Rasmussen finds 57% of U.S. voters favor a military response to eliminate North Korea’s missile launching capability. Just 15% of voters oppose a military response and 28% are not sure.
There is no ideological divide on this issue:
Support for a military response comes from 66% of Republicans, 52% of Democrats and 54% of those not affiliated with either major political party. There is no gender gap on the issue as a military response is favored by 57% of men and 57% of women.
[. . .]
Seventy-three percent (73%) are at least somewhat concerned that North Korea will use nuclear weapons against the United States.
The survey was conducted April 3-4, the two days immediately prior to North Korea’s launch. The question asked about a military response if North Korea actually did launch a long-range missile.
Will President Obama's tough talk and U.N. approach to the North Korean rocket launch satisfy this majority of voters?
Special Report: Obama's First 100 DaysExclusive examiner.com coverage of the Obama administration's promise to bring about change.











Comments
Does anyone really believe 75% of registered voters have been following the issue "closely?"
I suppose the best question to this is why military action is the default response to a failed ballistic missile test.
Moreover, in typical Rasmussen fashion, the wording of the question is loaded. "Launch a long-range ballistic missile" implies an attack of some sort, as opposed to a more accurate "test long-range ballistic missiles."
But that wouldn't grab a headline.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!