We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 54°F: Current condition: Overcast See Extended Forecast

America Inspired

Health insurance 101: What is an HMO?


 In 1970 Paul Elwood coined the term
Health Maintainence Organization (HMO)

As the U.S. continues to struggle with the rising cost of health insurance, numerous surveys report that most Americans, both the insured and the uninsured, do not clearly understand the kinds of health plans being offered.

Each year employees are offered health plan choices and asked to make a selection as to what kind of coverage they want. Often, the larger the employer  the more choices to make. But the terminology is confusing and the meanings of terms can change leaving the insurance consumer struggling with understanding how a health insurance plan works.

Let's begin to discuss the kinds of health plans that are being offered in the health insurance market. The kind of plan selected will govern not only the cost but will also define the benefits that will be available to the insured under the selected plan.

Health insurance has a language and terminology all its own. Each of the familiar, but not entirely understood, acronyms has a distinct meaning. We will begin with the most familiar, the HMO.

Before the managed care system took hold in this country, health insurance plans were primarily major medical indemnity plans. Often called 80/20 plans, the insured paid 20% and the insurance company paid 80%. In 1949, Blue Cross maintained 81 hospital plans and Blue Shield had 44 medical plans. Together the Blue Cross Blue Shield organizations covered about 24 million Americans.

The HMO Act of 1973 was signed into law by President Richard Nixon and a whole new vocabulary was born.

HMO  means Health Maintenance Organization. The HMO has changed over the years  As originally conceived is was intended to be a pre-paid insurance plan that offered services at a fixed monthly fee. The monthly charge remained the same no matter what services the insured used.

This was a drastic change from the Blue Shield model which was a “fee for service” plan. An insured would go to the doctor and the doctor would charge a fee for that specific service. Blue Shield would pay 80% of the charge and the insured would pay 20%

One of the earliest HMO models was first seen in 1938 when Henry Kaiser established a prepaid clinic and hospital for the workers at the Grand Coulee Dam project in Washington. By 1942 Kaiser extended the project to include workers at the Kaiser managed shipyards and Kaiser steel mill.

Not to be left behind, Blue Shield adopted its own prepaid plan with participating physicians in 1939.

By 1945 the Permanente Health Plan which had serviced Kaiser employees was opened to public participation in California. Eventually Kaiser Permanente became one of the most famous HMOs to use a facility based design. Medical services, including doctors and laboratories were housed in a single facility. Doctors were paid a salary and patients visited their doctors, had their tests performed and filled their prescriptions all at the one facility.

Today an HMO generally refers to a type of insurance plan that strictly controls the insured’s choice of doctor and hospital. Members of HMO’s must see a primary care physician (PCP)  who is expected to control and direct the care of that insured.

If the insured needs to see a specialist, the PCP will refer the patient to a specific provider. The insurance company that sells the HMO plan also maintains a network of providers who will service patients in the HMO plan. If an insured goes outside the HMO network and sees a provider who is not part of the network, the insurance company generally will not pay for any of the services received.

There are still many insurance companies that sell strict HMO plans. In 2006, it was reported that 67 million members were enrolled in HMO plans. However, by then over 108 million had switched to a PPO.
 

For more info:  A complete history of the managed care system is available at the Managed Care Museum
Advertisement

By

Health Care Examiner

Sheila Guilloton is a licensed health insurance specialist. She works with individuals and small business owners in 9 states, assisting them in...

Comments

  • Fred Hosea 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Every discussion of US healthcare alternatives should make the fundamental distinction between for-profit and not-for-profit models. For-profit models have a built-in requirement to prioritize profits over patient care. Not-for-profit models, like Kaiser Permanente, do not subordinate patient care to stockholder enrichment, or incent doctors to provide unnecessary, expensive procedures to enrich themselves. Surplus income in not-for-profit programs helps keep dues low, and is invested in clinical research, building new facilities, upgrading clinical technologies, maintaining salaries that attract, train and retain highly skilled staff, and in making contributions to community benefit programs. Not-for-profit models are motivated by a desire to provide healthcare. For-profit models are motivated by relenteless demands for profits and desire for personal enrichment of fee-for-service providers.

  • Sheila Guilloton 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Fred

    You are absolutely right. Keep reading. I plan to finish up the terminology of the various plans and also discuss the difference between the for profit and not for profits. I don't think many people focus on that. Most of my clients don't even know there is a difference.
    Thanks for reminding me to include this in this series of articles.

  • Kaiser For Profit 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Fred Hosea should be aware that the Permanente Medical Group, employer of Kaiser doctors, is a for-profit entity. Doctor bonuses are determined by how much expensive health care they are able to withhold. Kaiser is notorious for not diagnosing Lyme disease because of the potentially large expense to treat late-stage and complex cases.

  • Dan 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Kaiser for Profit should be aware that the move for the PMG to a for profit status was a compromise that the not for profit foundation had to do in order to keep the physicians from quitting. Think about how fun it is to keep an a group of tens of thousands of doctors engaged in the mission of proactive health for a $150k a year when their peers are making 5 to 10 times that.
    So, they went to a profit based model, where the docs can earn partnership and share in the monies left over. That's not the same as getting bonuses on denied services. That is simply not true. Don't be a hater.
    Still, the mission of the overall organization is not for profit, and has always been focused on the health of its members first, and sustainability of the organization second.
    Fred does a good job of laying that out below.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...