Over the last year or so, there have been countless movies about the Nazis and the Holocaust, such as the “The Reader,” “Valkyrie,” “Defiance” and “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas.” A popular new film, the "Inglorious Basterds" directed by Quentin Tarantino and produced by the Weinstein brothers is promoted by Hollywood and the press as a fictional tale of a group of Jewish American GI's led by a redneck Lieutenant played by Brad Pitt, who seek vengence against the Nazi's in occupied France during WWII. Throughout the film there are many gruesome scenes of vengence, including scalpings and torture.
Eli Roth, who plays a leading role in the film as the "Bear Jew", says that the idea of vengence is "...almost a deep sexual satisfaction of wanting to beat Nazis to death, an orgasmic feeling. My character gets to beat Nazis to death. That’s something I could watch all day. My parents are very strong about Holocaust education.” On a similar note, one of the films producers, Lawrence Bender told Tarantino that “As your producing partner, I thank you, and as a member of the Jewish tribe, I thank you, motherf--ker, because this movie is a f--king Jewish wet dream.”
In the ADL Statement they say that the film "...is an allegory about good and evil and the no-holds barred efforts to defeat the evil personified by Hitler, his henchmen, and his Nazi regime. If only it were true!"
There is no need to come up with a fictional story while there is a true chapter of WWII history most people have no clue about. A Jewish American Author named John Sack risked his career and even his life to tell the story of Jews who sought revenge in his controversial book An Eye for an Eye: The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945. The story tells of Jews who oversaw prison camps in Poland under the Communist occupations. According to Sack, they not only sought revenge against German soldiers, but also innocent German and Polish civilians.
Sack states in his book that the revenge included torture and rape of women and children. Sack estimates 60-80,000 died in these camps. Sack interviewed one survivor named Lola, who was an official at the prison and lost most of her family in the Holocaust. She admited that they treated the prisoners much worse than she was treated at Auschwitz by the Nazis. Sack said "Lola at Auschwitz wasn't locked in a room night and day. She wasn't tortured night after night." She told Sack: "Thank God, nobody tried to rape us. The Germans weren't allowed to." But all of that happened to German girls at Lola's prison in Gleiwitz"
Solomon Morel who lost most of his family in the holocaust brutally oversaw the prison camp. Morel fled to Israel after the book was published. Israel has refused to extradite Morel to Poland to face war crimes.
Most major publishers refused to publish Sack's book and major media outlets ignored it once it was published. John Sack was villified by the Jewish Establishment, such as the Executive Director of the World Jewish Congress. He was labeled a self-hating Jew and even an anti-semite. Self Proclaimed fighter of Holocaust Denial, Deborah Lipstadt, stated, on "the Charlie Rose Show" that Sack was a Neo-Nazi and an anti-semite and told him personally he was worse than a holocaust denier, despite the fact that he shares the mainstream view of the holocaust.
The media and major Jewish organizations were opposed to the book because they percieved it as portraying Jews in a negative light, possibly stirring up anti-semitism and weakening their power to exploit the tragedies commited by the Nazis for their own political agenda. However these same organizations are promoting Tarantino's fictional film.
Sack's message from his book was not to promote hatred against Jews. Instead, the books purpose was to prove that Jews are no different from any other group of people who have suffered from persecution but aren't immune from committing autrocities against others.
Behind an Eye for An Eye: Revenge, Hate and History by John Sack
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v20n1p-9_Sack.html
Comments
What I found most disturbing about the film wasn't so much what went on in the movie, though that was disturbing enough, it was what went on in the audience...
I can't help suspecting that one of the real motivations Tarantino had in mind when creating the movie was to see if he could induce the same kind of troglite behavior of the Nazis while watching their movie in the story...in the audience... for that is what I witnessed in my theater.
The Germans are too chicken and guilt ridden to make a film of that. Money rules the world, this is why the Chinese are the rulers of tomorrow not the Jews
Thank you, Robert. On a related topic, Israel currently operates the world's largest concentration camp in Gaza. The following analysis of Israel's atrocities and War Crimes is from Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, and held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. The title is "What became of Western morality?"
www dot informationclearinghouse.info/article21606
What was the holocaust about?
i wouldn't waste a plug penny to see that dog & phony show,the
khazars just won't let up on that holohoaxgram......beam me up to the "hollow-deck" DATA.
Thank you for this well-written article . When I 1st heard that Pitt/Tarantino made this film glorifying the horrific war crimes perpetrated by the American government and Zionists and Allies, I wrote a letter to Brad Pitt threatening to boycott him. My grandfather was a REAL war hero/fighter pilot in WW2. He was dead set against it. He even punched a bomber pilot out for releasing bombs on a German village. For one who knows the Truth about the allied war atrocities ( Katyn, Dresden, Russia, Jugoslavia, POW camps ), it is as if we have been sleep-walking for 65 tears. The great news is that we Americans are finally seeing and facing the facts of the brainwashing of us as children. These exaggerated allegations of Nazi war crimes was to cover-up our Government's own. Keep reading, keep sharing, keep spreading the Truth- it really does free us! Then organize; send Pitt/ Tarantino a note, call his agent;Boycott/Sanction/ Divest from Israeli goods. Boycott Starbucks(it is working!)
Just look at the plight of the Palestinians from 1948 to the present.
There has never been a better time to turn off the television and Hollywood. They have nothing positive to offer.
From online jewish articles:
Tarantino And The Limits Of Revenge
Several noteworthy books, like Rich Cohen’s “The Avengers” (Knopf, 2000) and Howard Blum’s “The Brigade,” (HarperCollins, 2001) have covered their story in full.
Jews tell of revenge death squads to kill Nazis
JERUSALEM: A group of elderly Holocaust survivors came forward with accounts of a death squad they had formed after World War II to take revenge on their Nazi persecutors, recounting a brazen operation in which they poisoned hundreds of SS officers.
Friday, March 27, 1998 | return to: international
Survivor reveals 1945 plan to kill 6 million Germans
by DOUGLAS DAVIS, Jewish Telegraphic Agency
I've done some looking- apparently there are some twisted words in the posts below RE: the Talmud...
"These misquotes and fabrications come straight from the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan web site. Some cannot be explained simply because the quotes do not exist in the Talmud. Some references are to a book that does not exist in Talmud or any Jewish literature. Others are taken seriously out of context, or add words or thoughts that are not in the original."
"Jews must always deceive non-Jews." - Zohar 1 160a-----
Zohar 1, 160a and Hilkoth Akum are not part of Talmud. There is no such reference as Zohar 1, 160a. (Zohar references don%u2019t have letters in them, like Talmud references do.) ... could find no passage in Zohar about deceiving Christians. In fact, the Zohar considered any deceit (no matter to whom it was directed) to be wrong.
(ref from liveleak link the board here won't let me post)
I plan to actually read some of the Torah and Talmud soon for myself..
Vengeance seems to be a central element of the Cannibal complex of Mind.
The central bankers who operate the war crimes cartel are still stuck on "animal primitivism' and continue to be unwilling to throw down the nuclear weapons and move into a world of Peace. Instead they are still at it. All these tens of thousand of nuclear weapons only awaiting an accident or mistake, and 'poof.'
If that happens then we will no longer be the Living dead, instead we will be the dead dead.
This overly well armed group does need some therapy to end their plans to hide underground and 'smoke us' with these nuclear weapons.
As a friend told me after learning the truth about nuclear weapons and the secret plans to sucker punch us with them; "They've chumped us out."
tares rising higher and higher
The Film was a persiflage on brutality. Didn't people notice that? More over the revenge group of Jews talking scalps were complete fiction.
Didn't you notice that the US/Jew soldiers have been pictured as brutal nut cases who weren't capable of speaking other languages?
On the other hand the SS men was pictured as intelligent, cosmopolitan and language capable human beings.
The film by the way was produced by a German company.
The truth about revenge? Eisenhower let over a million German soldiers, so called "enemy combatants" starve and freeze to death in the open. 11 million Germans died in the US occupied zone in Germany.
More to say?
Mr. Stark, it's obvious you have not read John Sack's book. Read it and it'll make your points of trying to tie the film with the book completely irrelevant. Isn't part of your job to do some research. Next time, please do so before you open your mouth and insert foot. Moron.
General Major a.D. Gerd Schultze-Rhondorf tells "History" to Aug 31 1939; You tell it off May 2 1945. NOW; will somebody tell me of Sept 1 1939 til May 1 1945 without blaring "I don't know nothing, I see no nothing, I hear no nothing, I do no nothing, on my way to Stalingrad and on my way back. I just follow orders." "Just leave me be in my 'comfortable pew' til the Lord calls me home!" These guys are just as stupid as their great-grandchildren will be; not "NO" nothing about 'Bergen-Belsen' and the 1st Canadian Paratroopers on their "Way to Wismar"! "O'p-P."
corr: "that rarely see the light of day"...
Inglourious Basterds is FICTION. Just like Sack's book. Please try actually reading it before you post more of your anti-semitism. Sack references many, many crimes committed by various concentration-camp survivors, then does his best to cover up the fact that many of these people were NOT JEWISH. Particularly in the case of the commander of Lamsdorf who was a Polish CATHOLIC. Sack himself admits that he "didn't know if any guards at Lamsdorf were Jews." As for Lola? She was a Jew, one of her guards was a Jew and her adjunct was a Jew - but Sack cannot prove that one, single, other person at the camp was Jewish. If you believe this crap about "Jew conspiracy" then you are a moron.
The reason Sack's dumb book was ignored was because it was FULL OF LIES.
The holocaust was a result of the worst potential of human behavior gone wild. We all have the ability to be Hitlers or Hitler-followers; there will always be people who perpetrate the most extreme human behavior, honorable or dishonorable, when they can.
Spirituality teaches that we can add strength to the light side of existence and repair the world. Yet, the depiction of atrocious behavior often appears more lucrative. Or, it importantly stirs up those same tendencies within and makes us contemplate them.
I am in the U.S. because my parents escaped WWII. The voracious human brutality that Tarantino depicts in this piece has many consequences, one of which is stirring up haters and non-haters alike. As a Jew, thanks for the ego-boost, Quentin: I will probably watch the film--cringing the whole time--and then happily return to my practice of meditation.
One feels sorry for the Jews who are troubled at the truth of WW II and have the courage to recognize that this kind of revenge fantasy only darkens the stain. As an admirer of the Weinstein brothers amazing artistic contributions I feel sorry at this lapse in integrity and good judgment.
It's shown again and again, the Jewish as well as the rest of the world are the DESCENDANTS of KAIN.
Another clear example of Jews using the media to mold, shape and manipulate public opinion. This is how they control the politicians in Washington and in every other country where the disease known as democrazy (mass mob voting and Jewish media control) has been foisted on the people
the lie that there was a Holocaust AGAINST jews; there certainly was a 40-million-victim Holocaust of innocent white Slavs in Russia and Ukraine, and it was committed BY jews during the Soviet Union’s bolshevik and stalinist periods from 1917-1957. Eight of the eleven gulag camps were run, Alexander Solzhenitysn wrote in his 2002 work Two Hundred Years Together, by murderous and psychopathic jews.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!