We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 55°F: Current condition: Scattered Clouds See Extended Forecast

Virginia considers repealing last radar detector ban in America


Delegate Joe May (R - Loudoun & Clarke Counties)

If one veteran Virginia legislature gets his way, the last state to ban use of radar detectors will repeal its ban too.  Delegate Joe May (R - Loudoun & Clarke Counties), Chair of the powerful Joint Committee on Technology and Science in the Virginia House of Delegates has introduced HB 674 to repeal Virginia's radar detector ban. 

According to the National Motorists Association (NMA),

"[d]espite the lack of any positive benefits, Virginia is the only state that bans the use of these common devices. In the past three decades, there were over 100 attempts in 33 states to enact similar bans, but only in Virginia and Connecticut did these misguided efforts succeed. Connecticut repealed its ban in 1992, and it is time for Virginia to do the same."

Delegate May believes that radar detectors tend to cause drivers to slow down.  In a previous Winchester Star interview May rhetorically asked, "Is your objective to keep people in the speed limit, or is your objective to issue citations?" The NMA has an online petition to support May's bill here

Do radar detectors promote public safety?

Radar detector proponents contend that radar detectors often reduce travel speeds, aid enforcement, and promote safer driving.  In fact the1987 "Yankelovich Clancy Shulman Study" appears to support these claims when it found that the accident rate for radar detector owners was actually 23 percent lower than it was for other motorists. 

And American City & County Magazine, “the voice of state and local government since 1909,” reports that

"Since 1991 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has allowed use of unattended radar transmitters to trigger radar detectors and thereby warn drivers of hazards ranging from highway construction zones to road maintenance. . . . At least two studies have shown that drone transmitters capable of setting off the current generation of radar detectors are effective at slowing traffic in construction zones . . . We believe this technology has much untapped potential. Enhanced transmitters, when they are coupled with `smart' radar detectors, will let the driver differentiate between various types of road hazards."

Gun owners are watching this bill
 
And why might gun owners be interested in May's bid to repeal Virginia radar detector ban?  Just peruse news reports and pro-gun web site discussion forums about the issue of traffic stops where drivers and passengers are carrying guns and you'll see why.
 
Even though Virginia and most states do not require concealed handgun permit holders to notify police that they are carrying a gun in traffic stops, gun owners are sharply divided over whether it's a good idea to inform police officers that they armed.  For example, I received a significant amount of online comment criticism (e.g., "Well. I guess all I have to add is...Takes one to know one") of my recent column entitled "Don't be a gun dork in traffic stops" for suggesting that gun owners not inform the police they have a concealed gun unless asked.
 
And gun owners are outraged by the recent Roanoke Times report of police misconduct alleged by Roanoke area motorist Aaron A. Stevenson.  In a federal civil rights lawsuit against Roanoke police officer Officer Jamie A. Kwiecinski, Mr. Stevenson claims that Kwiecinski imprisoned him in handcuffs at the side of the road after the traffic stop was over and the summons for an expired registration was already issued.
 
Apparently due to lack of training or common sense, Officer Kwiecinski never asked Stevenson for his permit but became incensed when the Stevenson refused to answer a laundry list of accusatory questions without an attorney present.  The complaint is here.
 
Ed Levine lives in Loudoun County and supports May's bill.  Mr. Levine has a concealed handgun permit and says he'd like the option to use a radar detector while driving because it might help him stay alert and avoid a speed trap.  And because, Levine notes wryly,
 
"the last thing I want to have on my way to work is a long drawn out discussion with a police officer about the handgun in my car."

 

Advertisement

By

DC Gun Rights Examiner

Mike Stollenwerk retired from the U.S. Army after over 20 years of service to attend law school at Georgetown University. Mike lives in Virginia,...

Comments

  • Mikey 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Ed Levine could always consider NOT SPEEDING as a way of avoiding any police intervention during his commute...

  • Kevin 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Actually, Ed could avoid police intervention by not being stopped for what is a perfectly normal activity (use of a radar detector) in the other 49 states in the nation. That alone would eliminate the interaction altogether.

  • Kevin 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Actually, Ed could avoid police intervention by not being stopped for what is a perfectly normal activity (use of a radar detector) in the other 49 states in the nation. That alone would eliminate the interaction altogether.

  • Jef 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Virginia could also consider raising speed limits to 85th percentile speeeds so radar detectors would not be needed. A 65mph speed limit on a rural freeway is illegally underposted.

  • Derek 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Virginia is a poor state, therefore they enforce absurd speed limits and laws. VA needs to raise their posted speed limits to 75mph, not 55. Va sucks.

  • RSBL 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    The reason radar detectors are legal everywhere else, is that they dont use it anymore, they use lasers and probly MMW radar. But by removing a citizens right to know if they are being scrutinized by the gestapo, they want arbitrary results and you cant fight them without potecting yourself with a detector, at least if it IS safety they are after, they would be happy people when they get hit by radar to remind them to slow down. It seems like they want revenue without impedence instead of safety.

  • Nathan 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Actually, radar is still widely used in most of the southeast. I've been using a detector for almost 5 years and I get almost 30 times as many legitimate threats from radar than laser. The reason being is that radar is usable in all weather conditions, in a moving cruiser, and from behind the windshield. Laser is not. Radar is here ot stay.

  • Snickers 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Radar Detectors are nothing but very simple radio receivers. The FCC rules (Part 15) clearly state that jurisdiction
    of the Airwaves is the sole purview of the Federal Government. There are many reasons for this, interstate commerce issues being but one. Hence, a state has no jurisdiction over the regulating the airwaves and can not enact or enforce law such law.

  • Danny 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Wonder if VA will give back all that illegal money they took?

  • AntiCitizenOne 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I swear to god I was traveling at 75 in a 65 mph zone and the fool clocked me at 77 mph, WTC.

    In other news, VA being the only state that bans radar detectors, that's news to me...

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...