We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 51°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Major League Soccer players strike? Players and league far apart so far

You can't really blame the players in the MLS Players Union, can you? They've seen Toronto FC come in to MLS in 2007 to sell out crowds. They've watched as "designated players" such as David Beckham in Los Angeles and Freddie Ljungberg in Seattle have waltzed over to America and not only taken roster spots, but millions of dollars in salary as well. Meanwhile some of them are earning less than you could as a fast food assistant manager. As if to rub it in, the media and fans are also given free access to the numbers. Here's a 2009 salary list for each MLS club as posted on USA today. Here's the Players Union version.

Sounders fans are following the talks in the GOALSeattle.com forums.

Reports in recent days (see below) suggest the player unrest is more deeply founded that merely getting raises, though. The union has issues with the very structure of MLS and the lack of free movement of players between clubs. Perhaps this time a splash of cash won't be enough to bring the sides together.

Will the MLS Players Union decide to interrupt the 2010 season in a World Cup year?

With the current bargaining agreement between the union and MLS set to expire on January 31st 2010, there have been meetings in recent days to see where both sides stand. Kristian Dyer of ESPN's Soccernet reported yesterday: MLS and players far apart on labor negotiations. "MLS has made tremendous strides in its first 14 seasons," said Bob Foose, executive director of the MLS Players Union. "We believe it's now time to take the training wheels off and give MLS clubs the freedom to truly compete against each other and other clubs outside of the league in a manner that is consistent with what occurs everywhere else in the world." A source close to the league called last week's negotiations "contentious" between the two sides.

Nigel Reed of CBC Sports writes today of Major League Soccer's winter of discontent. Traded players, whose contract is with the League not the club they represent, have no say in the matter. I still recall the shock expressed by Alecko Eskandarian in 2007 when, just days after scoring his first (and last) goal for Toronto FC, he was shipped out to Salt Lake after only 6 months with the expansion franchise.

The single entity nature of Major League Soccer suggests the practice is unlikely to end any time soon. But players are human beings too. As such it doesn't seem unreasonable to allow the lifeblood of the League to have an opinion on where his individual future lies.

MLS commissioner Don Garber is ready to resist any players' revolt. He's made it crystal clear he's not willing to compromise over key issues to avoid a strike and has branded the union "simply wrong" in its assertion the League isn’t playing by FIFA's rules.

Over at Soccer America, Ridge Mahoney writes that the S-word looms over union discussions. Let's hope the matter doesn't hit an impasse, which can happen, even though neither side can afford, literally, to shut each other out. And let's hope it doesn't take a extraordinary turn of events, as was the case a few years ago when Landon Donovan sat next to Sunil Gulati on a plane for several hours to broker an agreement for U.S. Soccer and its players regarding national-team and World Cup bonuses. MLS doesn't need Donovan and Gulati to figure this out. It needs sense, as in common. That is the operative S-word.

The financial successes of MLS clubs  in Toronto, Seattle and Los Angeles are offset by challenges in San Jose, Kansas City, Dallas and Columbus. I've got to ask, though, how much longer players like Jhon Kennedy Hurtado ($39,000) can dominate the league and still desire to stay here at such bargain basement  prices? How long will Sounders fans pack Qwest Field to see a club only as deep as 2.9 million dollars in TOTAL roster salary? How much longer will we see the best American players leave for other leagues around the world? How soon will we see, if ever, the ability for Major League Soccer clubs to use the advantages they've earned by running a successful business on the pitch, spending some of that money where it counts? How long until MLS breaks the cartel and allows actual 'free agency,' if ever? When will, if ever, MLS clubs own their players rather than the league?

"It is certainly our sincere hope that we can have an agreement in place by (January 31)," union executive director Bob Foose told Reuters recently.

"But in order to do that there are going to have to be significant changes made to the way the league functions and obviously we would have to come to agreement on economic pieces."

Major League Soccer commissioner Don Garber in the same report: "We understand and accept the fact that they will be tough negotiations but we are very committed to putting together a deal that will be good for our players, for management so that we can continue to together grow the sport."

Advertisement

By

Seattle Soccer Examiner

David Falk has followed professional and college soccer in the Puget Sound area since 1974. He is the webmaster of the popular local soccer website...

Comments

  • Cohen 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    F#$% Garber. He can't have it both ways. Not only is the current status (the league owning the players) against FIFA regulations, but he is following a very "socialist", single-entity, restrictive model, that is not good for the development of the league. Yes, the current system was good for the league for the first 10 years or so, in order to make sure of the league's survival. Now, it is time for Garber to step down and let someone else take the league to the next level. Paying players under $40K salary is not going to help.

  • David Falk 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I generally agree with you, Cohen, but I will also point out that the old NASL was around for a decade before it opened Pandora's box with the New York Cosmos'spending spree, too. That league limped along, became a momentary fashion flash because of big money players, and then died because of it. Maybe MLS has tried TOO hard to avoid those mistakes. Could be...

  • Futfanatico 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    The current single entity structure really produces the same labor problems as third party ownership which was recently banned in the English Premiership - players are at the mercy and whims of ownership with little say in the path of their own career

  • Don 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    One question. Is the league making money? And, what about those clubs that are not carring their own weight? Will they be regulated to lesser status?

  • Reece 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    If there are going to restrict players like such why not owners? Bob Kraft does nothing for his team, yet he votes to keep the cap low and mooch of TFC, SSFC, and Galaxy. If the players get screwed so should the owners. That means more advertising, and more effort put into using their DP slot and building/controlling the stadium they use. (looking at you San Jose) Lets be fair Don, oh and no more back door deals! I want to see step by step how and where each team spent their salary.

  • RJ 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Garber says, "we are very committed to putting together a deal that will be good for our players, for management so that we can continue to together grow the sport."

    I'm sorry, Mr. Garber, but if the players strike, there won't be a future for your sport to grow. Don't believe me? Ask the NHL.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...