There are many ways to play online, but few (okay, none) offer the promise of the big pay day like multi-table tournaments (MTTS). You can spend a couple hours at a ring game or two, where doubling your stack is cause for celebration (as you get raked into oblivion); while away for an hour or so at a five or ten dollar one table sit-n-go and take down $22.50 and $45 respectively for outlasting the other eight competitors; or you can pony up as little as $5 to take a shot at a cool thousand or more.
With dirt-cheap satellites available for virtually all of the bigger buy in MTTs, you can conceivably win tens of thousands of dollars for an entry fee so small that it's almost statistically insignificant, so ignore the significance of that $2 satellite, 'cause there isn't any.
If you’re like me, the prospect of turning $5 into a grand is quite alluring. If you’re ready to conquer the world of MTTs, or at least maximize the potential payout for your scant few dollars, you need to be aware of a few things.
The Good
Huge paydays. You can bust out twenty MTTs on the first hand, make a final table on your next attempt, and you’re still significantly ahead…but maybe fold the first hand once in a while. Fail a lot, make a final table once, and all your sins and past transgression are wiped away, not to mention your bankroll can suddenly get all Herculean on your ass.
I recently turned $7 into $350, which is simply ridiculous math, so don’t even bother. While it's not impossible to do this playing ring games or one table sit-n-gos, pack a lunch, because it’s going to take a long time. Turning $7 into $350 took seven hours; thanks to MTTs, I made $50 per hour, at least on that particular hour. We’ll choose to ignore my less impressive results for purposes of this article pls/k/thx.
The Bad
Making a final table in a field of 700 players will usually take between four and five hours. However, unlike a ring game in which you bust out, there is no rebuy – if you get knocked out one off the money, you wasted hours of your life just to lose your buy in so gg loser.
Also, to outlast such a large number of opponents, you’ll have to dodge plenty of maniacs who will raise your blinds every turn, go all in at any time (and often for no discernable reason), and in between, you’ll be folding a lot. You need patience and discipline to fold the chaff, resist the all in egg-ons of either crazy or wily opponents, and lastly, you’ll need to win your share of coin flips.
The Ugly
You can play tremendous poker for three and a half hours, make one mistake, and fall from the top ten to the bottom ten, with very little hope of climbing back.
I was recently dealt KK on the small blind. Everyone folded around to me, I three bet, and the big blind raised all in (about ½ of my stack). After I called, it was revealed that the big blind had, you guessed it: AA. I’ve been playing quite a while now, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen KK and AA together in the blinds. Of course I lost, took a large hit, and wasn’t able to recover. But I mean, c’mon, who doesn’t push in that situation? One instance of bad timing, one huge suckout, or an extended crappy run of cards at a hyper-aggressive table, and you, too, could meet the rail.
For the previous three hours I was playing out of my mind: making excellent laydowns, snapping off bluffs and taking down pots with absolute garbage. Every decision I made was the right one. But then.
So… You can make big money for a small financial investment, but it’ll cost you a lot of time… and you’d better be prepared to gear down and play your best poker, make good bets, calls and better laydowns, win coin flips and dodge big suckouts, maniacs and suicidal players…
On second thought, don’t bother with MTTs, keep playing your ring games and paying the rake that generates profit for the site, which can then continue to operate, which can then continue to hold MTTS, so I can continue to brave the elements and enter them to my heart’s, and bankroll’s content.










Comments
John,
I'm a firm believer in MTTs and satellites to score big cash prizes for a small investment and to win seats in bigger events for a fraction of the cost. They are basically all I play online. I can win a seat into the Sunday Million on PokerStars for an average of $9 (I've done this numerous times in a $3 rebuy) and have a chance to win the top prize of $250,000 or so. The most I've won so far is $1600, but even at that, talk about return on investment! Or I can play a $2 rebuy to win a seat to Stars' PCA tournament in the Bahamas with a weeek's paid vacation and a $10,000 buy-in, which I did last year.
This is not to brag, but to tell your readers--MTTs and satellites to bigger events are the way to go. I'm working on winnning a WSOP seat now. See you there!
Rebekah Mercer, Poker Examiner Oklahoma City
Forget to tell you this, John. I like your columns a lot and the remarks in the Info Box are the best!
Hi John
i`m playing poker on facebook - taggrd - myspace.
on tagged i got my 1ste 100k and yes i was proud that i got there after playing for 2 months now.
but rhere are stil thing i dont understand.
i know like i saw it happen....
i pair bets 2 pairs but i saw that 3 pairs bet a straight if i`m right and a full house takes a trip if the cards r higher... and a flush takes al els. am i right...
cause i had at a time 3 A`s that lost ag a flush. i now dont play A`s or AK cause thers always some1 that got beter.
hey john, i'm the new poker examiner for las vegas ... quick note to let you know that i've added you to my examiner sidebar and appreciate the add-back ... (would've sent you an email, but couldn't find your address) ... thanks, m.
@the red: added back, yo.
@Petro: I did a little playing on Facebook, which basically consisted of folding for an hour then leaving. Too many nuts. However, not playing aces or kings is sure suicide. Fire those checkers in!
@Rebekah: Big fan of your stuff as well, though your track record at MTTs crushes mine. I hit a couple hundred a few times, but always seem to peter out right before the big money.
Thanks for the comments, peeps.
Great article, John.... I definitely agree that MTT's offer a nice risk-reward ratio, I do find that, as you pointed out in "The Ugly," they can be a huge investment in time if you just miss the bubble. I've played some of the 20-table MTTs, only to finish a few spots out of the money, which can be maddening. Three four hours of great play, for nothing...
Personally, I like the sweet spot of 3-, 5-, and 10-table MTTs... Beating 27, 45, or 90 players is still a challenge, and offers a nice payout if you make the final table. They also can be played, start-to-finish, within a few hours. If you miss the money, you've only invested an hour or two...
RNQXxSrN
HQfgyW http://dphhfv.com/ WyhSqrQW [url=http://tdbqml.com/]WyhSqrQW[/url]
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!