
Many young people supported presidential candidate Ron Paul in
2008. (AP photo/David J. Phillip)
Is libertarianism growing around the world in spite of the political dominance of its antithesis, big government socialistic type regimes everywhere?
A blog in the UK publication New Statesman titled "Twitter and libertarianism" proclaimed on Wednesday, "Libertarianism is the ideology of the future judging by the new Prospect/YouGov poll on the "twitterati".
The survey, the article claimed, "found that Twitter users are more concerned with civil liberties than the public at large."
But the article mentions only one other example from the poll; that while 57 percent of the public believe that increasing anti-terrorist police powers is more important than protecting civil liberties only half of British Twitters agree.
Prospect, the monthly UK magazine behind the poll, admits in its recently released, November edition that the "national poll of 2000+ people" conducted with pollster YouGov is "part of a fun feature about the politics of Twitter."
Typical for British politics, libertarianism is referred to in "liberal and civil libertarian" terms. For example, the magazine created a scale from their findings that placed Twitter users on the "More Liberal" end, far removed from the conservative "More Authoritarian" end of the scale.
Prospect quotes its own managing editor as saying, "It is clear that the urban, metropolitan, Guardian-reading ‘chattering classes’ have flocked online to become the ‘twittering classes’ —and they are now a real force in British politics.”
Just a few weeks ago back in the USA David Boaz was writing about a recent Gallup poll in the Cato@Liberty blog: "Gallup often asks people how they describe themselves. But sometimes they classify people according to the values they express. And when they do that, they find a healthy percentage of libertarians."
What Gallup found was that 23 percent of the voting-age population identifies itself as "libertarian."
But "libertarian" is more than just politics. It's a social, philosophical, intellectual, economic, and ideological movement that may or may not translate into votes, especially into Libertarian Party votes.
Beyond the polls is anecdotal evidence of libertarianism's increasing popularity and acceptance in the United States.
Boaz, again writing in cato@liberty, noted that on the same Monday night in the relatively small Washington DC area Reason.tv held an event that launched its new “Radicals for Capitalism” series of videos celebrating Ayn Rand’s continuing influence, the Future of Freedom Foundation and the George Mason University Economics Society sponsored a lecture by Lawrence W. Reed, president of the Foundation for Economic Education, and "an overflow crowd" attended the screening of a new film, "The Soviet Story," at the Cato Institute.
As Boaz put it, "It’s got to be a sign of growth and health if the libertarian movement is offering three excellent programs on one Monday night in one area."
Stories like these over the past year prompted the Dallas Libertarian Examiner to ask, "Gen Y - the Libertarian Generation?"
CampusProgress.org noted earlier this month that while young people voted overwhelmingly for Obama, "the other candidate who captured the hearts and minds of youth voters was Ron Paul," the erstwhile conservative-libertarian-Republican candidate for president in 2008.
They also report that Students for Liberty, a network of “pro-liberty student groups” comprising College Libertarians, Austrian economists, and Objectivists is the fastest growing libertarian student organization in America.
Is libertarianism the ideology of the future? Statistically and anecdotally, so far so good.
Libertarian contributors wanted! Have article ideas? Photos? News tips? News releases?
Join the team here!











Comments
You ask: "Is libertarianism growing around the world in spite of the political dominance of its antithesis, big government socialistic type regimes everywhere?"
Probably precisely BECAUSE of those regimes rather than "in spite of" them. Just my guess.
Libertarianism can only grow if "libertarians" realize that "you cannot have freedom unless you are willing to give it to others" (Dick Boddie). Too many of the "libertarians" want to prohibit immigration and abortions. People must have the freedom to migrate, speak whatever language they choose, and be able to seek job and business opportunities wherever they exist. A woman's right to choose must be preserved. Too many "libertarians" do not understand that there should be no class of people who are "illegal immigrants." It is the immigration law that is at fault, not the immigrants. All people must be equal before the law, or there is no freedom, there is only the tyranny of imposed class structure.
I think libertarianism and classical liberalism is the only shot for the republican party. Some conservatives are very close while others are not. If people feel its bad enough they will go third party but i think its easier to take over one of the 2 main parties. Rand Paul and Peter Schiff are running for senate in the republican party. That is the future in my opinion.
You are very right Geno Canto. Almost all the american Libertarians I know show clear antiinmigrant feelings and opinions. I suppose it is so difficult for them to understand migration as part of freedom or maybe because many immigrants are dark skinned the said "libertarians" think they, the immigrants, do not deserve to work and live in America.
Edgar- You should read my columns then. Starting with this one: tinyurl.com/yfcgmcu
American liberty for americans. If you want a libertarian life, THEN FIX THE COUNTRY OF YOUR OWN CITIZENSHIP. If you came here legally then join in.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!