We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 55°F: Current condition: Mostly Cloudy See Extended Forecast

Homeland Security, Defense Departments plan domestic operations?

The Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security recently notified law enforcement agencies and associations, such as the National Association of Chiefs of Police, about the Obama Administration's interest in using the military during "emergencies."

Government officials reported that the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency Administrator W. Craig Fugate met with the Commander of the US Northern Command, General Gene Renuart, to discuss "pre-disaster planning, response and recovery in support of the federal response to the 2009 hurricane season as well as wild fires, floods and other potential disasters."

The meeting reinforced the important relationship between the two organizations and focused on the operational role of US Northern Command and what resources and skills they bring to any major Federal effort related to all-hazards preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation. It was also an opportunity to meet operational leaders who would fill key positions in those support efforts.

"NORTHCOM plays a vital role in disaster response in support of state and local officials," Fugate said. "I am impressed by their commitment to teamwork and interoperability. They are leaning forward and are solutions-oriented partners among the nation's emergency response team."

"We are committed to teaming with and supporting our civilian partners," added Renuart. "If our federal partners, state and local officials are successful in responding to contingency operations, then ultimately we are successful. We look forward to our continued collaboration and cooperation."

However, many law enforcement executives and organizations went on the record saying they did not appreciate the prospect of federal troops usurping the authority of local and state law enforcement agencies or the role of the National Guard unit currently under the control of governors.

"My initial reaction is: why are we allowing federal troops to basically invade the sovereignty of individual states when each state has its own law enforcement agencies and each state possesses an armed and trained National Guard and, in the case of some states such as New York, a trained militia?" according to New York police officer Ed Aquino.

"We have not used armed federal troops in New York since the Civil War when Union troops and Navy battleships attacked dissenters who opposed conscription by the Union Army," she added.

According to officials from the Homeland Security Department, FEMA and Northern Command share a common interest and a unified approach to disaster response and recovery.

"Both organizations also understand that the most effective plans to save lives and protect property begins with preparedness. This meeting was an important stepping stone to ensure mutual preparedness and effective planning in support of state and local officials," said one official.

Homeland Security Department officials offered these two rationales for their joint ventures with the Department of Defense:

"Emergency preparedness is everyone's responsibility. Everyone should have a personal response plan for a disaster, everyone should know who their first responders are at the local and state level, and everyone should be prepared to be self-sufficient for at least the first 72 hours.

"FEMA's mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards."

Political strategist Mike Baker is disturbed over this latest "emergency plan" designed to allow federal troops to operate freely within US borders.

"This is a constitutionally unsound development for our nation. While President Barack Obama and his ilk worry about how America's military is perceived by other nations and are concerned with how we treat enemies, they seem to be willing to use extreme measures against their own citizens. Will we witness another Branch Davidian massacre in the name of 'emergency response' or other rationale? It's not a positive development for this nation," said Baker.

Northcom was established about a year after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and is responsible for an area of operations that includes the United States, Canada and Mexico. It serves as a "one-stop-shopping" point for military support in case of an attack on American soil. However, according to officials speaking during the teleconference, the Obama Administration is expanding that role to include natural disasters or emergencies that were once the domain of state and local authorities.

Over the years, according to Baker, the federal government has expanded its role and even included other nations in operational plans within the US. For example NORAD is a joint US-Canadian command established 51 years ago to defend against nuclear-armed Soviet aircraft entering North American airspace. Decades later, the command's mission has expanded to include early detection of threats via air, space, land and sea. 

The sheer number of participants speaks to NORAD's level of preparation and coordination to operate within US borders.  Teaming up to deal with emergencies are  American and Canadian NORAD agents, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, U.S. Transportation Security Administration, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, NAV Canada, the White House, U.S. Departments of Defense and Homeland Security.

"This is not something we should be celebrating. This is something we as Americans should fear," states another NYPD officer.

"If states do not have the capability to respond on their own to a hurricane or earthquake, then perhaps they should increase their capabilities or change their leadership," said Det. Benny Cardoza.

"Using Hurricane Katrina as an excuse to increase federal authority in the affairs of individual states is a sorry excuse and one that should be shunned by citizens and local cops," states the decorated cop.

For additional information on this subject read:

Why is a U.S. Army brigade being assigned to "Homeland Security"

www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/09/24/army

 

 
Jim Kouri, CPP is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police and he's a staff writer for the New Media Alliance (thenma.org).  In addition, he's the new editor for the House Conservatives Fund's weblog. Kouri also serves as political advisor for Emmy and Golden Globe winning actor Michael Moriarty. 

He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he served as director of public safety at a New Jersey university and director of security for several major organizations.  He's also served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country.   Kouri writes for many police and security magazines including Chief of Police, Police Times, The Narc Officer and others. He's a news writer for TheConservativeVoice.Com and PHXnews.com.  He's also a columnist for AmericanDaily.Com, MensNewsDaily.Com, MichNews.Com, and he's syndicated by AXcessNews.Com.   He's appeared as on-air commentator for over 100 TV and radio news and talk shows including Oprah, McLaughlin Report, CNN Headline News, MTV, Fox News, etc. 

To subscribe to Kouri's newsletter write to COPmagazine@aol.com and write "Subcription" on the subject line.

 

Advertisement

By

Law Enforcement Examiner

Jim Kouri, CPP, the fifth Vice President and Public Information Officer of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, has served on the National...

Comments

  • dbrising 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    American Citizens should see the writing on the wall. This administration has been giving us clues that indicate that Obama is preparing for any possible "event" (even if it is self-made) to declare martial law. IT IS GOING TO HAPPEN! They have been using the media to make it sound as though it would be a "surprise". WAKE UP AND BE READY FOR THE INEVITABLE!!!

  • arclight 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    If the O administration wants to do this, let them first split DoD into two parts. Leave the warfighters at their bases. Use the transportation, logistics, and communications assets to backstop state and local gov'ts by transferring them to state control as required. If the O administration has the courage to do this, great. If not, 'twere best for the DoD folks to stay in their bases. Also, if not, why not???

  • ORION 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    the federal troops would only be used if federalized National Guard units were not sufficient to support local efforts. Would you rather not provide the assistance and create hardship for the citizens in need? We are not a bannana republic where we have to fear an Army take over of our government! The Army is made up of citizen soldiers who would not participate in such efforts.

  • The Heart Beacon 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    After Katrina, the Council of Mayors asked for military involvement (beans, blankets, logistics) at the earliest opportunity. Shifting to collaboration and communications the military leases 80% of its communications from public firms yet applies its network centric strategy to only 20% of its organic communications. What if the military applied its network centric strategy to its entire comms portfolio and help cities on an apples to apples / oranges to oranges basis? Reuse of network centric warfare procedures can be a good thing: Google or Bing or Yahoo: Heart Beacon

  • Redleg 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    This concept of federal support to state and local authorities has merit. The problem however is who is in charge. Federalized soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines share the same interest as anyone in the National Guard when is comes to protecting this country and the lives of its citizens. The military has command and control options we execute everyday which places the control piece to the supported commander. There is a big debate in military circles about having Title 10 military personnel under the control of Title 32 National Guard personnel. We have the organizational tools in place on the military side to make this work. We just need the Posse Comitatus law tweaked to make these relationships clear, and an understanding of employment rules when the federalize military supports the National Guard. We shouldn't shun the resource, we just need to get some smart heads together to figure this out.

  • Redleg 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    This concept of federal support to state and local authorities has merit. The problem however is who is in charge. Federalized soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines share the same interest as anyone in the National Guard when is comes to protecting this country and the lives of its citizens. The military has command and control options we execute everyday which places the control piece to the supported commander. There is a big debate in military circles about having Title 10 military personnel under the control of Title 32 National Guard personnel. We have the organizational tools in place on the military side to make this work. We just need the Posse Comitatus law tweaked to make these relationships clear, and an understanding of employment rules when the federalize military supports the National Guard. We shouldn't shun the resource, we just need to get some smart heads together to figure this out.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...