Today the House passed the democrat's health care bill. Is this even news? Of course it was going to pass the House, which is more liberal than the Senate. The big news is the narrow margin by which it was passed: 220-215. Barely. If what was thought to be a sure thing barely made it, then what are the chances of getting it in the more conservative Senate with the filibuster-ready Republicans and Joe Lieberman?
Nancy Pelosi said afterwards: “Without President Obama in the White House, this victory would not have been possible. He provided the vision and the momentum for us to get the job done for the American people.”
Really? President Obama did little more than nothing. The White House wouldn't support a plan nor pressure any opposition. It had been mentioned that the President "prefers" the public option, yet he took little steps to secure it. His neglected supporting a plan, instead making vague statements about there being many ways to go about health care reform. That may be true, but it certainly isn't helpful. When Harry Reid asked Obama to pressure opposing Senators just a little, he wouldn't. Obama said from the beginning that he was leaving it up to the Congress to produce a bill. That's what happened, and he doesn't deserve the credit.
Of course the Republicans hated it. All, but one voted against it. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) said: "This is perhaps the worst bill I have seen come to the floor in my 11 years in Congress". No surprise there.
In order to get the last bit of support for the bill, Pelosi had to allow a vote on the Stupak amendment, which passed, banning the public option from covering abortions. I knew this was bound to be in the bill, and I was actually surprised it took so long to get in there. However, one thing I did not know about the Stupak Amendment is that it prevents private insurance companies from receiving government subsidies if they cover abortions. That is outrageous.
It's a terrible thing. Though, still a concession I accept if that's what it takes to get a decent bill otherwise.
Fortunately, the Tea Party protest going on outside failed to influence enough representatives into believing they represented American interests.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29282.html
Comments
This bill is outrageous. On page 94 it says that it is prohibited to have a private healthcare plan by 2013. It is wrong and tyrannical.
It is a sad sad day for the US. To pass such a bill, that is giving the goverment such sweeping control of your healthcare is outrageous!
Dylan, I want to hear you say it is 'Decent" if it totally passes and you are paying the outrageous prices and still waiting inline to see a doctor, one THEY chose.
And it does NOT ban the public option of covering Abortions...it just shifted that to a rider that women can purchase on the Public option.
Do not underestimate the Tea Party's ...The fight is not over.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with this bill, one cannot argue that it is, in fact, unconstitutional. Whether or not the government should have a role in health care is a debate that should be taking place at the state level.
I am sure Stupak is a concession you can accept... since does not affect you and trades away the right of others to get what you want.
Paula,
I can understand your criticism, though I assure you that sacrificing abortion rights is one of the last things I'd be willing to do. It affects everyone, and the right to choose is not negotiable. If the health care bill carried with it an amendment banning abortion entirely, I would, without hesitation, be against it. But, it doesn't; it just restricts insurance coverage of it. I realize that not covering abortions will cause (and has caused) hardship for many women, and that this lack of coverage could be a form of discrimination. However, that has to be weighed against everything else. A poor woman may not have abortion coverage, but at least maybe she can afford insurance for her other needs.
Nobody is more pro-choice than me.
So, if abortions were to be covered by the gov't health care bill and private insurance and offered to those who typically cannot afford it; it just might have decreased the number of women on welfare. Just a thought.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!