Search articles from thousands of Examiners
Write for us
New York News Page One Examiner
Page One Examiner

The Carrie Prejean sex tape is child pornography

November 10, 1:28 PMPage One ExaminerTim Worstall
8 comments Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe


Get alerts when there is a new article from the Page One Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.
Email Address


  Include other special offers from Examiner.com
Terms of Use


The Carrie Prejean sex tape is child pornography. AP Photo

There won't be a public release of the Carrie Prejean sex tape: for it is child pornography.

The story of the Carrie Prejean sex tape is pretty well known by now. The former Miss California was suing pageant organisers and they were suing her. Then, at a crucial moment in the negotiations lawers were able to show a sex tape of Carrie Prejean to her and her lawyers, showing that she had breached the pageant rules about not having been photographed nude (or of course, anything further) before entering the contest.

However, there is something more that still can be said about the Prejean sex tape. It's not about to make it to a video store near you nor is anyone (at least anyone identifiable) about to release it on the web. And even if it is, you most certainly should not try watching it, for to do so would make you a sex offender. For the Carrie Prejean sex tape is in fact child pornography.

Dethroned beauty queen Carrie Prejean calls an X-rated sex video of herself "the biggest mistake of my life."

Prejean, the former Miss California USA, says she made the sex flick of herself alone when she was 17, for an ex-boyfriend.

You've got to be 18 to exercise your constitutionally protetcted rights to free speech by stripping off and having sex of any kind on camera. If you're a day below that age then it isn't free speech, it's child pornography. And those who sell it, those who distribute it and even, in certain places, those who watch it inadvertently can go to jail.

All of which leaves open an intriguing option for Carrie Prejean herself if she wishes to pursue it. If it really is true that the pageant's lawyers played the tape in that meeting, rather than just revealing its existence, then they themselves are guilty of possession of (and quite possibly production of, given the way the law works about how computers reproduce images as they play them) child pornography. Not that this would earn her any money, but seeing them go down for years as a result would be some sort of revenge, wouldn't it?


joomla site stats

 

More About: news · sex · celebrities · crime

Comments

Name:


Comments:
characters left

NOTE: Do Not Alter These Fields:

Inside 'New Moon'
Get inside info on all things New Moon.
Robert Pattinson | Taylor Lautner

Recent Articles

Wednesday, November 25, 2009
The Richmond VA mixer, DJ Peachez, has passed away according to reports. Starting out from a troubled background DJ Peachez was able to start …
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
The number one Google image result for "Michelle Obama" is a crudely done Photoshop of the face of a monkey (actually, a chimpanzee, which …

Things to see and do

Big Apple Circus
26 Nov 2009 - 2 pm
Lincoln Center – Damrosch Park
More special event »
Origami Holiday Tree
American Museum of Natural History