Somewhere beneath “Stoker’s” watercolor-like cinematography, the sinister music (and who knew Nancy Sinatra's and Lee Hazlewood’s “Summer Wine” could be so disturbing), the blood spatter in all of its red fineness, and most especially, the two pairs of the bluest of blue eyes one has ever seen on the screen, is what turns out to be, nothing more than a slasher film, albeit a stunningly packaged film. It’s because of this beauty that I will be creeped out for some time to come. However, don’t view this as praise or a recommendation, because it is most assuredly not.
"Stoker," with screenplay by Wentworth Miller ("Prison Break") and Erin Cressida Wilson, is basically India Stoker’s (Mia Wasikowska) story. High-school age India spends most of her time in her own head and her one friend seems to be her father, Richard (Dermot Mulroney). He’s killed suddenly in a car accident and it’s at the funeral that India meets for the first time her father's younger brother, Charlie (Matthew Goode). That’s when the creep factor begins in earnest. A too soon immediate attraction from Richard’s widow and India’s mother, Evelyn (Nicole Kidman),begins for Charlie. He reciprocates, but at the same time we also sense something not quite right in how Charlie interacts with India.
Mia Wasikowska is an outstanding actress. Her work in "Albert Nobbs," "The Kids Are All Right" and "Alice in Wonderland" is as good as anything her peer,Jennifer Lawrence, has done. BUT in "Stoker" she is so one-note sullen (and the dark brown severe hair-style does her no favors) as to become painful and boring to watch.
"Stoker" is no friend to Nicole Kidman. She probably thought that working with Park would be an interesting experience. Perhaps it was for her, but not for the audience. Kidman spends most of her time staring with her big, blue eyes. This movie is so beneath her.
Finally, Mathew Goode. He also spends a lot of time gazing, glaring or staring with his big, blue eyes. He might be "Stoker’s" most interesting character.