Wednesday's VAWA Senate Hearing - a dog-and-pony show

June 9, 8:19 AMDomestic Violence ExaminerTrudy Schuett

Previous Next

1 comment Print Email RSS Subscribe

Subscribe

Get alerts when there is a new article from the Domestic Violence Examiner. Read Examiner.com's terms of use.

Email Address   Include other special offers from Examiner.com Terms of Use

Note: At the previous round of Senate hearings for the reauthorization of VAWA for 2005, Phyllis Schlafly tried to get me an invitation. She (and I) were refused, and she was told quite plainly that they were only interested in hearing from witnesses that were for the reauthorization of VAWA. They were not interested in hearing anything against it.  -- TWS

A RADAR alert

The Violence Against Women Act was passed in 1994 with the laudable intention of solving the problem of domestic violence. Unfortunately the law has numerous flaws:

   1. VAWA programs have been ineffective in reducing partner abuse, and in some ways have placed victims at greater risk of violence.

   2. VAWA undermines basic notions of civil liberties and the presumption of innocence.

   3. VAWA programs have had a disproportionate negative effect on minority and low-income populations.

   4. VAWA undermines the family, escalates partner conflict, and discourages reconciliation.

   5. VAWA fosters sex-based discrimination.

   6. VAWA promotes half-truths, myths, and falsehoods about domestic violence.

   7. VAWA encourages immigration fraud.

   8. VAWA programs lack accountability and allow wasteful use of taxpayer dollars.

When the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on reauthorizing VAWA in 2005, RADAR conducted a campaign to request that the Committee invite some of the most knowledgeable science-based domestic violence researchers in the world to testify at the hearings. Word came back to us through unofficial channels that no matter how world-reknowned a proposed researcher may be in the study of domestic violence, the Senators running the Committee were determined to prevent anyone who would criticize VAWA in any way from testifying at the hearings. Instead, the Committee invited testimony from Hollywood actresses and stakeholders with a financial interest in hiding VAWA's flaws. Rather than holding a hearing, the Senate Judiciary Committee ended up holding a dog-and-pony show.

VAWA will be up for reauthorization next year, and this Wednesday, June 10th, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold the first of a series of "hearings." The list of witnesses they've invited to the June 10th hearing, which they've titled "The Continued Importance of the Violence Against Women Act", can be seen here.  As in the past, they've invited a Hollywood actress and people whose livelihoods would be jeopardized if VAWA's failings were revealed. Since the Senators have shown a determination to ignore objective science-based researchers who might detract from the planned lovefest, these "hearings" will not be an honest investigation into what is and what isn't working in VAWA, but will instead be nothing more than sham cheerleading sessions.

Many of these Senators objected vociferously as they accused the Bush administration of hiding information to get the policy they wanted – the invasion of Iraq. These same Senators now need to hear from the public that it is equally unacceptable for them to hide important information by manipulating the VAWA reauthorization hearings.

R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of men and women working to improve the effectiveness of our nation's approach to solving domestic violence.

http://mediaradar.org/docs/RADARdocument-Agenda-for-VAWA-Reform.pdf