Donna Feldman grew up in New Jersey with a nutrition-obsessed mother who put wheat
germ in everything. She rebelled, but during a college all-nighter, she picked up a copy
of a popular nutrition paperback, eventually earning a Master of Science in Nutrition at Cornell University. She now has a private practice in nutrition counseling in
Boulder County. Contact her at health.examiner@mindspring.com.
Want to buy milk that’s free of bovine somatatropin (BST) growth hormone? That may not be possible. Want to buy milk that’s free of recombinant BST? That might be possible, if milk products were labeled properly. Certain people in government and industry oppose labeling that might help you make that choice. This drama is playing out in Ohio at the moment, where grocery giant Kroger wants to offer customers hormone-free milk. Except that there really isn’t any hormone-free milk. Cows make their own BST, which ends up in milk. The issue for Kroger is added BST, which is fed to cows to boost milk production. Labeling milk “hormone free” is technically incorrect. What Kroger really means is “free from added hormones”.
Monsanto is not happy about that. Nor are dairy producers who do feed their cows Monsanto’s recombinant BST. They believe a label that says “free from...” implies something’s wrong with added rBST. Consumers might read “free from..” and conclude it’s a superior product. Except that “free from...” has to be accompanied by an FDA-mandated disclaimer: "no significant difference has been shown between milk derived from [the growth hormone] rbST-supplemented and non-rbST supplemented cows". I just love this bureaucrat-speak. What exactly does “no significant difference” mean? In color? Taste? Protein content? And what about “has been shown”? By whom? What was shown?
Are you confused yet? Throw in more claims, if it’s organic milk (antibiotic-free, pesticide-free), and you might start thinking calcium-fortified orange juice is less hassle. Not only are Kroger, Monsanto and numerous trade and consumer organizations arguing about what labels can, or cannot say, they’re also arguing about how big the font for a claim can be, and where on the label the disclaimers must be, related to the “Free from...” claims and organic claims and so forth--to the left, to the right? Maybe underneath and in italics? This is the kind of thing the FDA spends time on.
Milk has become a battle ground for agribusiness, trade organizations and consumer groups. The agribusiness and trade groups want to sell products, but they don't always want you to have all possible information. Or some of them want you to have way too much information. Consumers just want to make informed choices. Is this so hard to accomplish?
Topics:
Eggbeaters ,
eating disorders ,
milk ,
bovine somatotropin ,
organic
The French fashionistas are at it again. They’re not - not - promoting anorexia. And they mean it this time. Really. We know they mean it because this time they’re signing a “charter of good conduct”, a... Read More Topics:
chicken soup ,
eating disorders ,
anorexia ,
body image