Muslim Mafia: CAIR exposed in undercover operation

When the Transportation Security Administration announced a new training program -- some may call it an indoctrination program -- that would be mandated for more than 45,000 security officers and supervisors at airports throughout the nation, clear thinking Americans did a double-take. This CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) endorsed training program was billed as "Muslim Sensitivity Training."

Of all the bombshells that the authors of Muslim Mafia have exposed about the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the most explosive revelation -- which aired yesterday in federal court -- shook CAIR to its very foundations.

 

But CAIR the organization, attorneys for Muslim Mafia investigators revealed yesterday in court, legally doesn't even exist. It's not unlike the group's purported goals of protecting Muslims, helping law enforcement sniff out terror leads and upholding the best of American traditions-- all  Muslim Mafia proves to be deceptive shams.

In fitting irony, this comes to light in a court fight that the notoriously litigious CAIR picked to ultimately suppress the First Amendment and silence the damning discoveries that the book documents in intricate detail.

"CAIR is not a valid entity," explains attorney Daniel Horowitz' motion to dismiss in the case filed in federal court in the nation's capital. From there--piece by piece--he dismantles CAIR's case.

Part of the research for Muslim Mafia stems from a daring six-month investigation by Chris Gaubatz -- son of co-author P. David Gaubatz -- and two young ladies. All three pretended to convert to Islam -- he grew a beard, they donned veils -- and landed positions as CAIR interns. In the process, they retrieved 12,000 pages of internal CAIR documents.

Those documents illustrate what the FBI, which severed ties to the organization, and members of Congress already acknowledge: that CAIR is a Saudi-funded, terror-front group that supports Hamas, positions  interns and staffers in key congressional offices, and strives to undermine post-9/11 security.

WND  Books recently published Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America, by the elder Gaubatz, a former federal agent and veteran terrorism investigator, and Infiltration author Paul Sperry. It alerted many Americans that CAIR, which bills itself as the nation's largest "mainstream" Islamic "civil rights" group, fronts not just for Hamas but also Muslim Brotherhood, the parent organization of al-Qaeda.

CAIR disputes the Justice Department designation and condemns members of Congress who, thanks to Muslim Mafia, demanded federal probes of the organization. Nov. 2, CAIR filed in federal district court in Washington, D.C., a lawsuit against the Gaubatzes.

CAIR is seeking punitive damages for trespass, breach of contract, conversion--the unlawful use of someone else's property--and breach of fiduciary duty. But CAIR does not defend itself against the book's claims. And the FBI has served a warrant asking for the same CAIR documents.

Taking Apart CAIR's Case

In 2007, the Justice Department labeled CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist finance case in U.S. history. That’s when the organization changed its name to the Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network. But as Horowitz' motion reveals:

   * Searches on the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs website for the name "Council on American-Islamic Relations" produce no results.

*  *  CAIR" isn't just a convenient shortening of the name. In its suit against popular radio host Michael Savage, its attorneys appeared separately for CAIR and for CAIR Action Network, or (CAIR-AN).

*  *  Under D.C. code, when a nonprofit corporation's articles of incorporation are revoked for failure to comply with certain reporting rules, "then all powers conferred on it are inoperative and it must cease all business activities ... except for those activities necessary for winding up its affairs."

T

T    This further unravels CAIR's case against the Gaubatzes. Claims of breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract are based on its allegation that Chris Gaubatz signed a confidentiality agreement when he began the internship. As Horowitz writes:

CAIR can't produce evidence of any signed agreement

. Even if it could. "this document would have been signed between a non-existent corporate entity and Chris Gaubatz. There need [sic] to be two parties to a contract." 

Horowitz poked more holes in CAIR's case, including:

    *  Claim of trespass -- invalid. The group has not even insisted in its pleading that its premises were private or not open to the public

    * Claims its e-mails are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act--invalid. The law does not apply to office computers at CAIR, but "protects users whose electronic communications are in electronic storage with an [Internet service provider] or other electronic communications facility." 

"CAIR is not a valid entity and even if it were, the exposure of its inner workings is part of the price it pays for being a controversial group in a hotly contested arena," Horowitz says in the brief's conclusion. "If the press or publishers had to prove the purity of their sources before publishing we would never hear about the various romances of Tiger Woods (which might be a relief) but we also never would have heard about Pentagon Papers."

In the well-known case brought by the New York Times against the federal government, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of the press to the Pentagon Papers-- the top-secret Defense Department history of U.S. involvement in Vietnam--because they related to "matters of great public concern," Horowitz argues.

The lawyer who represented Daniel Ellsberg in the Pentagon Papers case, famed New York City lawyer Martin Garbus, also is defending the Gaubatzes. Another high-profile advocate, Bernard Grimm of Washington, D.C., is a third member of the legal team.

 

P. David Gaubitz is a veteran federal investigator and counter-terrorism specialist who served for more than a decade as a special agent in the U.S. Air Force's elite Office of Special Investigations, where he held the U.S. government's highest security clearances -- including Top Secret/SCI (Sensitive Compartmented Information).  He was briefed on many so-called black ops projects. Gaubatz is a U.S. State Department-trained Arabic linguist and has more than two decades of experience in the Middle East, including tours in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, and Iraq, where in 2003 he led a fifteen-man team in extracting the family members of the Iraqi lawyer credited with saving Army Private First Class Jessica Lynch.

Paul Sperry is a fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, and is former Washington bureau chief for Investor's Business Daily, and author of Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington, an Amazon Top 100 seller. The book is being used by top law enforcement departments in the country, as well as the U.S. military. Sperry has broken a number of national stories on the war on terror and other major issues and has been cited and credited by the Washington Post, USA Today, UPI and the Associated Press, among others. In addition, his columns have appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, Houston Chronicle, The American Spectator, and Reason, among other publications. Sperry has appeared on Fox News, CNN, C-SPAN and the NBC Nightly News.