Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
DISPOSABLE VS. COTTON: The heated debate over the environmental costs of diapers, a roughly $5 billion business, goes something like this: on one hand, the 25 billion or so disposable diapers used per year in this country are bad because they are made with petroleum-based plastics, account for more than 250,000 trees being cut down and make up some 3.5 million tons of landfill waste that won’t decompose for decades. Cotton diapers, on the other hand, now enjoying a resurgence in popularity, cost less over the long run but require vast amounts of energy from the production of cotton, the washing and the distribution. Environmental and industry groups brandishing rival stats and studies have effectively declared a draw. Even an outspoken group like theNatural Resources Defense Council declines to take a trenchant position (“six of one and a half dozen of the other,” a spokeswoman says). Apparently the only way between the two sides is to do without (which means teaching babies to use a toilet) or adopt some middle-way product like gDiapers, which combine cloth and flushable elements. The late Donella H. Meadows, the founder of Vermont’s Sustainability Institute, recognized the conflict long before the carbon footprints of everyday objects were a mainstream concern. “It’s great to try to move our lives in the direction of ecological righteousness, but it’s also true that every human activity has environmental impact,” she wrote in an op-ed article that appeared in newspapers in 1990. In addressing the debate over diapers, she had what may have been the final word. “From the earth’s point of view,” she said, “it’s not all that important which kind of diapers you use. The important decision was having the baby.” CHRISTIAN DeBENEDETTI







