The Top 10 Best Comic Book Superhero Movies

The sequel to one of the greatest of all superhero movies is actually hard to distinguish from the first. This is in part due to the fact that they were filmed at the same time. Tonally and visually, everything feels as though it’s right where the first one left off. Christopher Reeve is still the greatest actor to ever don the red and blue tights, and we get to see some really interesting scenes with Superman trying to prevent Lois Lane from discovering his secret, nearly letting her die in the process.What’s great though is that in this movie, we learn a few things about the Superman character. The first is that he’s willing to give up all of his powers to be with the woman he loves. It’s a big middle finger to the rest of the world, but to him it’s worth it. I imagine the reason he has to do this is because he’d kill her if they had sex. I mean that seriously. Once he turns mortal, it’s the first thing they do, making this among the few superhero movies to have that included.Another thing we learn about Superman is that he’s not above petty revenge. While depowered, he and Lois go to a diner and he gets his ass handed to him by some trucker bully. Coincidentally, General Zod (as played with such grace by Terence Stamp) and his cohorts have conquered the earth at this point, so he has no choice but to regain his powers (though if you ask me, after experiencing pain for the first time, he was probably glad to have an excuse). At the end of the movie, after you’ve probably forgotten about that scene, repowered Clark Kent returns to the diner and beats the living hell out of the man who made him bleed his own blood. Remember, Superman stands for “truth, justice, and the American way”, and the American way definitely includes getting even with people.Aside from the great character moments, brilliantly acted by Christopher Reeve, “Superman II” also includes some genuine super villains, each with the ridiculous (and ever-growing) powers that Superman has. These guys are so successful at being bad that they actually take over the planet for a few days while Superman and Lois get it on. Of course Lex Luthor is still conniving and plotting to seize power, and Gene Hackman is as witty and charming as he was in the first, although this time we’re allowed to take him a bit more seriously with the absence of his goofy idiot sidekick, Otis (played by Ned Beatty whose talents were wasted in the role).While it expands on certain plot threads established in the first film, it places heavy emphasis on the growing relationship between Lois and Superman, which is a big part of what make this story so great. There’s action, world conquering villains, tragic romance, and plenty of genuine moments allowing for the characters to grow. Here you have everything you could want in not only a Superman movie, but a superhero movie in general.The sequel to the fun adaptation of the lesser known Dark Horse comic character was Guillermo Del Toro taking it to bigger and more ambitious heights. The first film, while undoubtedly quirky and entertaining, cannot match the sheer spectacle and visual eye candy that its sequel brings. Aside from the terrific costumed performances of Ron Perlman and Doug Jones (Hellboy and Abe Sapien, respectively), we get an onslaught of bizarre new monsters in a literal marketplace to explore. The “Troll Market” is located under the Brooklyn Bridge and has to be one of the most memorable fantasy locations, rivaling the Cantina from the first “Star Wars”. Everywhere you look is a new and creatively designed monster selling or buying goods. The amount of work it must have taken to craft something that’s probably onscreen for a mere few seconds is mind boggling. There’s so much to see in this one extended sequence that multiple viewings are required to fully take it all in.While the first film was loosely adapted from an arc in the comics, the sequel, written by both Del Toro and Mike Mignola (Hellboy’s creator), takes its own path into the realm of pure fantasy. There’s Elven Royalty, trolls, goblins, and even an angel of death (and half of these creatures were performed by Doug Jones). While the Hellboy movies (and franchise in general) aren’t quite as popular as the more mainstream counterparts of Marvel and DC, they stand apart for pure originality and imagination. With so many superhero movies today, it’s the ones that truly stand out that become memorable.Christopher Nolan’s first take on the character was a much needed revival for Batman. The previous two movies, being “Batman Forever” and “Batman & Robin”, had all but ruined the caped crusader for the big screen. During the eight years before “Batman Begins”, there was such desperation for rebooting the character that there was very nearly a “Batman Beyond” movie, based on the acclaimed cartoon that was currently airing. In the end it was decided that a more traditional approach was needed and the famed Frank Miller graphic novel “Batman: Year One” was looked to for inspiration.Unlike the previous adaptations of the Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan’s movie was much more focused on the Bruce Wayne character, as opposed to his iconic villains. Of course that’s not to say that the villains of “Batman Begins” aren’t interesting. Between Cillian Murphy’s scene stealing Scarecrow and the city-wide madness Ra's al Ghul wanted to create, there’s a lot to like here. Aside from the general theme of fear (which is prevalent throughout the film), there’s a heavy emphasis on explaining the psychology of a man who would wage a one-man war on crime, dressed as a large bat. We get to see him acquire his gadgets, build his suit, train in secret martial arts in the mountains of an unnamed Asian country, and even give a more practical and thought out explanation for his obsession with bats.The universe created for this version of the superhero is equally thought out to match the details of the character’s motives. Gotham City is a realistic and modern metropolis resembling any major American city (especially Chicago). It’s a far cry from the retro noir look of the Tim Burton films. The realism and practicality is applied to all elements of the Batman world, including the Batmobile and the Batcave. Another welcome addition is the importance of Batman’s ally, Commissioner Gordon (or rather, Lieutenant Gordon in this one), a character that's all but forgotten in the previous adaptations.The serious and realistic approach Christopher Nolan took with the character is responsible for breathing fresh life into the franchise cinematically and, most importantly, led to the sequel.View the list »
Marvel Heroes

Movies newsletter

The Superhero has a long history in the cinematic medium. As far back as the golden age of cinema, there has seldom been a time without some type of masked adventurer to appeal to the minds of viewers. In the 1940s, this was mostly in the form of the chapter based serial.

Related topics

Advertisement

A precursor to later television shows, these would follow the cliffhanger adventures of daring heroes and adventurers as they battled the forces of evil week after week. Many pulp heroes thrived in this medium including The Shadow, The Lone Ranger, Zorro, The Spider and The Green Hornet, to name but a few. Even some comic book characters found themselves adapted to the screen, including Batman, The Phantom, and Captain America. Still, with the exception of Zorro and The Shadow, few of these mystery men could boast having a feature length film.

It wasn’t until the 1970s and the first Superman film that modern audiences were graced with a Hollywood budget feature-length spectacle of the comic book superhero, and what better character to begin with. Since that time, there has not been a decade without its superhero adaptations, and even more so since the new millennium. The action movie genre is now so flooded with comic book adaptations they've become a genre unto themselves, complete with specific tropes and clichés. Just as with the comics, there have been great films, and some really bad ones.

It’s time to look at a few of the best. The ten best.

View the list
  • Christopher Nolan’s first take on the character was a much needed revival for Batman. The previous two movies, being “Batman Forever” and “Batman & Robin”, had all but ruined the caped crusader for the big screen. During the eight years before “Batman Begins”, there was such desperation for rebooting the character that there was very nearly a “Batman Beyond” movie, based on the acclaimed cartoon that was currently airing. In the end it was decided that a more traditional approach was needed and the famed Frank Miller graphic novel “Batman: Year One” was looked to for inspiration.Unlike the previous adaptations of the Dark Knight, Christopher Nolan’s movie was much more focused on the Bruce Wayne character, as opposed to his iconic villains. Of course that’s not to say that the villains of “Batman Begins” aren’t interesting. Between Cillian Murphy’s scene stealing Scarecrow and the city-wide madness Ra's al Ghul wanted to create, there’s a lot to like here. Aside from the general theme of fear (which is prevalent throughout the film), there’s a heavy emphasis on explaining the psychology of a man who would wage a one-man war on crime, dressed as a large bat. We get to see him acquire his gadgets, build his suit, train in secret martial arts in the mountains of an unnamed Asian country, and even give a more practical and thought out explanation for his obsession with bats.The universe created for this version of the superhero is equally thought out to match the details of the character’s motives. Gotham City is a realistic and modern metropolis resembling any major American city (especially Chicago). It’s a far cry from the retro noir look of the Tim Burton films. The realism and practicality is applied to all elements of the Batman world, including the Batmobile and the Batcave. Another welcome addition is the importance of Batman’s ally, Commissioner Gordon (or rather, Lieutenant Gordon in this one), a character that's all but forgotten in the previous adaptations.The serious and realistic approach Christopher Nolan took with the character is responsible for breathing fresh life into the franchise cinematically and, most importantly, led to the sequel.
  • The sequel to the fun adaptation of the lesser known Dark Horse comic character was Guillermo Del Toro taking it to bigger and more ambitious heights. The first film, while undoubtedly quirky and entertaining, cannot match the sheer spectacle and visual eye candy that its sequel brings. Aside from the terrific costumed performances of Ron Perlman and Doug Jones (Hellboy and Abe Sapien, respectively), we get an onslaught of bizarre new monsters in a literal marketplace to explore. The “Troll Market” is located under the Brooklyn Bridge and has to be one of the most memorable fantasy locations, rivaling the Cantina from the first “Star Wars”. Everywhere you look is a new and creatively designed monster selling or buying goods. The amount of work it must have taken to craft something that’s probably onscreen for a mere few seconds is mind boggling. There’s so much to see in this one extended sequence that multiple viewings are required to fully take it all in.While the first film was loosely adapted from an arc in the comics, the sequel, written by both Del Toro and Mike Mignola (Hellboy’s creator), takes its own path into the realm of pure fantasy. There’s Elven Royalty, trolls, goblins, and even an angel of death (and half of these creatures were performed by Doug Jones). While the Hellboy movies (and franchise in general) aren’t quite as popular as the more mainstream counterparts of Marvel and DC, they stand apart for pure originality and imagination. With so many superhero movies today, it’s the ones that truly stand out that become memorable.
  • The sequel to one of the greatest of all superhero movies is actually hard to distinguish from the first. This is in part due to the fact that they were filmed at the same time. Tonally and visually, everything feels as though it’s right where the first one left off. Christopher Reeve is still the greatest actor to ever don the red and blue tights, and we get to see some really interesting scenes with Superman trying to prevent Lois Lane from discovering his secret, nearly letting her die in the process.What’s great though is that in this movie, we learn a few things about the Superman character. The first is that he’s willing to give up all of his powers to be with the woman he loves. It’s a big middle finger to the rest of the world, but to him it’s worth it. I imagine the reason he has to do this is because he’d kill her if they had sex. I mean that seriously. Once he turns mortal, it’s the first thing they do, making this among the few superhero movies to have that included.Another thing we learn about Superman is that he’s not above petty revenge. While depowered, he and Lois go to a diner and he gets his ass handed to him by some trucker bully. Coincidentally, General Zod (as played with such grace by Terence Stamp) and his cohorts have conquered the earth at this point, so he has no choice but to regain his powers (though if you ask me, after experiencing pain for the first time, he was probably glad to have an excuse). At the end of the movie, after you’ve probably forgotten about that scene, repowered Clark Kent returns to the diner and beats the living hell out of the man who made him bleed his own blood. Remember, Superman stands for “truth, justice, and the American way”, and the American way definitely includes getting even with people.Aside from the great character moments, brilliantly acted by Christopher Reeve, “Superman II” also includes some genuine super villains, each with the ridiculous (and ever-growing) powers that Superman has. These guys are so successful at being bad that they actually take over the planet for a few days while Superman and Lois get it on. Of course Lex Luthor is still conniving and plotting to seize power, and Gene Hackman is as witty and charming as he was in the first, although this time we’re allowed to take him a bit more seriously with the absence of his goofy idiot sidekick, Otis (played by Ned Beatty whose talents were wasted in the role).While it expands on certain plot threads established in the first film, it places heavy emphasis on the growing relationship between Lois and Superman, which is a big part of what make this story so great. There’s action, world conquering villains, tragic romance, and plenty of genuine moments allowing for the characters to grow. Here you have everything you could want in not only a Superman movie, but a superhero movie in general.
  • This is a movie that could have been at least as big of a disaster as it was a hit. It was the product of multiple franchise tie-ins spanning about five years worth of superhero blockbusters. With so many different characters from different franchises being thrust together to foil an alien invasion, the risks were certainly there. Aside from what easily could have been a jumbled plot, there’s also the fear of popularity to take into account. With the “Iron Man” movies and Robert Downey Jr. being among the most popular characters, it could have easily been the unofficial third entry in his series with Iron Man filling most of the screen time, much as Wolverine did in the “X-Men” Trilogy. Luckily, against all odds, “The Avengers” turned out to be one of the most entertaining and enjoyable movie experiences of the year.While you can give credit to the amazing special effects and the inclusion of all the previous actors (except for the Hulk), the real credit belongs to one man: director Joss Whedon. He was able to carefully balance each of the characters over the course of the 2 ½ hour run time and keep things light, fun, and interesting. There’s never a dull moment to be found and it gives you everything you could hope to see from a superhero team-up movie of this scale. It stands about as far apart as it can from the Nolan Batman films without reaching camp territory. There’s a surprising amount of humor, but it doesn’t feel out of place with the characters or the world established in their respective films.It’s a movie with a bunch of characters in ridiculous costumes and they chose not to take too seriously. Joss Whedon was right to pack it full of his clever and witty dialogue, making some of the scenes, which are simply superheroes arguing, at least as compelling as the over-the-top action. Of all the (many) superhero movies to be released in the past decade, few can match the sheer entertainment value of the Earth’s Mightiest Heroes.
  • It’s the classic superhero movie against which many are compared. It’s also the first true superhero film, fully bringing the comic book character to life in a way that had never been imagined before. Prior to 1978, the man of steel had been animated, portrayed in a serial, heard on the radio, and, most famously, portrayed by actor George Reeves.But it wasn’t until Christopher Reeve donned the red and blue tights that the world could believe that a man could fly. His version of the character, of both Superman and his mild mannered alter ego, Clark Kent, is considered by most to be the definitive version. So much so that in the 2006 sequel, “Superman Returns”, actor Brandon Routh was cast due to his resemblance to the actor. From his confident and naturalistic Superman to his bumbling, but likeable Clark Kent, Christopher Reeve could not only make Superman seem like a real person, but he was also able to make the glasses more than enough to disguise him. His battle against evil and the charming, yet devious Lex Luthor (played with a certain relish by Gene Hackman), is the stuff of modern legend.Everything about the Superman mythos is brought to life in a way that seems impossible to duplicate or surpass. The opening with the child reading from a Superman comic, the magnificence and destruction of Superman’s home planet of Krypton, and the opening credits accompanied by John Williams' universally recognized theme. Though it gets mind boggling with Superman and his ability to turn back time, this first movie is considered among the gold standards of the genre, defining what it means to be a superhero for a generation.
  • For the longest time, the most recognizable face of Batman was that of Adam West, star of the ‘60s television series, “Batman”. The show lasted for three seasons and portrayed the caped crusader in a campy, comedic style; a far cry from the dark knight’s pulp/noir beginnings. Though undeniably silly, it was actually in line with the Batman comics of the time. This all changed in the ‘80s, following a release of comics like Frank Miller’s “The Dark Knight Returns”. Suddenly, Batman was brought back to his roots, dealing punishment to the bad guys in a way that would make his ‘60s counterpart cringe. But this was only in the comics, and not everyone reads comics.For many, the rediscovery of Batman came in 1989, with Tim Burton’s take on the character. With his unconventional, yet brilliant casting of Michael Keaton as Batman and Jack Nicholson as his iconic nemesis, the Joker, Tim Burton changed the way everyone related to the classic superhero. Gotham city was now a gritty, noir paradise; a timeless mix of modern technology and ‘30s fashion and architecture. To this day, there are few comparisons in film that can resemble the world he created for the hero and, much like the John Williams' soundtrack for “Superman”, Danny Elfman’s classic score is undeniably the most associated theme for the character, even being used in the animated series that followed.The characters themselves are no less memorable. Michael Keaton, who was previously known for his more comedic characters like “Beetlejuice”, fit perfectly in the dual role of the tortured Bruce Wayne and his violent alter ego. But what most remember is the villain. Jack Nicholson’s Joker is a scene stealing, maniacal laughing, and Prince music loving psychopath. He captured the menacing threat of his psychotic mind and the juvenile fun of his character.Of course “Batman” has its problems. The romance between Bruce Wayne and Vicki Vale feels forced, even in the movie, which only leads to Alfred’s bizarre decision to let her in on Bruce Wayne’s secret. They also make the Joker the killer of Bruce Wayne’s parents, which I think was a critical mistake for the character’s origin. His parent’s killer should have been crime itself; anonymous. By making it anything else, Batman is given a chance for personal revenge, which is not really what the character is about.These flaws can be overlooked thanks to the power of certain scenes such as when Batman takes Vicky Vale to the Batcave. It’s a terrific scene, pulling off the gothic atmosphere Tim Burton is known for. There’s no dialogue from the dark hero, just an intense stare as he takes her to a place unknown. The batmobile roars through a bleak forest road, seemingly in another world entirely from the city we’ve seen up until this point. This scene, more than any other in the movie, is what defines a modern and dark Batman for live action. Like the 1978 “Superman”, “Batman” redefined the character in a way that seemed impossible to top…at least until 2008.
  • Yet another Batman film on the list, this one is mostly forgotten.  It’s a sad case, considering it’s one of the greatest superhero movies of all time. From the minds of Bruce Timm, Paul Dini, and Alan Burnett (just a few responsible for “Batman: the Animated Series”), “Mask of the Phantasm” was both an extended look at the origin of the superhero and a glimpse of a time when Bruce Wayne almost didn’t don the cape and cowl. The story follows an unknown vigilante killing mob bosses, framing Batman in the process. While Batman investigates, he’s forced to elude the police, reconcile his feelings for an old love, and deal with the Joker.The voice acting is top notch, featuring the voices from the show, most notably Kevin Conroy as Batman and Mark Hamill as the Joker. The story is tightly woven and surprisingly dramatic. The romance and the characters are well developed and it offers an interesting look at the life of a young Bruce Wayne before he became Batman. Up until “Batman Begins”, this was the most extensive examination of his troubled psyche and, in my opinion, this movie does it better. The conflict he feels when he considers the possibility that he doesn’t need to be Batman; that he could potentially find happiness is both tragic and fascinating. Learning about his development is almost as entertaining as seeing the Batman in action.Speaking of action, it’s great in this. The animation is as solid and crisp as it looked on the show, featuring the highly stylized artwork of the city, inspired by the retro look of the Tim Burton films but made into its own. Only here can you get a visual like Batman and the Joker battling as giants over a model of Gotham City. Much like the show it spun off from, it’s a fresh and breathtaking reminder that animation isn’t just for kids. Its dark, it’s complex, and as dramatic as any of the live action counterparts (surpassing all but one). In the medium of cel animation, this version of Batman is capable of doing far more than ever possible in live action. If you haven’t seen it, see it.
  • The second of the Sam Raimi “Spider-Man” movies is by far the greatest, finding the best balance between the superhero action, character drama, and comic book camp that the franchise has been known for. This time around, Spider-Man must face Doctor Octopus, a villain brought to life in a classic camp horror fashion as only the director of the “Evil Dead” movies could manage. His “rebirth” scene is one of the most memorable in the film.The rest of the plot builds successfully on the elements of the first, improving them in many ways. Harry is descending into obsession after witnessing the death of his father, the Green Goblin, Mary Jane is moving on while Peter Parker struggles with his own feelings of guilt and responsibility. His psychological battle weighs him down so heavily that it suppresses his powers, giving him the chance at a normal life, which is what he thinks he wants.While the tone of the movie never takes itself too seriously, the personal conflicts the characters go through feel much more real this time, and it manages to find that balance that the first and especially the third film don’t. Every element of the first film has been expanded upon and improved, from the superiority of the special effects to the handling of the plot. There are plenty of silly moments, such as the way the citizens of New York seem to react to things, be it cheering on Spider-Man or shrieking at the villain while he stomps around the city, but it’s also coupled with strong, genuinely serious moments such as Peter admitting his involvement in his uncle’s death to his Aunt May.Though the action is spectacular, it’s the attention paid to the strong character development that makes “Spider-Man 2” as great as it is. Peter Parker is as sympathetic and relatable as he can possibly be, despite his super powers. He lives in a tiny New York apartment and can barely pay his rent. He struggles to live with the burden of using his abilities to aid mankind. You’ll never see Bruce Wayne, Tony Stark, or even Clark Kent struggle to pay their rent on time. Spider-man is a true working class hero, and it’s done so effectively here. It’s light where it needs to be and dramatic in all the right places. It’s the greatest “Spider-man” film to date, and among the best in the superhero genre.
  • Much like “The Avengers”, “Iron Man” had a lot riding on it. It was the first (of many) Marvel owned movie licenses, allowing them complete creative control over their own property. The Marvel logo changed to become Marvel Studios, and “Iron Man” was their first title. It was a character that had been on the back burner for years, with various names attached to the project like Nick Cassavettes to direct and Tom Cruise to star (that would have been a very different movie). Eventually, it fell into the oddly chosen hands of Jon Favreau, who had only one man in mind for the title character. He envisioned Tony Stark, the billionaire, playboy, and weapons manufacturer, to be played by none other than Robert Downey Jr., who was nobody’s first choice. Turns out, Jon Favreau has a talent for casting. Much like Christopher Reeve is forever associated with Superman, so now has Iron Man become defined by his onscreen portrayal by Robert Downey Jr.The movie is defined by its strong cast more than it is the action. Gwyneth Paltrow plays his assistant Pepper Potts, Terrence Howard plays his friend Rhodey, and they even got Jeff Bridges to play the villainous Obadiah Stane. “Iron Man” as a superhero film plays out very differently from all others, putting most of the emphasis on the man behind the mask (or helmet in this case). Tony Stark is the focus of almost every scene, dominating the banter and even obliterating the distinguishing personality of the superhero alter ego.In almost every other case, the superhero has a secret identity. Superman is mild mannered Clark Kent, Batman is an aloof playboy millionaire by day, and even Peter Parker changes his personality as Spider-man, becoming more confident and taunting his villains with jokes and insults. None of this applies to Iron Man, who is always Tony Stark in and out of costume.Because of the technological nature of his suit, they included a heads up display of his face within the armor, allowing Robert Downey Jr.’s face to fill the screen, even when fully armored. It’s a constant reminder that his dominant personality is the only one necessary. Tony Stark and Iron Man are one and the same. It’s a new and different approach to a superhero, only made all the more fascinating by Robert Downey Jr.’s performance. Though much of the focus is on the complexity of the hero, that’s not to say it slouches in the action department. The armored suit was created mostly using practical effects, and seeing the sleek red and gold design in action is a thing of beauty. It can do everything you would hope: fire anti-tank missiles, shoot repulsor rays, and fly from California to Afghanistan in no time at all.Much like all of the Marvel owned movies, humor plays a significant role in the tone of the film, which was established by the quick wit of the hero of this movie. It set a gold standard for all of the Marvel movies to follow, and so far, none have yet reached the lofty heights of this one. As far as pure superhero fun and action go, “Iron Man” is about as good as it gets.
  • Given that he already has three other movies on the list, I suppose it can’t be helped that he would get one more. As it turns out, Batman is just a character that, when done right, can be done so right.“The Dark Knight” is the sequel to Christopher Nolan’s “Batman Begins”, and much as “Spider-man” and “Hellboy” were greatly improved by their sequels, this franchise is no exception. Only this time, the sequel was so great that it nearly surpasses the label of being a great superhero movie. “The Dark Knight”, in its realistic and modern world setting, could almost fall into the category of great crime drama.Batman is confronted by an enemy who only wants to challenge him and force him to break his one rule, being his refusal to kill. The stakes are placed so high that their battle becomes a captivating game to see how the hero can overcome such incredible odds. Every element of the movie hits its mark, from Harvey Dent’s inevitable descent into Two-Face, Batman and Gordon’s war on crime, and of course, the late Heath Ledger’s handling of the Joker. After Jack Nicholson’s portrayal of the character in the ’89 "Batman", few thought it could ever be topped. Fewer still thought a young actor like Heath Ledger would be the one to do it, but after the first footage was released, it became all to obvious that he’d found a way to take a character, one that had been around for 70 years, and make him as frightening and original as though he were created yesterday.This version of the Joker stands firmly among the greatest villains in cinema history. Heath Ledger becomes so engrossed in the character that you can study a still from the movie and not recognize the actor beneath the make-up. He reinvented the Joker and the entire movie benefitted from it. The scene in which Batman interrogates the Joker is one of the greatest scenes in the movie, and in any superhero movie for that matter. Never before have the two characters been utilized so effectively and the idea of the arch-nemesis is played with so that it feels natural, despite the realistic Gotham the characters inhabit. The action is bigger and better than it was in the previous film, this time utilizing IMAX cameras with incredible results.“The Dark Knight” has it all and takes it to a level never before thought possible with a comic book adaptation. It stands at the opposite end of the spectrum from nearly every superhero movie before, showing that even though your hero dresses up like a bat to battle a mad clown, there’s no reason that it can’t be worthy of great drama.
View the list
Suggested by the author:

, Seattle Film Examiner

Ian Drury, an online film critic for banonsroar.com, is a young and educated writer who recently graduated from the University of Washington in Seattle. Ian earned his degree in Cinema Studies and has over two years of experience writing reviews. Contact Ian at Ian_the_master_004@hotmail.com

Advertisement

Today's top buzz...