2001 GAO Congressional Report
In Part I, we listened to the arguments presented in American Public Media’s recent Marketplace report, Online competitors move in on shippers, and asked if deregulation of the trucking industry put consumers in control - or jeopardy - when shopping for moving services online.
The household goods moving industry, which was developed around the expansion of the intercontinental railroads in the U.S. during the nineteenth century, was deregulated by Congress in 1980. Within a very short period, an industry with several hundred carriers quickly grew to over 20,000+ nationwide. Overnight, consumers considering relocation were faced with many new price and service level options offered by a multitude of unknown service providers.
The only instrument used by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to provide consumers with uniform “quality control” performance information on all regulated household goods carriers, the Annual Carrier Performance Report, disappeared when Congress approved the ICC Termination Act in 1995.
About the same time that the carrier performance report met its demise, widespread consumer acceptance of the Internet began to flourish. By July 2001, it was estimated that 165.2 million users were logging in each month. This year it is estimated that 224 million Americans (80.6%) will use the Web everyday! Two billion users will click on worldwide by 2011.
Due to the expensive and unregulated nature of this industry, the high price tags associated with “moving” and “relocation” piqued the interest of many legitimate and not-so-legitimate internet entrepreneurs including many unscrupulous and unlicensed household goods carriers, independent movers, agents, move brokers and relocation company wannabees.
In a March, 2001 consumer protection report entitled Federal Actions Are Needed to Improve Oversight of the Household Goods Moving Industry, the General Accounting Office (GAO) advised Congressional committees that “the primary responsibility for consumer protection lies with consumers to select a reputable household goods carrier, ensure that they understand the terms and conditions of the contract, and understand and pursue the remedies that are available to them when problems arise.”
Although both the GAO and DOT recognized that “the majority of the consumer complaints (96%) concerned lost and damaged goods, untimely pickups or deliveries, inaccurate estimates and disputed rates,” and that the “most egregious complaints do not involve agents of major moving companies; most concern small companies that act as independent movers,” there was no enforcement effort to fix the problem. Consumers were essentially left to their own devices to reduce their risk and obtain satisfaction if – and when – they decide to relinquish their budget, all of their worldly possessions, and their trust to a relocation provider.
Since the household goods industry has no uniform reporting requirement nor centralized resources that rate the service performance of carriers, those interested in doing their due diligence before they invest in a mover frequently visit online “informational” resources like BBB.org and Epinions.com or the more controversial Ripoffreport.com and Movingscam.com to try to perform a responsible analysis. Most are shocked at what they find. You would be too!
These sites are like online report cards filled with flunking grades. Many contain subjective descriptions about the listed companies’ service failures, poor estimating practices, ineffective communications, hostage situations and the incompetence of personnel throughout the entire moving process. Yet hidden deep within these one-sided, personal accounts are nuggets of useful information in which most respondents define their own critical success factors. If considered collectively, they show golden opportunities for process improvement to legitimate service providers in the industry.
Last year the nation’s Better Business Bureaus (BBBs) reported that moving/storage companies ranked fourth in the most frequently checked out industry with their offices. Inquiries jumped from 563,126 in 2002 to 1,149,060 in 2008 – an increase of 204%. In 2001, the BBBs results ranked the moving industry sixth with just 274,388 inquiries.
Thanks to the pervasive power of the internet there’s been a 419% increase in the number of reliability reports issued by the BBBs during just a seven year period, and, collectively, the moving industry jumped even closer to the top of the list of most suspicious companies preying on the American consumer.
In Part III we’ll look at the primary reasons those considering relocation should be wary when shopping for transportation services online.
For more info: Still at your wit’s end? Join me at RELORoundTable – a gathering place where interested visitors can participate in a mutually supportive but commercially neutral learning environment that deals with the trials and tribulations of movin’.
Comments
Dont believe what the BBB has to say about any company. Read below and see what they ARE all about.
NOTICE OF CLAIM FROM US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY DIVISION
Violations of 49 CFR 375.207 (a) PROVIDING FALSE, MISLEADING, OR DECEPTIVE INFORMATION IN ADVERTISING
AND
375.405 (d) NINE (9) VIOLATIONS OF FAILING TO RETAIN COPIES OF THE NON-BINDING ESTIMATE FOR EACH MOVE PREFORMED FOR ONE YEAR AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BILL OF LADING.
Civil Penalty: $12,900
Case Number: CA-2008-0742-US1164
US DOT Number: 671253
Better Business Bureau Temecula (filed complaint)
Was told they have 21 complaints against them
If you have any questions regarding your complaint, please contact the Complaint Dept. At (909) 825-7280 or email info@labbb.org.
(I just recently contacted the Better Business Bureau and let them know about the civil penalties regarding the moving company and they e-mailed me the following)
The
(I just recently contacted the Better Business Bureau and let them know about the civil penalties regarding the moving company and they e-mailed me the following)
They literally ignored the complaint!
Denise,
Thank you for sending this information. We will attach it to your complaint. At this time this is not considered something we report to the public.
Thank you
Nichol DelNero | Trade Practices Analyst
Denise, The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration also doesn't include any information about civil or criminal enforcement actions at their carrier complaint search tool at www[dot]protectyourmove[dot}gov, or in their Carrier Overview History in SafeStat Online. You might be interested in reading the article "How to Find a Reputable Mover: Check with the Better Business Bureau".
UShip's transparency and claim of: "In the last 2 years, over $70,000,000 has transacted through our platform and we've only had 4 claims against our Guarantee", can best be read all about (1st hand) by following the steps below:
Google the phrase:
Uship feedback negative rating
Scroll down to where it says: “Show more results from www.UShip.Com” and click on that.
Scroll down to where it says: “Show all results from www.UShip.Com“ and click on that.
Once all of the results appear, click on them until you've read all you care to read!
Warning! Be prepared for an eye opening and in many cases a heart wrenching experience.
Tracey, your comments digress from the purpose of this post. Many of the criticisms posted online about this virtual marketer do not deal directly with complaints about shipping household goods which was the subject of APM’s Marketplace report – the basis used for this series of articles.
While some u-Ship detractors have other issues regarding how the company collects and displays their ‘rating and review’ information, the focus on in this series has been on u-Ship’s reluctance to aid users of their reverse auction services by enforcing Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulations.
The consumer protection regulations included under 49CFR, Part 375.207 require every interstate household goods motor carrier or move broker to include their name or trade name, and the U.S. DOT number assigned by FMCSA authorizing them to operate as a for-hire motor carrier in all advertisements for all services (including any accessional services).
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!