It seems a little early to be talking about the 2012 Presidential election but certain political trends that have been witnessed over the past year point to the possibility of a shakeup already in the works. The third entry in .jpg)
The released data shows a cumulative rating of 57.6% for Obama during his first calendar year in office. That is considerably higher than the President’s average approval rating over the past several months from
None the less the recent study is a helpful way to track where the President is most and least popular at a state by state level. Since the approval for a President does not rise and fall evenly between states with the changing political landscape it’s generally not a good idea to speculate what Obama’s current job approval ratings are at a state level. If we average the President’s approval rating over the past several weeks as being 50%, at least according to
For hypothetical purposes only we can then apply that 12.5% decline to each state and perhaps get a better read on the current levels of approval for President Obama across the electorate. The table below shows Obama’s approval rating in each state for 2009, our adjusted ratings for 2010, his popular vote margin from 2008 and the difference between that election and his current figures.
State 2008 Election 2009 Approval 2010 Adjusted % Change
Oklahoma 34.4 48.0 42.0 +7.6
Utah 34.2 47.8 41.8 +7.6
Kentucky 41.2 52.8 46.2 +5.0
Alabama 38.7 49.1 43.0 +4.3
South Carolina 44.9 56.1 49.1 +4.2
Arkansas 38.9 49.2 43.1 +4.2
South Dakota 44.8 55.8 48.8 +4.0
North Dakota 44.5 55.3 48.4 +3.9
Louisiana 39.9 50.0 43.8 +3.9
Wyoming 32.5 41.6 36.4 +3.9
Tennessee 41.8 51.8 45.3 +3.5
Kansas 41.6 51.4 45.0 +3.4
Arizona 44.9 54.7 47.9 +3.0
Alaska 37.9 46.0 40.3 +2.4
Mississippi 43.0 51.8 45.3 +2.3
Nebraska 41.6 50.2 43.9 +2.3
Idaho 35.9 43.3 37.9 +2.0
Georgia 46.9 55.6 48.7 +1.8
Texas 43.6 51.9 45.4 +1.8
Minnesota 54.1 61.5 53.8 -0.3
Missouri 49.2 55.5 48.6 -0.6
Florida 50.9 56.8 49.7 -1.2
North Carolina 49.7 55.4 48.5 -1.2
Indiana 49.9 55.3 48.4 -1.5
New Jersey 57.1 63.0 55.1 -2.0
Virginia 52.6 57.7 50.5 -2.1
Connecticut 60.6 66.7 58.4 -2.2
West Virginia 42.5 45.9 40.2 -2.3
Ohio 51.4 55.3 48.4 -3.0
Massachusetts 61.8 66.8 58.5 -3.3
Iowa 53.9 57.7 50.5 -3.4
New York 62.9 67.2 58.8 -4.1
Pennsylvania 54.5 57.4 50.2 -4.3
Rhode Island 62.9 66.6 58.3 -4.6
Michigan 57.3 60.2 52.7 -4.6
Illinois 61.9 65.2 57.1 -4.8
Montana 47.1 48.1 42.1 -5.0
Washington 56.2 58.4 51.1 -5.1
California 60.9 63.7 55.7 -5.2
Maine 57.7 59.4 52.0 -5.7
Wisconsin 56.2 57.7 50.5 -5.7
Nevada 55.2 55.9 48.9 -6.3
New Hampshire 54.1 54.6 47.8 -6.3
Oregon 56.8 57.6 50.4 -6.4
Colorado 53.7 52.3 45.8 -7.9
New Mexico 56.9 55.9 48.9 -8.0
Vermont 67.5 67.7 59.2 -8.3
Delaware 61.9 61.1 53.5 -8.4
Hawaii 71.9 70.8 62.0 -9.9
Maryland 61.9 58.5 51.2 -10.7
D.C. 92.5 90.2 78.9 -13.6
TOTAL 52.9 57.2 50.0 -2.9
The above data points to the possibility that most of President Obama’s losses of late have been in solidly “blue” states from 2008. This should comfort supporters knowing that many of the built-in electoral advantages from that election appear to be safely in tact. On the flip side however the vast majority of post-election gains for the President appear to be in states where his approval rating is already low and where he was not competitive in 2008. In between we have several states that, if they follow current trends, could be in play for 2012 where they were viewed as solid or likely wins for Obama shortly after his resounding victory in 2008.
For classification purposes lets place every state where President Obama currently has an approval rating exceeding 58% in the “safe” column. Those where his job approval is less than 58% but greater than 53% are “likely” for the President. States where Obama registers below 47% but greater than 42% would be “unlikely” victories in 2012, states where he is below 42% are solid “red” for whoever his Republican opponent turns out to be. Then we have the gray area where Obama’s current approval rating rests above 47% but below 53% for a category we’ll classify as “battleground” states.
Obama won comfortably in eleven states (CT, MA, NY, RI, IL, CA, VT, DE, HI, MD, DC) including the
The picture is similarly disturbing for the President when discussing those states that fall in the category of likely victories in 2012 when compared to his success in 2008. Against Senator John McCain then Senator Barack Obama had twelve state wins by comfortable margins of 53-58%. Although the electoral clout (110) from 2008 isn’t much different than it is now (104), Obama has just five states (MN, NJ, IL, CA, DE) he can categorize as likely to stay blue in 2012. Overall Obama won 23-states containing 263-electoral votes by more than 53% in his election victory of less than a year and a half ago. Based solely off his current approval rating that present total is just twelve-states and 168-votes strong.
Lastly we take a look at the “battleground” or “swing” states that have played a crucial role in deciding the first two elections of the past decade and may do so again in 2012. Obama had only six states (MO, FL, NC, IN, VA, MT) where he pulled in between 47-53% of the popular vote in 2008. Now in 2010 based off his currently job approval there are a whopping 29-states that fit that description. Battleground states made up just eighty-electoral votes in the last election but as of right now they are on pace to contain 227.
The President can perhaps take solace in the fact that he managed to win 23 of those 29 states currently classified as part of the electoral battleground. However nine of those states and 81-electoral votes have moved from likely Obama victories to battleground states over the course of the fifteen months since Election 2008. On the other hand of the six battleground states Obama lost in 2008 only
It is of course very early to be analyzing an electoral map scenario for 2012 especially without knowing who the President’s opponent is likely to be at that point in time. Still much of the information gathered is valuable in assessing current trends that could ultimately affect the political landscape in the coming years.
PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS / SUSAN WALSH











Comments
This analysis is silly because it ignores the political environment. All these numbers will change depending on the economy. See Reagan's numbers in early '83 when unemployment was close to 11%. He had an approval of 35%. A year and a half later he was re-elected by landslide against a weak opponent when the unemployment rate dropped 3%. Most private economic forecasts suggest that unemployment will be below 8% by mid 2012. Also, these numbers are abstract. If poll Obama against an opponent they will change.
Do you really believe that Obama will win with 50% in Maryland while improving his share of the vote in Alabama? His approval among blacks in the gallup poll is 83%. Do you really believe a Republican will win 17% of the black vote againt Obama?
By 2012, the National Popular Vote bill could guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections. Candidates would need to care about voters across the nation, not just undecided voters in a handful of swing states.
The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes--that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
The Constitution gives every state the power to allocate its electoral votes for president, as well as to change state law on how those votes are awarded.
see www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill is currently endorsed by over 1,707 state legislators (in 48 states) who have sponsored and/or cast recorded votes in favor of the bill.
In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). Support is strong in every state, party, and demographic group surveyed.
The National Popular Vote bill has passed 29 state legislative chambers, in 19 small, medium-small, medium, and large states, including one house in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oregon, and both houses in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, and Washington. These five states possess 61 electoral votes -- 23% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.
See www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill has passed 29 state legislative chambers, in 19 small, medium-small, medium, and large states, including one house in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oregon, and both houses in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, and Washington. These five states possess 61 electoral votes -- 23% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.
See www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill has passed 29 state legislative chambers, in 19 small, medium-small, medium, and large states, including one house in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oregon, and both houses in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, and Washington. These five states possess 61 electoral votes -- 23% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.
See www.NationalPopularVote.com
"Do you really believe a Republican will win 17% of the black vote againt Obama?"
A study of U of Cal Berkley:
* 3.6% of African American voters describe themselves as "extremely conservative"
* 10% of African American voters describe themselves as "conservative"
* 12.4% of African American voters describe themselves as "slightly conservative"
Mike Huckabee as Gov. of Arkansas won 43 percent (1998) & 48% percent of the black vote.
A Republican who can speak well in black churches can win these votes. John McCain was more secular so he did poorly. Obama being the first black President but also a democrat will show black folks how really out of step democrats are with their values.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!