Well hey there again readers and air show buffs,
The following video released on September 21st 2009 was taken at a military air show and depicts a UFO within the footage that clearly shows its superiority in speed and maneuverability. Could this craft be one of ours with the intent on subjecting citizens to more exposure to UFOs or could this be one of theirs showing how vulnerable we can be? You decide. Though our thoughts are still inconclusive, we know that Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin and a number of other government contracting organizations have created similar if not identical crafts in a addition to other organizations affiliated with various world governments pilot crafts once belonging to Extraterrestrials. Going further on this idea we will direct our readers to an interview with Jake Simpson conducted by Project Camelot. The overview of the interview covers what has been labeled "The biggest secret". Human built battle ships in space and fleets of UFO type crafts that are 10,000 years ahead of the rest of us on Earth. Check out that story here. Jake Simpson interview on Project Camelot.
Here is that video of the UFO at the air show.
Thanks for tuning in,
The Sacramento UFO Examiner
Comments
ya gotta be kidding right? It's a bug.
It is a bee closer to the camera
Haha, A insect?
You gotta be kidding Me!
What insect do you know that is partly metallic -
Also, Is the second Object another Insect?
...Skeptics...sigh
My guess is that this isn't an alien craft and is indeed a fly or a bee. I believe the video may have been tampered with aswell as the frame shots look different at the beginning. Maybe the person who posted it has smoothed the legs to look like a rounded edged craft. I am firm believer in things to come, but this is not IMO an U.F.O craft.
Show Off's--- universal kids and there new cars-lol
A fly, unfortunately. There are more convincing videos available.
I once had a UFO experience that involved disclosing a coverup by the US Air Force. The way they countered the disclosure was to drown the story in technical analysis... knowing that most people would just stop reading after the third paragraph.
Lately, we're seeing a flood of pictures, videos, and stories which are without a doubt meant to overwhelm and cause a lack of belief through fatigue. Governments are great at this.
My guess... true off-planet ufo's, stay away. They know the earth is infected with mad religious morons. Besides... what could they need from earth?
If other world UFO's truly wanted to go un-noticed, they would simply paint things on their craft to make them look like trash can lids, hats, or hanging lamps. Then... nobody would believe the videos at all... and they could do as they pleased.
And why do these vids always have the music and 'produced by' titles?
And if this is a real UFO... Who cares? Are we afraid of a flying dot? Geesh!
A bug, or a bird...where are all the UFO videos from Astronomers??
They spends years looking at the sky.
I enjoyed the music - but why is the UFO so fuzzy when the fighters are relatively well-defined? In fact, why are UFOs always fuzzy in photographs and videos?
UFO's believers are like religious/cult groups. All the Govt has to do is just put an ounce of 'disbelief' into the mix and it will have factions within it fighting actively within its own ranks. Why ? To move the inquiry away from the absolute truth - many Advanced races are here and are active. They know humans are an arrogant, cowardly, ultraviolent, and ignorant species already. OMG why do they waste their time here ???
My initial assessment is that it is a bug/flying insect. Easy enough to research if you go to the same area around the same time of year and time of day and shoot sky video for a few minuets. Must duplicate the actual conditions to allow for the specific insect species behavior. Also look at official video of the event or other amateur videos from the same time. Otherwise there is no evidence this was a craft (UFO) of any sort.
Most people only notice these when their 3D experience does not register a bug as anything but a bug goes to the 2D format of video that puts distant objects and foreground in the same plane without focal separation. Common perceptual mistake.
We know UFOs are real, but have to be sober minded about this and do proper study before we dilute real UFO events. That job is left to the counter-intelligence efforts of those who want us "to not pay attention to the man behind the curtain." UFOs are real, so are bugs.
That was no bug.
If you notice the angle at which the unknown object enters the field of view of the camera you will see it enters it at an awkward angle and relatively much closer to the camera lens than the fighter jets. Even though I believe in UFO's this video appears to show anything but a UFO. I put my money on the object in question being some type of insect that was inadvertently recorded at close range.
DEFO A UFO I AN SEN LOTS OF THEM IN MY WIFE TIME
That Project Camelot interview is ridiculous. Just too convenient. The information disclosed makes itself irrefutable by design. No audio recording, no evidence the person disclosing the info even exists, and not only is there no documentation supporting anything they discuss, but the person supposedly being interviewed claims that as long the Project Camelot folks never present proof of any of their findings, they're in the clear. Otherwise, they could and probably will be MURDERED! Give me a break. Also, there is about 3 paragraphs of self-congratulations on what a terrific job the Project Camelot folks are doing, but this is disguised as a pat on the back from this anonymous, but most respected whistleblower. Save yourself the time and don't read the interview. Project Camelot is very obviously just a couple of Sci-Fi nerds. And for the record, I believe in the existence of UFO's and ET.
Just one word, "bug."
Definitely an insect or even a small bird, but closer to the camera than the aircraft it was focused on. Did anybody actually see it with the naked eye, or was it only found afterwards when viewing the video?
Its a bug or a bird, closer to the camera.... more nonsense... do you ever check your sources and the evidential chain of custody, etc? Or do you just spew whatever looks good out there? I mean, what possible good do you think you are doing? Go study a case and write a real white paper on it. Learn photoanaylsis. Do something but stop shoveling crap at us and calling it fudge... Such a waste of time, can't believe I bothered... nobody would suggest that this is a "craft" if they did two minutes of simple analysis and asked a couple of appropriate questions...
you will know when you see a real ufo it will change how you see the world as we know it and yes it probably is a bug
Let's think about this...if it was an object actually travelling within the atmosphere at such a high speed, it would have been supersonic. That is, when observed from the ground as in the video, the object would have left a sonic boom footprint. If this had occurred, it would have been reported (the jets are subsonic by the way).
So, we have two options:
1. It was a subsonic bug or bird filmed at close range to the camera, giving a very high apparent speed, or
2. It was a (VERY) supersonic object seen at a distance, that somehow ablated the supersonic airflow to avoid a sonic boom.
Which is MORE likely? Of course the bug/bird hypothesis is more likely, because a supersonic would have been seen or heard very clearly by most of the general public viewing the formation of jet aircraft. Even if the object were a supersonic aircraft overtaking the formation whilst using a "sound cloaking" technology, it would have been SEEN by the crowd, and widely reported.
Sorry - NO UFO
Let's think about this...if it was an object actually travelling within the atmosphere at such a high speed, it would have been supersonic. That is, when observed from the ground as in the video, the object would have left a sonic boom footprint. If this had occurred, it would have been reported (the jets are subsonic by the way).
So, we have two options:
1. It was a subsonic bug or bird filmed at close range to the camera, giving a very high apparent speed, or
2. It was a (VERY) supersonic object seen at a distance, that somehow ablated the supersonic airflow to avoid a sonic boom.
Which is MORE likely? Of course the bug/bird hypothesis is more likely, because a supersonic would have been seen or heard very clearly by most of the general public viewing the formation of jet aircraft. Even if the object were a supersonic aircraft overtaking the formation whilst using a "sound cloaking" technology, it would have been SEEN by the crowd, and widely reported.
Sorry - NO UFO
Let's think about this...if it was an object actually travelling within the atmosphere at such a high speed, it would have been supersonic. That is, when observed from the ground as in the video, the object would have left a sonic boom footprint. If this had occurred, it would have been reported (the jets are subsonic by the way).
So, we have two options:
1. It was a subsonic bug or bird filmed at close range to the camera, giving a very high apparent speed, or
2. It was a (VERY) supersonic object seen at a distance, that somehow ablated the supersonic airflow to avoid a sonic boom.
Which is MORE likely? Of course the bug/bird hypothesis is more likely, because a supersonic would have been seen or heard very clearly by most of the general public viewing the formation of jet aircraft. Even if the object were a supersonic aircraft overtaking the formation whilst using a "sound cloaking" technology, it would have been SEEN by the crowd, and widely reported.
Sorry - NO UFO
Yup, that there was a bug, BUT A BUG NOT OF THIS HERE EARTH!
@ the (notso)Good Skeptic,
These vehicles aren't flying by rules as we know them. DUH. Our gravity doesn't affect them, our physics don't apply. The skeptics here wish to call it a bug... a hoax... I'd say, remain uncertain. There is not enough evidence here to say with any certainty that this is an "insect"... I'd say more evidence is probably out there... this couldn't have been the only camera rolling at an airshow. It's unidentified, that's for SURE.
Bug.
There is more then that little ship hanging around there, I can see several of them that are cloaked, nice one at 40 seconds middle about 1/4" from top just hanging there in clouds... you can see it again between 2:43-2:45 a bit better. There are others but you have to know what you are looking for. They are here so everyone just deal with it...it even came out of one that was cloaked. I trust they are here for our benefit.
It's a low-flying fowl...well below the aircraft formation!
Like a Duck!! Say??? Duck Dodgers of the 24th & 1/2 Century!! LOL!
Sorry, not an ET craft... Bug or Bird.
Ok...If it was another craft that entered the viewfinder, why wouldn't the photographer have immediately tracked the new object? If you're shooting a Cessna and an F-15 shoots past your viewfinder unexpectedly I guarantee that you will change your attention from the Cessna to the jet. So why wouldn't you change your attention from a jet to a UFO traveling at more than twice the speed on the jets? I'm always amazed when people will so easily rule out simple easily acceptable explanations for events and reach for explanations that defy any science known to man. Good investigation requires you to accept that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? You first have to eliminate that impossible. Although a bug is a reasonable explanation, you’re probably correct in that it was some teenage alien hotdogging it to impress his friends.
TheGoodSkeptic......Eat bananas disinfo reptoid agent....... I'm here for you and your animal friends......The pilot of Su27 issued countermeasures......The Mig29 Pilot saw a flying cross, the eurofighter pilot tried to dodge an insect....or a bird??????
a supersonic bird.........or whitesnow.......?????? The three words of reptoids......Bird, Insect & Chinese lanterns......means that you have a big brain......a brain of repty shi..t...now sleep...is better....
I believe in other life forms outside our solar system. but this was a fly.
The object moved so quickly across the screen that it's hard to say if it was aircraft sized or much, much smaller. The attempt at a closeup does lead me to believe that it was too large and too high to be an insect. Too ambiguous to say what it was.
As for the "interview" that's laughable nonsense. The idea that we have a fleet of alien derived ships is, as they say, a howler. If the USA had anything even remotely similar do you think we'd still be chugging around with combustion technology? We'd use them as weapons here on earth in a nanosecond. Forget rockets and F22 fighter jets. They'd instantly become rickety antiques fit only for the Smithsonian. Next you'll be telling me that the creator of the universe had sex with an obscure Jewish girl in a distant Roman province and their child had divine properties and came back from the dead after being brutally executed and if you believe this story you, too, will live forever after you die. People will believe all sorts of rubbish.
I agree with Bob J I take pics of the sky all the time and never see anything until I download...then there are all kinds of unknowns show up...some really great ones unfortunately I'm not computer savy enough to cut and paste, or enlarge and copy...other wise MUFON would have their hands full ...:)
@ BobF… “F” says a lot about you. You FAIL to grasp the concept of eternity. Maybe one day you’ll get to experience something that will give you a clue, maybe not. It’s all good (or bad) ~ Hades has room for you. The possibility that fleets of vehicles in space exist is NOT as farfetched as you’d think. Open your blind eye to the fact that the technology we see is very far behind what exists. The SR-71 was technology developed in the 1950s… a craft capable of Mach 3+… the public didn’t know about it till the mid 80’s. Look at the gap. Understand that we aren’t privy to TONS of information; you can bet a great deal of it is advanced technology. The powers that be tell you only what they feel you can handle… and that’s not much.
@wjdoy… these vehicles are faster and quieter than the conventional aircraft you reference. Often times they are not seen with the naked eye. If your camera were to try and track a vehicle moving at such speeds it would be nothing but blurred.
Im very interested by the ufo phenomenon and all related to it, but this video shows nothing as the title indicated. Probably a bird flying closer to the camera than the jets.
Unidentified Fling Bug
Unidentified Flying Bug
hmm; lets see; fighters with gear down, flaps fully extened for landing / slow flight, in formation....not exactly what you would use for a speed comparison. With lense focused on planes.... my cell phone takes better pictures. But hey, who doesn't like an airshow. Sure beats them exploding in mid-air like at Ramstein back in '88.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!