| Send to Printer | << Back to Article |
| Letters |
|
Letters: July 4, 2006
Can’t smokers wait 30 minutes while they eat before lighting up?I had worked in the retail business before, and yes, there may not be any smoking in stores, but the money just isn’t as great as waiting tables or bartending. And it wouldn’t have made a difference where I went to wait tables, because in Baltimore County (I went to Towson University), there is still smoking in restaurants. So my choice was, make no money and be healthy, or make money and be sick. Although, many restaurants have banned smoking in their seating areas or in designated areas, do you think the smoke itself pays any attention to the ban? Who wants the taste of smoke with their food? I can see it now … tonight’s special: Pan-seared salmon served with your choice of side, all served with a hint of cigarette smoke. Yummy … sounds appetizing. I now reside in Howard County, and I can’t tell you how wonderful it is to go out to eat and come home without the smell of stale cigarettes all over my clothes and my hair. Is it so hard to not have a cigarette for 30 minutes while you eat? That’s all we non-smokers ask. Let’s fix the real problems in societyKeep it simple, and keep government out of it. Gradually and naturally, smoking will wither. The tobacco industry will find alternative ways to make money and employ people, and the few smokers left can grow their own, roll their own and smoke in the own backyard. Hopefully, this will please everyone so we can then move on to fix the real problems in our society like hatred, ignorance, intolerance, poverty and violence. Smoking should be banned throughout the stateWhat can I do as a health care provider to promote and/or to help to implement this bill for non-smoking in bars and restaurants? I have been to other states that enforce the smoking ban. What a difference it makes not inhaling someone else’s cigarettes. My husband and I can actually sit at a bar and eat without getting sick from the smoking habits of others. I went to a popular restaurant in Delaware just after it became smoke-free, and the waitress said business slowed for a week, but it’s back to being packed. Smokers could have taken their business just 3 miles away to Maryland, but apparently they did not. The New York Times committed treasonCould you imagine in 1944 a major newspaper disclosing that the United States and Great Britain were sending false codes to the Germans (our enemies) prior to D-day to make them think we were going to invade France at another location? And then disclosing the codes? It would be unheard of. Times have changed (pun intended), unfortunately. Nothing is off limits anymore. Granted, The Los Angeles Times and The Wall Street Journal also ran the story. But only after The New York Times ran it first and opened the floodgates. There was no need for this secret program to be made public, unless The Times had an agenda to make President Bush and the Republicans look like spies in an election year. The Times should be tried for treason and held accountable. Fat chance in this day and age. |