Browse National Real Estate & Construction Articles

Feds subpoena FHA lenders with high foreclosure rates

  • January 20th, 2010 1:21 pm ET

The Feds are going after mortgage companies with questionably high rates of foreclosures on homes they finance.

This week, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Inspector General Kenneth M. Donohue and Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Commissioner David H. Stevens announced an initiative to target mortgage companies with significant claim rates against the Federal Housing Administration mortgage insurance program.

Mortgage insurance is paid by borrowers, but protects lenders with cash benefits should the borrower default. When lenders foreclose against homeowners with the coverage, it triggers mortgage insurance benefits for lenders to help them bail out.

The investigation was initiated after FHA Commissioner, David Stevens, became alarmed by the incidence of claims against the FHA insurance fund by a number of poor performing companies who had also reached out for federal assistance.

HUD's Office of Inspector General (OIG) served subpoenas to the corporate offices of 15 mortgage companies across the country demanding documents and data related to failed loans which resulted in claims paid out by the FHA mortgage insurance fund.

Served were:

First Tennessee Bank N.A., Memphis, TN
Alethes LLC, Lakeway, TX
Security Atlantic Mortgage Co., Edison, NJ
Pine State Mortgage Corporation, Atlanta, GA
Birmingham Bancorp Mortgage Corporation, West Bloomfield, MI
Alacrity Financial Services, LLC, Southlake, TX
Assurity Financial Services, LLC, Englewood, CO
D and R Mortgage Corporation, Farmington, MI
Webster Bank, Cheshire, CT
Mac-Clair Mortgage Corporation, Flint, MI
Americare Investment Group, Inc., Arlington, TX
1st Advantage Mortgage, Lombard, IL
American Sterling Bank, Independence, MO
Sterling National Mortgage Company Inc., Great Neck, NY
Dell Franklin Financial LLC, Columbia, MD

The Feds are being applauded for going after mortgage lenders who may have contributed to the housing crisis by writing bad loans, but they are also criticized for not examining their own underwriting standards which some say could prolong housing's woes.

"While the FHA should be commended for its vigilance in trying to detect patterns of fraudulent origination and underwriting practices, it is also critical to the risk management process that the actual underwriting guidelines, set in place by FHA, be thoroughly examined as well," said Nancy Osborne, chief operating officer of Erate.com, a Santa Clara, CA-based financial information publisher and interest rate tracker.

"Taxpayers are backing (federally insured) mortgages that have been referred to as "the new sub-prime," with good reason, because they have taken on the role of insuring these risky low down payment loans where a borrower has far too little "skin in the game,' " Osborne added.

The probe comes at a time when the FHA mortgage insurance program represents a significant percentage of mortgages written in the nation.

"That the FHA continues to require such a small down payment, of only 3.5 percent, certainly flies in the face of sound risk management practices in light of everything we've learned in the past few years," Osborne said.

Options available to the HUD OIG are audits, investigations, inspections and evaluations. HUD can also levy administrative sanctions such as suspensions, limited denial of participation, debarment, and civil monetary penalties. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), state and local law enforcers can pursue civil and criminal legal actions against any wrongdoers.

"The FHA market share has skyrocketed," said Donohue.

"Our job is oversight. We work for the American taxpayer. Each loan on this list will be thoroughly examined and we will track down the reasons why it failed. Once we determine the causes, we will look to see whether there is a need for further review or remedial action. We want to send a message to the industry that as the mortgage landscape has shifted we are watching very carefully and that we are poised to take action against bad performers," he added.

Stevens said additional policy steps, to be announced later this month, are underway to hold FHA lenders accountable for high rates of default.

"The HUD OIG identified these direct endorsement companies from an analysis of loan data focusing on companies with a significant number of claims, a certain loan underwriting volume, a high ratio of defaults and claims compared to the national average, and claims that occurred earlier in the life of the mortgage. These are key indicators of problems at the origination or underwriting stages. The HUD OIG wants to see why these loans failed," Stevens said.

Image: HUD logo. (HUD)

For more info: 
Broderick Perkins, operates the Silicon Valley-based DeadlineNews Group digital news service. Get the feed from the Deadline Newsroom

Perkins is the National
Consumer News Examiner
Offbeat News Examiner

Real Estate News Examiner

Don't miss a story here. Hit the "Subscribe" button up top, near my mug shot on this page and get emailed each time a new story breaks.

Use the "More About" keywords below to search for related news.

Comments (2)

  • by SaveyourHome 7 months ago

    When are the Feds are going after NON fha mortgage companies with questionably high rates of foreclosures on homes they finance?

    The Feds are really on to something...this is main reason for the foreclosure crisis today...many of the lenders took out mortgage insurance on pools of loans, illegally. But they did disclose this to the investor and called it a "credit enhancement". This is why they lose all the paperwork, and work so hard NOT to work with the homeowner, even when the property value has fallen to 50-60% of the value. The goal is to foreclose, collect the illegal mortgage insurance, and sell the home and get those profits too. They have the orig. down payment, all the int. and princ. payments, and fees too. Our lawmakers are letting them make a killing, as they defrauded the homeowners and the investors...but at least the investors were warned of all the risks in the prospectus when they purchased the risky bonds. Radian mort. ins. covers up to 60% of home value.

  • by BEENTHERE 7 months ago

    I recently won a court order settlement agreement with a Lender that failed to follow their investor's requirements. The investor is FHA and the Bank has the premises because it is a FHA loan that they don't have to abide by FHA guidelines. They failed to have certain papers signed and are in non-complaince. The agreement meant nothing to them as they hold the paper, but as I understand they must follow ALL guidelines to insure the loan. Because they are in non-complaince, after a year of litigation, I have to go back to court and fight the possibility of foreclosure again. I followed all the terms of the agreement but the Bank proceeds as though they are exempt. By the way, the Bank also did not hold proof of "holder in due course" when push came to shove and they were ordered to provide proof. They had a attorney file paperwork but never expected a fight. The Fed's did not help me, I had to help myself, and when I tried to report the Bank, no one wanted to hear.

What do you think?

Already a member? Log in to Examiner.com. or connect with Facebook to comment

Please do not alter this field

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!