We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 48°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Armed defense at Front Sight: How competent are you?


Front Sight Training Institute provides not only range training, but also essential classroom training on tactics, moral and ethical considerations of using deadly force, and implications for civil and criminal liability. Photo: Lori D. Roets, LazyRPhotography.com

 


Upcoming Articles in 'Front Sight' Series:

  • Armed defense at front sight: How competent are you? (Feb. 11)

  • Armed defense at front sight: Mastering basic handgun skills (Feb. 15)
  • Armed defense at Front Sight: Tactical training/advanced skills (Feb. 18)
  • Armed defense at Front Sight: Who goes to shooting schools? (Feb. 22)

 

 

IMPRESSIONS OF FRONT SIGHT

Few firearm training facilities have as much to offer the many thousands of new gun owners created by the Obama administration as Front Sight Training Institute. Having just completed the school’s Four Day Defensive Handgun course, this four part series will detail the school’s philosophy, what you can expect to learn, and most of all, why you need to go.

Overall, I was impressed. Front Sight differs from other shooting schools I’ve attended, primarily in its lack of “boot camp” mentality. The upside is a friendly atmosphere for a variety of people – including families and upscale professionals – who have relatively little initial training in firearms. Unlike schools where I have shot next to SWAT team members, at Front Sight performance expectations are set at reasonable levels and mistakes are not met with the in-your-face screaming from a drill instructor. To that end, many Front Sight instructors have backgrounds not in the military, but in local law enforcement or as “civilians” trained by the school itself.

A minor downside is that although instructors are extremely vigilant in stressing and enforcing range safety, the relative inexperience of students sometimes makes it challenging to police safety violations such as bending over to pick up magazines before the range is safe, failing to properly clear weapons before re-holstering, etc. With a Range Master, two additional instructors and roving auditors present for all range sessions, however, the school did a reasonable job of minimizing problems.

Front Sight’s family-friendly environment also means that in the interest of keeping training goals achievable for average people, some techniques taught tend to be proprietary or may vary from other schools. For example, after many years of handgun competition, backed up by federal law enforcement training and other schools, I tend to use an “Isosceles” shooting position. Front Sight, on the other hand, adheres to the “Modified Weaver” developed by Jack Weaver in the 1950s and later popularized by Jeff Cooper. As discussed later in the series, the school has reasonable rationale for its practices.

TRAINING FACILITIES

For topics common to all courses (legal aspects, tactics, etc.), lectures are conducted in a large and well-appointed classroom (including audio/video equipment) seating about 500. For shooting exercises, groups of about twenty students are assigned to specifics ranges and instructors. Ours was an outdoor range with shooting positions at 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 yards. Speed and proficiency were assured by using turning targets. Front Sight uses proprietary targets, developed by founder Dr. Ignatius Piazza using x-rays of actual shootings, which feature target zones in the thoracic cavity and cranial-occular cavity. Some exercises used photographic targets to create judgmental shooting scenarios and greater realism in delivering hits.

In addition to a tall berm at the end of the range, safety was assured with cinder block side walls. Range briefings were conducted in a classroom, at the end of the range, sheltered from the desert environment.

FRONT SIGHT DEFENDS SECOND AMENDMENT

Under the guidance of Dr. Piazza, Front Sight distinguishes itself from other schools in its effort to restore the Second Amendment by changing perception of gun ownership in the United States.

As described by Marketing Director and Range Master Wes La Huillier in his introductory briefing and expanded on in a video by Dr. Piazza, the erosion of gun rights has resulted largely from an organized effort by gun control activists and the media to depict gun owners as irresponsible, blood-thirsty rednecks. By exposing media members and the public to the realities of gun ownership, Piazza’s goal is to reverse the erosion of gun rights. Reasonable people can disagree about the potential efficacy of the approach. But given the thousands scared into buying guns under the Obama administration, one has to give him credit for the effort.

ARE YOU ‘UNCONSCIOUSLY INCOMPETENT?’

On day one of the course, La Huillier outlined the “Five Levels of Competence” as they relate to armed self-defense:

  • Intentionally incompetent (II): The individual knows what they lack but, due to laziness or fear of exposing inadequacies, refuses to obtain training.
  • Unconsciously incompetent (UI): Comprising perhaps 95% of gun owners, this group includes those who go to gun shops and buy gun magazines’ latest recommendations, assuming that prepares them for home invasion. These people don’t know what they don’t know. Bear in mind that this category includes not only average citizens, but in some cases police, members of the military and others.
  • Consciously incompetent (CI): People who are aware of what they don’t know and decide to seek help in acquiring firearm skills.
  • Consciously competent (CC): People who have developed defensive gun skills through hard work, but whose skills have not yet become reflexive.
  • Unconsciously competent (UC): Those whose training is so thoroughly ingrained that it becomes reflexive.

Be realistic with yourself: Where to you fall in the Five Levels of Competence? If you read about defensive gun use in magazines and pop off a few rounds at the range occasionally, chances are you don’t know what you don’t know.

Even if you shoot organized competition and can clear steel plates in seconds, have you been trained in tactics and prepared yourself for the moral and legalities of using deadly force? Front Sight excels here, with classroom lectures and exercises including:
 

  • Moral and ethical decisions associated with the use of deadly force;
  • Code of mental awareness and combat mindset;
  • Criminal and civil liability;
  • Tactical movement; and
  • How to select a proper defensive handgun.

Regardless of your background, check out the upcoming series and decide whether Front Sight Training Institute is for you.
 
 

 

 Copyright © F. Paul Valone All rights reserved
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, scanning, digitizing or any information storage and referral system, without written permission from the publisher. For reprint permission, contact: fpv@fpaulvalone.com

 

For previous columns by Paul Valone, go to:
www.GunsPoliticsandFreedom.com
For legislative information, go to:
www.GRNC.org

 
More from Gun Rights Examiners 
Atlanta: Ed Stone  |  Austin: Howard Nemerov  |  Boston: Ron Bokleman  |  Charlotte: Paul Valone  | Cheyenne: Anthony Bouchard  |  Chicago: Don Gwinn  |  Cleveland: Daniel White  |  DC: Mike Stollenwerk  |  Denver: Dan Bidstrup  |  Grand Rapids: Skip Coryel  |  Knoxville: Liston Matthews |   |  Los Angeles: John Longenecker |  Minneapolis: John Pierce  |  National: David Codrea  | Phoenix: Douglas Little  |  Seattle: Dave Workman  |  St. Louis: Kurt Hofmann  |  Wisconsin: Gene German
Advertisement

Slideshow: Front Sight Training Facilities and Range Sessions

By

Charlotte Gun Rights Examiner

Paul Valone is a Second Amendment veteran who directs Grass Roots North Carolina (www.GRNC.org) and who regularly impacts local, state and federal...

Comments

  • MamaLiberty 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    If you look hard at the available history, most people who successfully defend themselves do not have much training at all. More is often better, but nobody should be discouraged if they can only take what is available to them locally.

    There is a 180 degree difference between what ordinary people need to know and what "cops" or military people learn or do. Cops are taught to be aggressive, to chase the bad guy, and generally to attack. This is not only not necessary for the rest of us, it is decidedly wrong and unhealthy. Cops, former cops and military instructors should instruct their own kind, NOT those who want to learn to defend themselves.

    Novices should also NEVER be taught under pressure, and should be in very small groups. Attitude and safety come first. Speed and accuracy come with practice over time.

    I have a "free" Front Sight certificate and offer it to every class I teach. So far... no takers.

  • TexasWiz 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    MamaLiberty - apparently you have never attended Front Sight. I have been there 3 times and never once saw the things you find objectionable. (aggressive, chasing the bad guy, generally to attack) "Novices" (and anyone else) has the option to use non-turning targets for the whole course (thus are only "under pressure" if they decide to be) and attitude and safety are of prime concern. Perhaps you should use the "free" certificate yourself. One thing you do learn there is that the average person attending has the same skills as the "professionals" who attend.

  • Res Ipsa 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    I am a big believer in people getting solid training with firearms. That said, don't do business with FS.

    My experience with FS is that they are a less than ethical organization that relies on massive marketing to push a less than quality product. When you call them on it and ask for a refund, they duck and dodge.

    They took me for $145 on manuals and won't make it right. Don't spend your time or money these people. There are many other honest, quality instructors who will deal with you honestly and ethically. Don't be fooled by intensive marketing, which is what I believe this "article" is, considering that much of the verbiage here is identical to that on FS's web page and marketing letters.

  • Paul 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    To Res Ipsa: Let's make a few things clear. First, this article is written from the objective standpoint of somebody who took the course. I stand to gain nothing from Front Sight. The gun rights organization Grass Roots North Carolina stands to earn $100 --to be directed defending gun rights -- if you sign up for the course.

    Second, no marketing hype has been lifted from FS or anybody else. Where phraseology for TECHNIQUE mirrors what FS teaches, it is for the purpose of describing how they teach a course.

    Third, realizing that FS has been the subject of litigation unrelated to the courses they teach, I am dealing entirely with the course. No pitch was made to the class I attended on anything beyond firearms training.

  • Robert 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    I attended a Front Sight Course with a grandfather and cousin back in 2005. Loved it!! It really did instill a good bit of confidence in my ability to present and fire controlled shots quickly and effectively. The instructors were patient and knowledgable and there were plenty of breaks to address individual questions or concerns.

    I did feel like they had a hard-sell approach to their membership packages, but then again I would have likely bought one had I had the money and lived closer to their facility. I'm still on their email list and sometimes read what they put out.

    Paul, you may be able to tell us; is Piazza still involved in the running of the program there? I thought the court basically "took" the facility from him and put in into trust for the plaintiffs in that case. Yet the emails and marketing still comes in his name. I know that John Wesley, Rawles used to be a big promoter of Front Sight but has since cut ties citing business integrity issues.
    Keep your Powder Dry

  • Paul 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    Dr. Piazza is still running the facility. Pursuant to litigation over land development, Front Sight spent about 7 days in receivership slightly less than a year ago, but has been running normally ever since. They are not doing promotions on real estate development, so I get the impression that part of the operation is on hold.

  • INOV8TN 1 year ago
    Report Abuse

    @ MamaLiberty - Agree with your para #1. I don't think Paul or FS demeaned anyone. I do agree with Paul's assessment that many people don't know what they don't know.

    Re your Para # 2: I agree that the curriculum for LEO's is inappropriate for civilians who won't be shooting unless it's defensively. What FS teaches is defensive regardess of where they recruit their instructors. Finally, the course material is standardized. Every lesson is presented exactly the same way and the instructors are evaluated based on their personal as well as their technical skills.

    I'll take the Front Sight certificate that you have. I've been there twice and I'm planning to go back. I have #3 covered. I'll use your certif for #4 - there's that much to master.

    I hope this helps.

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...