It's no secret that overweight people are among those in our society that have to overcome bias. We've all heard stories of overweight people being passed over for the slender person. Should there be a bias in the hiring of an overweight person, even if they're well qualified for the job?
What if it's the Surgeon General of the United States? If the surgeon general is supposed to be the most important face of public health in the United States, how can we have a surgeon general is at an unhealthy weight?
Simply put, Is Regina Benjamin too fat to be surgeon general? That's a pretty indelicate question.
Recently nominated by Barack Obama, Regina Benjamin has impeccable credentials:.jpg)
--She's spent most of her professional life serving residents in a poor, rural Alabama coastal community. She makes house calls, pays for patients' medicines, works for free when there is no money. Simply put, she's a family doctor.
--She's rebuilt a clinic destroyed by Katrina, and again when it was destroyed by fire. She's part of the community.
--She's received praised form her peers and received countless honors including a MacArthur genius award. She's respected within her professional community.
And she's overweight. Surf the online community and you find bloggers debating about her BMI. They argue that the person to be the face of medicine in America shouldn't be fat. (Benjamin reportedly wears a size 18.) Anti-fat folks question whether an overweight person should be speaking about the nation's public health in a nation plagued by obesity.
But even some medical professionals have raised the issue saying it sends the wrong message.
We have a government telling us that if you're 40 pounds overweight (like Ms. Benjamin, we're told), you're at risk to all sorts of health problems: Coronary disease, diabetes, respiratory or circulatory issues. If the government is now saying it's not that big a deal since we've appointed a person who is obese, that would be a change, right?
It's a "pot calling the kettle black" argument. How can a person whose weight presents clear health risks speak on matters of public health? The anti-fat brigade says such a person should be fit, lean and in the kind of shape we all ought to be --a public face of what healthy should look like.
I'm more interested in her professional acumen than her personal appearance, but the argument here is that this has nothing to do with her ability; it has to do with how seriously people take the message and the person in this job should be setting an example.
There are probably other parts of the debate. We live in a superficial nation when it comes to looks, and we might not be having this discussion if the appointee was a man instead of a woman. And we may have a general ambivalence about the matter based on our own vague notions of what a surgeon general does: "What does a surgeon general do?" "I don't know, so who cares if she's fat?"
She could, perhaps, say publicly that she's comfortable with her weight, addressing a psychological issue about people's attitude with weight thereby. "Yeah, I'm overweight; so what? That's me. I'm a good doctor. That's what you want."
Or she could go the Oprah route and go on a very public diet
It doesn't bother me but you might disagree.
Should a country plagued by obesity have an above average-weight woman speaking on matters of public health? Or does it matter?
Is the surgeon general nominee too fat to be surgeon general?
Daily Deal for Los Angeles
51% off
9-Disc Language-Learning System
As evidenced by cute-as-a-button viral videos, babies speak their own specialized language. Luckily, today's deal from My...
Join Examiner.com on Facebook
Comments
What nonsense. What we are seeing is the future.
Fat Police, thought police, soda police etc. A POLICE STATE! Only encouraged and promoted by this Fascist Obama administration.
Hussein: Sounds like you read the wrong article.
anorexic says: "Hussein: Sounds like you read the wrong article."
No, I just think it is stupid to make such a claim and it is further proof of the ______Police as I mentioned. (fill in the blank)
What claim are you talking about?
Being so obviously overweight hardly sends the proper message as the Surgeon General of the United States.
It reminds me of my family doctor who, with an open pack of smokes in his shirt pocket, lectured me on the evils of smoking.
DRH says: Being so obviously overweight hardly sends the proper message as the Surgeon General of the United States.
I get that, but there's no question she's qualified, at least medically. I also seem to remember that C Everett Koop has been considered an outstanding surgeon general and he was overweight, too.
Hey Mames - All I can say is that if we allow idiots like Jessie Ventura and Al Franken and good old Arnold to be Govenors and Senators, well then why does it matter if an intelligent person who spent their life learning how to save lives and be a good "lifestyle" example for other to mentor be a risk in such a position to this nation. Only she knows if she is personally comfortable with herself, and as long as she can project herself as a good role model to this nation of fast food eaters and poor health care habits properly, I say welcome her aboard.
Hey Mames - There weren't any overweight people at Art and Design now were there?
Mitchell says: All I can say is that if we allow idiots like Jessie Ventura and Al Franken and good old Arnold to be Govenors and Senators, well then why does it matter if an intelligent person who spent their life learning how to save lives and be a good "lifestyle" example for other to mentor be a risk in such a position to this nation. Only she knows if she is personally comfortable with herself, and as long as she can project herself as a good role model to this nation of fast food eaters and poor health care habits properly, I say welcome her aboard.
Hard to argue that point, and I can speak first hand on Arnold since I'm watching that mess up close. UTSA!
Hussein actually believes that the Obama administration intends to destroy everything positive about the USA (as (s)he sees it). Nothing that you or I can say will discourage this belief, but might strengthen it. At best, the rest of us are sheeple, at worst, we're in on the conspiracy.
As for the article, I think it's spot-on. Before you can claim that you're going to take on issues like childhood obesity and rising rates of type 2 diabetes, you should clearly understand what causes them and be able to control those factors in your own life. Clearly, she either does not understand the factors involved or doesn't feel able to control them in her life.
I suspect that she thinks that we need kids to eat more low-fat food and to lecture people on reducing caloric intake, which is the exact same advice that got us where we are. The science is out there, but the "standard advice" doesn't match up.
YES, SHE'S TOO FAT--ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS LOOK!
WHAT A ROLE MODEL!
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!