Carrie Prejean on the cover of National Review - WHAT THE F#@$

July 27, 11:57 PMSan Jose Independent ExaminerSoheil Rezaee

Previous Next

9 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe

Get alerts when there is a new article from the San Jose Independent Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.

Email Address   Include other special offers from Examiner.com Terms of Use

The August 10 issue of National Review

You read correct, Carrie Prejean (Miss. California) is on the cover of National Review (the conservative publication). Now your respond should be "WHAT THE F*#$" or "YOU GOT TO BE S%&#ing ME"

I have the strongest feeling that the late William F. Buckley Jr. (founder of National Review) is going to pop out of his grave just to strangle the moron who came up with the idea (with a witty yet wise remark). 

Sure some political junkies will argue it was a good choice since she is hot; but so is Ann Colter, Sarah Palin, Ayn Rand, or any female country singer. 

But come on, she is just an ex-beauty pageant title holder who is no different from any other Vally Girl from Southern California (good looking,good in the bed, not good at everything else). 

The main story to go with the cover picture is tittled "The Carrie Effect" which is a few pages worth of written illiteracy about Prejean "encouraging people to voice their opposition against gay marriage and how it help get Proposition 8 (ban on gay marriage) pass.".

To add more laughs to the article, it was written by Maggie Gallagher (this is when you turn your head to the side and go "ewwww thats gross").

This has to be National Reviews biggest blunder since they supported the wrong side during the Civil Rights Movement (for which Buckley apalogized for in the mid-1960's).

All any intellectual could prey for is that this vile cover has not embarrassed the reputation of such a respectable publication.