Mallin, a local photographer and blogger, created the slideshow of cycling safety signs in the DC area that's below.

 

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Vancouver 2010
Get exclusive coverage from Examiners on the Winter Games in Vancouver.

Recent Articles

Tuesday, February 9, 2010
University of California researcher Michael Jerrett has presented new evidence showing that the built environment has a direct impact on human health …
Monday, February 8, 2010
Washington: Irony of Ironies Jim Sebastian, coordinator of the District's bicycle program and the guy who helped bring the city the fancy new bike …