WASHINGTON
(Map)
-
WASHINGTON, June 1 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- From the National Press Club banquet hall work area, following former Vice President Dick Cheney's speech and answers:
"The gaps and deferrals in Cheney's speech and responses are overwhelming. His speech today and his other recent appearances leave huge holes and questions about his role in waterboarding, torture, wiretapping, U.S. attorney-firing, and Iraq decisions including WMD," says ex-White House and Congress spokesman
Bob Weiner.
"Here are questions the press and Congress should ask the former Vice President," said Weiner. Weiner attended Cheney's lunch speech, just concluded, at the National Press Club today, and is a Club member, national columnist, and radio analyst following his 20+ years as a spokesman for the Clinton White House and Congress including for Judiciary Chair John Conyers and Congressmen Charles Rangel, Claude Pepper, and Ed Koch. Weiner helped develop and prepare many congressional investigations. At the Press Club, Cheney said he'll be doing a book of "Memoirs... to set the record straight." To do so, he needs to answer:
-- "How is waterboarding not a crime when we've regularly and
often prosecuted for it in the past and our courts have found the people
who have done it guilty and given them prison sentences?
-- "Did you visit CIA headquarters at Langley to urge intelligence
personnel to focus on making the case that Iraq had WMD's?
-- "Did you have meetings at the White House in which you urged White
House and DOJ staff to make the case that waterboarding and other
enhanced interrogation was not criminal?
-- "Is there a bit of the Shakespearean 'methinks the lady doth
protest too much' in all your recent TV appearances making the case
that you were right about changing the definition of torture, allowing
unauthorized wiretaps, and claiming everyone thought Iraq had
WMD's? Should we assume all trails led to the Vice President?
-- "Even though you have said most of the world's intelligence
agencies also thought Iraq had WMD's, isn't that true only
because they used to follow our lead, at least until we were so wrong
about this?
-- "Why did you focus on Iraq when the al Qaeda brain trust that
attacked us wasn't mainly there but in Afghanistan?
-- "Why are you changing the accepted protocol that the last president
and vice president give a non-criticized year to the next one... and why
is President Bush honoring this tradition while you are not?
-- "Why do you say only three were waterboarded when over 100 deaths
of young healthy males at Abu Ghraib had no autopsies according to your
colleague former Vice President Gore -- and aren't those deaths
likely from forms of extreme interrogation?
-- "Is it proper that the CIA destroyed the tapes of likely evidence
of torture? And should a judge see the still photos as possible evidence
of obstruction of justice and violation of both DOJ and congressional
instructions not to destroy tapes?
-- "You've said one in seven released Guantanamo detainees went
back to fighting us, but how many would have done so without harsh
interrogation?
-- "Do you believe no al Qaeda was recruited by the propaganda value
to them of our torturing their prior detainees?
-- "If we didn't torture or waterboard captured German Nazis in
World War Two, why do so for enemies now?
-- "NPR reported that many Guantanamo prisoners were placed there
because opponents were given money for supposedly exposing terrorists,
and in the beginning as many as 90% were innocent and were there
improperly for years, even the editors of the Afghanistan equivalent of
'The Onion'. Can you say that the military is not keeping any
innocent people in Guantanamo now?
-- "Put the terror threat in perspective -- Do you think the 3000
killed by al Qaeda is more serious than the deaths and concentration
camps during Nazi Germany's rampage? If not, what makes this so
unprecedented that we would drastically reduce civil liberties from the
American model to the world?"
Contact: Bob Weiner/Zoe Pagonis 202-329-1700 or 301-283-0821
