We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 55°F: Current condition: Overcast See Extended Forecast

Energy from a different perspective


This picture shows a model of a hydrogen car on a model of a 250fold enlargement of a hydrogen
storage device. Hydrogen, it turns out, was never completely out of the race as green energy's answer
to the petroleum-driven car. Now Israeli scientists and entrepreneurs claim to have
brought hydrogen energy a step closer by putting it in much smaller, lighter containers.
(AP Photo/Michael Sohn)

WASHINGTON - May 2, 2010 - We usually think of fossil fuels as energy sources. Fuels of all kinds are not sources of energy, but actually are storage devices for energy. Think of them as a kind of battery. This may, at first, seem like a very small distinction without a difference.

Think of a battery:
Recently, a spokesperson from the Hydrogen Association explained that all “fuels” are not really sources of energy at all, but more exactly carrier mediums. Energy (the ability to exert a force) is stored inside fossil fuels and many other materials.

Changes the problem:
The notion of fuel as an energy storage medium revolutionizes the problem to be solved. Transient energy surrounds us. It exists in natural wave action, wind, sunlight, heat from the earth, gravity, and especially in the glue that holds atoms together.

Energy developments:
Over millennia, man learned to free the energy stored from plants and animals, in rocks, and in liquids buried in the earth. He learned to burn wood, animal oils, coal, petroleum, and gas, releasing heat to do work. During the 19th century, the effects of gravity on water were put to work. Uses for electricity were discovered and ways to make it from heat and falling water enhanced our lives. More recently, scientists discovered how to access power in the glue that holds atoms together and generate electricity.

Fuels:
All this stuff in the ground is a finite resource. People worry that pools of oil from which energy is pumped to run machines will eventually run out. It already has run out in some places. Gaining access to reserves has become more expensive. Market forces make scarce commodities increase in value. Much of the easily available oil lives in parts of the world where America is not very popular.

Prosperity:
Prosperity usually has to do with the accumulation of value. Imagine America’s potential value as a large, empty barrel with an opening at the top to pour value in, a relief valve on the side close to the top, and a spigot at the bottom. For 400 years, Americans have added value through the top of the barrel. At first, the settlers used mostly resources from here at home. They became prosperous.

When the value in the barrel got to a certain level, it came out the side through the relief valve into another container. We packed up the container and exported it to other countries. They sent back some of their value and America got a bigger barrel.

Opening the spigot:
As America became rich, it exhausted some of the resources it had used to create value. The spigot at the bottom of the barrel opened and value started to drain out. America was forced to buy resources from others in the same way foreign countries had purchased excess value (exports) from Americans. Worse, other countries now compete for the same limited resources (read fuel) and the cost goes up. The spigot today drains existing value faster than new value can be created to refill it. Eventually, America’s value barrel will run dry unless a new way can be found to fill it.

After heat from fire and cooking, the first transient energy man learned to use was wind. It pushed his sailing ships from one place to another. Later, people learned to cook using the sun. The problem with wind is it doesn’t blow all the time. The problem with sun is it doesn’t shine all the time. Man retains this original challenge. A common sense way must be found to take all that natural energy around us and find a way to store it so it can be trotted out on rainy days, at night, or when the wind doesn’t blow. When America finds a way to store transient energy for later use, it can close the spigot on the bottom of the barrel and value will accumulate again.

Measuring success:
How will success be measured? The most commonly used measure is called a BTU. A BTU is the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of a pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit. We know how to capture energy in storable forms. Up until now, conversion of this transient energy into something that can run machines has been more expensive than the value of the energy stored.

America has not been very efficient about grabbing free energy from the planet and distributing it as electricity. Up to 30 percent of electricity is lost in transmission. This will improve as a smart grid is rebuilt.

Barriers:
The true barriers to harnessing natural energy sources are two. The first barrier is technological. Time will solve most of this problem. The second barrier is harder. Storing energy in batteries and liquefied gases for times when the sun isn’t shining and the wind isn’t blowing has been un-economic.

Demand for energy varies with the hour of the day and the season of the year. As a result, all power generation facilities have been deliberately overbuilt so that peak demands can be serviced. Power plants need on/off switches to meet peak demand. Expensive fuel is added when demand is high.

The Cape Cod contribution:
The wind farm approved off Cape Cod last week will run at an average of 38 percent of capacity (182 megawatts). Suppose all that extra capacity could be harnessed when not needed and stored away for later and to drive your car. There is little to no incremental cost incurred by running wind farm power plants at maximum capacity all the time. Storing BTUs as hydrogen made by electrolysis from water and electricity makes the process (electrolysis) economically feasible.

The same logic works with hydroelectric, solar, wave action, nuclear, and geothermal generation stations.

According to the government, Americans use about 100 quadrillion BTUs each year. Only about 25 quadrillion BTUs originate from fuels imported from outside the U.S. This one small wind farm is capable of generating about 10 trillion BTUs. Some can be used to power the standard electric grid as intended. Because of the new wind generation, some oil and natural gas produced domestically can be repurposed for vehicles.

The world will not change tomorrow:
Internal combustion engines are going to be with us for a long time to come. Exploration for domestic sources of fuel must continue. Offshore drilling is necessary, but more problematical until it can be made safer.

Critics:
Nuclear stations power 80 percent of France’s electrical need. Critics have questioned the value of wind, solar, geothermal, and bio-fuel and characterized these plants as ugly and inefficient. Maximizing these new, free, transient energy sources if stored energy can be produced  changes everything. When looked at using generally applicable measures, it becomes easier to see how the spigot at the bottom of the old value barrel can be turned off.

Hydrogen:
Hydrogen is an interesting material. It can be burned like fossil fuels and produce energy in the same old way. It can also be used to create electricity in fuel cells. The most appealing aspect of fuel cells is their waste product; water.

Both Iceland and Brazil made the decision to be energy independent some years ago. Brazil used biomass to make alcohol. Iceland used geothermal energy to make hydrogen. The Icelandic experiment was a success until they realized that a source for affordable hydrogen fuel cell cars did not yet exist. Time has passed and affordable hydrogen vehicles are on the horizon.

Benefits:
The potential for solutions exists. American jobs will be created building and maintaining hydrogen plants and infrastructure. Hydrogen will be sold and add to GDP. Outflows of American value can be eliminated or reduced. The need to send troops to protect supply is minimized. Increased economic activity can act to mitigate existing debt.

A small distinction can make a huge difference.


Al Portner is a former daily newspaper editor and publisher in seven states and author of the forthcoming “Mark Twain and the Tale of Grant’s Memoir.” Portner is also the proprietor of The Assignment Desk, LLC and provides writers, editors, and photographers for numerous kinds of contract projects from proposals and speeches to public relations and journalism. Reach him at alanportner@gmail.com.

Advertisement

By

DC Public Policy Examiner

Al Portner has 35 years of experience as an editor and publisher of daily newspapers and expertise in writing about media, business, politics,...

Comments

  • WIlliam Ernest Schenewerk 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    If 10 billions are to live like 1 billion now do, World energy production must go from 5 TWe equivalent to 50 TWe equivalent. Onshore wind nameplate is ~0.1 kg-Fe/W and runs ~1/4 of the time. Just about any storage system recovers half the input energy. Add power lines and onshore wind energy is ~1.0 kg-Fe/W averaged over time. This contrasts to ~0.1 kg-Fe/W for atomic piles, ultracritical coal or natural-gas fired CCGT.
    Offshore wind is claimed to have better than 25% utilization, but material input is also closer to 0.2 kg-Fe/W nameplate.
    Generating 50 TWe at 1.0 kg-Fe/W using wind energy requires at least 50 years iron production, assuming a useful storage system can be developed anytime soon. So far none has. Large windmills, just like tall buildings, gain mass faster than they gain power or floorspace. Construction of 50 TWe using "renewable energy" will take 100 years, based on material content alone. End of planet. Real choice is do coal, do nukes or do without.

  • Al Portner 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Good comment William. Of course, wind is not the only answer, but the only way any of this works is if secondary storage and manufacturing facilities are located near existing, unused capacity and if that unused capacity constructed for peak demand can be used without the expenditure of additional fuel. Nuclear, wind, solar, geothermal, and wave action all work. The object is energy independence for America... not powering the world. Climate change is a whole different discussion. And one where agreement will be a lot harder to achieve. For now, let's just aim to stop sending money to people who don't like us very much and sending troops in harm's way.

  • Tom 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    I don't know how much of this to believe. Just the basic statement that we can use the 62% of the referenced wind farm's unused capacity for other purposes shows that the author is not knowledgeable about some or all aspects of this article. The wind farm only produces 38% of installed capacity because that is how much wind is available. There is no left over energy to be used.

  • Al Portner 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Hi Tom - All power plants are overbuilt for peak demand. They are designed to produce enough energy to satisfy your need on the hottest day of the year with your air conditioning running full blast. Most of the time we don't need all the capacity built in. Using extra conventional fuel during times when electricity is not needed would be costly and unnecessary. So operators throttle their plants back.

    Wind, solar, wave action, geothermal, hydroelectric, and nuclear energy plants don't require extra fuel to produce extra energy. I suggest we use it.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...