.png)
Corrected Fox News Logo
I've been watching a lot of the townhall debates lately on C-Span regarding the current attempt in Congress to overhaul the health insurance industry in this country. One of the better ones I watched recently was Representative Jim Moran's (D-VI) trying to communicate to his constituents what is in the bill, what isn't and why. If you'd like to watch the entire thing, you can do so here.
I'd recommend watching that first, although it is nearly two hours long. He does a very good job at the beginning of outlining a number of the myths flying around and then opens the door to questions. Which is where Fox comes in.
During the question and answer period, a man was asked by Rep. Moran for his ID. This is how Fox News portrayed that event.
Fox uses this edited clip to portray what Rep. Moran did as being unhelpful. What Fox neglects to mention, and completely misses, was the context of the question and what had happened previously during the town hall.
The way the question and answer portion of the town hall was conducted was very simple. Questions were submitted on note card, put into a box and then picked from the box and addressed by the Congressman. A very simple way to attempt to be fair and balanced in addressing voter concerns. The problem was that the simple method was abused.
Previous to the incident Fox showed, a name was called and as staffers attempted to find the woman whose name was on the selected card, another woman acted like she was the one called, grabbed the mic and started ranting about an unrelated issue.
In order to try and keep some semblance of order to the question and answer period of the townhall, Moran simply asked the man to confirm that he was the person named on the card pulled from the box. That's it. Pretty simple and straightforward. The man then asked his question (paraphrased: "Why No Tort Reform?") which was then answered by Howard Dean (paraphrased: "We're already taking on enough of the establishment here, adding more enemies wouldn't help.")
In this case, Fox made a completely unrelated point about the incident and used it to continue their ongoing storyline about how Democrats are unhelpful and hate America.
This can be contrast with a more rational take on the Virginia town hall, covered here.
[Howard] Dean spoke, and questions were taken from the floor. Many were combatative, with several questioners demanding to know what kind of health insurance Moran had and how much he paid. Moran answered. But he got more than a little heated when a woman lied about her identity and succeeded in getting the microphone through her ruse.
But somehow in all of that, in large part thanks to Moran's grit, information was imparted and myriad voices were heard. As ragged and nasty as things got from time to time, it felt like democracy -- in a good way.
And C-SPAN showed it all. I know I got up from the TV set better informed on the health care debate than I was when I sat down.
All of which brings us to the grand distorter currently gumming up the air waves via Fox, one Glenn Beck. I've watched Beck a bit over the years, and quickly became rather dismayed at his style of disinformation dissemination.
To get a sense of how this kook works, Jed Lewiston put together this video compiled over the last *week* (just one week) of the crazy that currently being broadcast.
Pulling apart Beck's delusional fears and massive inability to deal with reality are well beyond the scope of a single post. When one has gone this far over the edge, no amount of interjection of reality seems to be effective.
I will try one thing though. Beck has been ranting about Obama's secret army for a while now, complete with Nazi references (all the while ignoring the fact that Obama, as Commander-in-Chief already has a real army at his beck and call).
The problem here is that this little nugget of delusional victimhood was debunked nearly a year ago by Fact Check.org.
What is the truth behind Obama's statements that he wants to create a "civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the military]"?
The problem here is a psychological one. Once someone has committed themselves to the conspiracies and the delusions, any new information regarding their inaccuracy is quickly discarded. This is why folks who fall under this spell not only continue to believe in their alternate reality, but also loudly state that no one has ever proved it wrong (as such proof is ignored and/or quickly forgotten) thus confirming the lie.
It's almost like these folks have a severe physical mental handicap. A complete a total lack of ability to learn anything beyond the most rudimentary emotional reasoning.
And as Robert Downey, Jr. so eloquently pointed out in "Tropic Thunder", one should never go full retard on purpose.
If they do, perhaps it's a good time to change the channel, and starve the beast a bit.
I hear C-Span does good work.
[note: title reference warning: strong language]
Comments
had me laughing for like five minutes.
Enjoyed the article. Keep up the good work.
And those with closed minds never see what's right in front of their face! This country is on the verge of a revolution, if America doesn't wake up and smell the coffee this country will be just another Great Britian or France. This is the greatest country on Earth and those of us who value the Constitution will fight to our dying breath for the rights it gives us. The Government does not own me, can not stifle my voice or my right to peacefully protest. I am neither Republican or Democrat, I am an American. The political parties want us divided, they know a united country will not be to their advantage. We are uniting to take our country back. If you aren't going to be part of the solution get out of the way and let those of us with the courage to fight for your rights, do so. This isn't about left or right anymore. It's about being an American and doing what's necessary to save this country from the road we are going down..the road to socialism. We aren't the silent majority anymore.
Why use the full retard reference? Okay, we get it about Fox News. Couldn't you have come up with a title that doesn't demean people with special needs while getting your point across?
Totally agree with Bob's point. I don't even need to read your piece, I know it's filtered through the eyes of ignorance just by your horrible, not to mention completely unoriginal, title.
I'll be happy to discuss anytime, email reades@specialolympics.org and let's get to know one another Roy Taylor.
"Retarded" means ignorance, stupidity. When someone says "yo, you're dope" they are not saying you're made of pot. So when someon says something is retarded, they are not talking about the mentally impaired. It's all these eager defenders of the mentally impaired who continue to associate them with the word retard. they should shut it
@M,
The country is not on the verge of revolution. There is a very small minority shouting ridiculous things to drive fear for political gain.
There is a good likelihood that the age of American Empire (as promoted by PNAC and neocons) is over. GB and France anre both post-empire countries, so in this sense, I agree.
How is the government stifling your voice, or your right to PEACEFULLY protest (note: peacefully protesting doesn't require firearms)?
With whom are you uniting with to take your country back from whom? We are all Americans here, at least in the voters booth.
Please define "socialism" because I'm not sure that word means the same thing to me, as it does to you.
@Bob,
The title reference is explained within the piece itself. I don't think it demeans people with a physical mental handicap as I was pointing out that folks with full mental capacity are *acting* like they don't, which is precisely the point of the original coining of the term.
@Ryan,
@Ryan,
Check your email. (previous post got chopped a bit.)
Great story. Unfortunately, I won't be sharing it with people who should read it, because I find the title inappropriate and insulting. "Mental retardation" is still a diagnostic term used to describe a spectrum of disabilities. Don't get me wrong--I will gladly demean Fox News and anyone who watches it without irony. I have found the term "willfully ignorant" a good description. Or just simply "stupid" works well too. But we can slam those who choose to be completely stupid without offending the special needs community.
Got it folks? If you watch Fox News and believe you are getting balanced news coverage, you are choosing to be stupid, which is vastly different from being born with a disability.
Im sure you are good journalist Roy Taylor, hope you learned a lesson here.
No, M, you aren't the silent majority anymore. You are the intellectually challenged vocal minority. No real American is going to advocate or even predict a revolution. I guess you never heard the saying about those who do not learn from history.....you may not claim to be affiliated with either party, but I suspect you to be one of those underground republicans that Rush Limbaugh preaches to. If I for one moment thought you people were in the majority I would head for the hills. Wait, bad idea, my neighbors would be the militia folks. I better just stay put and fight this battle where it belongs, in the voting booth.
A sign of ignorance is using the word 'retard' as a demeaning adjective for your biased hate. Libs make me puke.
Got something to say?
Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!