We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 58°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Washington's Blog: Instead of creating jobs for American, Obama spends in Afghanistan, Iraq


   We hold these Truths to be self-evident...

Washington’s Blog is one of my favorite sources for revealing facts and analysis in economics and policy. The recent post, Instead of fixing the US Economy or creating jobs for AMERICANS, Obama will spend the money in Afghanistan and Iraq, is so comprehensively brilliant in putting together the documentation that our wars are fraudulent and damaging to our economy, I’m reprinting it for you.

Needless to say, I recommend following Washington’s Blog for such insightful writing! Without further ado:
 
America is in the most severe unemployment crisis since - and perhaps including - the Great Depression.

And yet Obama, like Bush, has done virtually nothing to create more jobs. Instead, they both gave trillions to the biggest banks (who are not loaning it out to the little guy) and for waging wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Obama is apparently escalating - not ending - the wars. And its not cheap.

According to the White House, the cost of deploying new soldiers to Afghanistan could be $1 million per soldier. Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz says that the Iraq war will cost $3-5 trillion dollars.

As I have previously pointed out, protracted war increases unemployment, shrinks the economy, and causes recession. See this, this and this.

But deficits don't matter, right? Wrong.
But We Had No Choice ... We Had to Fight Those Wars

But - you may say - we had no choice, we had to fight those wars because of 9/11.

Well, top British officials say that the U.S. discussed Iraq regime change long before 9/11. In fact, they say that regime change was advocated one month after Bush took office:

The chairman of the British Joint Intelligence Committee in 2001 told investigators Monday that elements of the Bush Administration were pushing for regime change in Iraq in early 2001, months before the 9/11 attacks and two years before President George W. Bush formally announced the Iraq war.
Sir Peter Ricketts, now-Secretary at the Foreign Office, said that US and British officials believed at the time that measures against Iraq were failing: "sanctions, an incentive to lift sanctions if Saddam allowed the United Weapons inspectors to return, and the 'no fly' zones over the north and south of the country."
Ricketts also said that US officials had raised the prospect of regime change in Iraq, asserting that the British weren't supportive of the idea at the time.
***
The head of the British Foreign Office's Middle East department, Sir William Patey, told the inquiry that his office was aware of regime change talk from some parts of the Bush Administration shortly after they took office in 2001.

"In February 2001 we were aware of these drum beats from Washington and internally we discussed it," Patey said. "Our policy was to stay away from that."

The Brits previously revealed that intelligence and purported facts of Iraq's weapons programs were "fixed around" the pre-set policy of invading Iraq.

It's not just the Brits.

Former CIA director George Tenet said that the White House wanted to invade Iraq long before 9/11, and inserted "crap" in its justifications for invading Iraq.

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill also says that Bush planned the Iraq war before 9/11.

Everyone knew the WMD claims were fake. For example, the number 2 Democrat in the Senate, who was on the Senate intelligence committee, admitted that the Senate intelligence committee knew before the war started that Bush's public statements about Iraqi WMDs were false. And if the committee knew, then the White House knew as well.

And Tony Blair - the British Prime Minister - knew that Saddam possessed no WMDs. If America's closest ally Britain knew, then the White House knew as well.

The CIA warned the White House that claims about Iraq's nuclear ambitions (using forged documents) were false, and yet the White House made those claims anyway.

Cheney was largely responsible for generating fake intelligence about Iraq in order to justify the war. For example:

And see this.

And you may have heard that the Energy Task Force chaired by Cheney prior to 9/11 collected maps of Iraqi oil fields and potential suitors for that oil. But you probably don't know that a secret document written by the National Security Council on February 3, 2001 directed the N.S.C. staff to cooperate fully with the Energy Task Force as it considered the “melding” of two seemingly unrelated areas of policy: “the review of operational policies towards rogue states,” such as Iraq, and “actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields”.

In other words, it is difficult to brush off Cheney's Energy Task Force's examination of Iraqi oil maps as a harmless comparison of American energy policy with known oil reserves because the N.S.C. explicitly linked the Task Force, oil, and regime change. Indeed, a former senior director for Russian, Ukrainian, and Eurasian affairs at the N.S.C. said:

If this little group was discussing geostrategic plans for oil, it puts the issue of war in the context of the captains of the oil industry sitting down with Cheney and laying grand, global plans.
(and see this).

Cheney's role in getting the U.S. into unnecessary military confrontations is not new. According to former high-level intelligence officer Melvin Goodman, during the Ford administration, Cheney orchestrated phony intelligence for the Congress in order to get an endorsement for covert arms shipments to anti-government forces in Angola.

And in the 1970's, Cheney was instrumental in generating fake intelligence exaggerating the Soviet threat in order to undermine coexistence between the U.S. and Soviet Union, which conveniently justified huge amounts of cold war spending. See also this. This scheme foreshadowed Mr. Cheney's role in generating fake intelligence in Iraq by 30 years.

And Cheney was the guy who directed all counter-terrorism activities in 2001 and who directed the U.S. response on 9/11, accidentally allowing hijacked planes to fly all over the place, and perhaps - as implied by Secretary of Transportation Norm Minetta - to slam into the Pentagon (confirmed here). Heck of a job, Dick ...

The government also apparently planned the Afghanistan war before 9/11 (see this and this).

But you don't even have to even think about all of the complex facts discussed above. It's really simple: when asked to specify exactly why we are still fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, Obama cannot really explain why we are still there.

(It's also simple because the top bipartisan experts say that the Iraq war has increasedthe threat of terrorism. See this, this, this, this, this and this).

The Wars Are Unnecessary and Are Killing the Economy

Bottom line: The wars are unnecessary, and they are draining resources which could be used to reduce unemployment and help the economy.
Note: This is not a Republican versus Democratic issue. For example, Bill Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act in 1998, calling for regime change in Iraq. And Obama is escalating wars started by the previous administration.
Advertisement

By

Nonpartisan Examiner

Carl Herman is a National Board Certified Teacher in economics, government, and history. His hobby is research, education, and lobbying for...

Comments

  • Reader 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Now that the IAEA has declared their desire to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons at a dead end, Obama is now ready to begin to consider the potentialities of possible sanctions that we might consider todiscuss with our new allies that he has reset relations with. Haha

  • Tom Dennen 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Everyone seems to forget that the business of banks is war.
    War is instant obsolescence - maw of death and destruction so profitable that the world has not been without war since the invention of Capitalism and the first financial crash, the South Sea Bubble in 1720.

    Every fifty or so years after that there has been a market crash crash followed by a depression aflanked by expensing (profiable wars

  • Ari 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    What a shame, we have pure corruption/war crimes/murder and yet NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE?

    Where are the NEW WASHINGTONS who are ready to sacrifice their blood to cleanse our nation from the evil that lurks/controls our nation.

    Our congress representatives are a scam. They represent BIG Corp. and that's it.

    We need a revolution!

  • JMcCabe 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    What happened to Americans creating their own jobs and to heck with the government? One reason the "little" business person can't hire on help is due to government regulation and taxes. That's when folks need to go it alone with the least regulation. A street vender needs permits, but after costs of operation...the rest of the cash goes in the pocket...and it's up to the vender to report to IRS how much is made. Governments change in title,(UK/USA) but intent is the same...tax them to death or kill them in wars. I believe in the Constitution...live and let live and let'em share their wealth the way they want!!!!!

  • Doug 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I think it's time for Canada and the rest of the world to sanction America for all its lies.
    And since 911 has proven itself an inside job, lady Liberty's mass public that can no longer tell left from right, a Christian community that preaches and lives the opposite of the ten commandments and proudly thinks that Jesus died so only Americans won't have to suffer during the tribulation (millions of God fearing Russians died under communism) and the most sickening part of it all is America gets away with invading other countries that never did anything to you except make you money , this makes you the most dangerously insane people the world will ever know. And I pray everyday that you will be wiped off the face of the earth by God, you whore of Babylon.

  • mondo 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    These bankers are the new world order. Tney are purposefully manipulating us to become angry with the government which in turn will make it that much easier for them to wheel in their communist utopian global government. These are the facts. Listen to William Coopers lectures which are available on Youtube and Itunes. He predicted all this and more over 10 years ago.

  • Thunderhawk 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    We all know now that Bush and Blair and their cohorts lied their countries into war and thousands have died. How is it that they are not being prosecuted for their traitorous actions?

  • Jeff 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Barack Obama is still in a campaign mode, he wants to know the public opinion before taking action, this guy lacks political will, it goes to show how cunning and clever this demagogue is.

    His campaign slogan "HOPE AND CHANGE" was a total deception, actually he (himself)is the embodiment of special interest group and lobbyist, look at the favored private company and elite individual behind him (GE,GOLDMAN SACHS AND GEORGE SOROS etc.)

    Obama is employing the tactics of his mentor Saul Alinsky,a communist who wrote the book "RULES FOR RADICALS" book he dedicated to lucifer whom he called the "first radical"

    It was Alinsky for whom "change" was his mantra in his campaign
    slogan, this had to be done through systematic deception, winning the trust of naively idealistic middle class by using the language of morality and equality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it (machiavellian).

    Barack Obama,Saul Alinsky,jeremiah Wright,William Ayer,are birds of the same feather.

  • Carl Herman (Nonpartisan Examiner) 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Great comments, everyone :)

    Thunderhawk: what's missing is law enforcement from the Executive Branch. These are obvious crimes of torture, Wars of Aggression, and massive financial fraud. Oathkeepers, state governments, federal Marshals and every man and woman in military, government, and law enforcement should exercise their lawful authority to immediately refuse and stop illegal orders and acts.

    Look up Oathkeepers. They are on the front line in this movement.

  • anonymous 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Uh oh , someone is mentioning the south sea bubble ! Don't you bafoons realize that America has made more progress , socially, and economically , then any nation, EVER ? The poor people in the western world live like kings , compared to the last billion years.

  • Carl Herman (Nonpartisan Examiner) 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    anonymous:
    You show no empathy for 22% unemployed, a million children dying from poverty every month, and two Wars of Aggression. And you are quite the willing slave to pay trillions in our tax money for these lying wars and banksters.

    Choose carefully the future you speak and work for. You are likely to have the future you choose.

  • Thunderhawk 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I think we are here mostly on the same wavelength and can make intelligent comments without resorting to fatuous name calling instead of debate as I've seen on some websites.

    Changing tack, if any other country behaved towards the rest of the world the way America and its so-called 'only ally in the middle east' there would be government-sponsored boycotts, divestments and sanctions against that country. I agree with Doug's comments about sanctions against America. Nothing gets the attention of the corporatocracy that now rules America, than finding their income drying up. Was it LBJ who said ''when you've got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will quickly follow''?

  • Carl Herman (Nonpartisan Examiner) 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Thunderhawk:
    Propagandists will comment on any site that hits too close to the damning facts. Yes, the criminal and vicious behavior is visible to all who are ready to see it.

    I tried to source the quote and failed to find a definitive one. LBJ said in his last interview that the US runs a "damn murder incorporated."

  • WAH WAH WAH Sez- 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Still at it Carl Huh? postinh your nonsensical bull shot that makes everyone mad at you. On top of that, you seem to want to debate everyone that counters your jaded socialist views.

    get a life dude, matter of fact-get areal job

  • Carl Herman (Nonpartisan Examiner) 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    wah3: evolve past ad hominem to discuss the issues or I will delete your comments.

  • Thunderhawk 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Of course, Anonymous, America has made more progress than any other nation and that would be laudable if not for the fact that it's been done at the expense of other nations. Americans, who form less than 5 per cent of the world's population account for over 30 per cent of the world's consumption, most of it wasteful. That doesn't leave a lot of the world's resources to be shared amongst the remaining 6 billion people. Perhaps, a reason for the continual wars America has had to wage to protect and maintain its level of consumption.

    I'm not certain that the 37 million Americans living in poverty will quite subscribe to your claim that they live like kings compared to the hyperbolic billion years that you mention.

  • Thunderhawk 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    It is time our military and political leaders told the truth about why we are fighting in Afghanistan, and it has little to do with bringing democracy to that unfortunate country.

    As the invasion of Afghanistan was planned before 9/11, it has little to do with finding the alleged plotter-in-chief, Bin Laden either.

    The US is fighting in Afghanistan, and planning on being there for years to come, as part of the USA's credo of 'full spectrum dominance' which primarily includes containing the two biggest threats to that dominance, China and Russia; and Iran which is allegedly an existential threat to Israel. Gaining dominance over the hydrocarbon resources of the region is part of the plan.

    So, will Obushama and his cohorts stop lying to the world that it's about fighting terrorism and tell it the real reason for the unending war. The US's allies can then decide whether sacrifice of its soldiers is worth the price.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...