We think you're near Los Angeles

Currently in Los Angeles

Location: Los Angeles Current temperature: 54°F: Current condition: Clear See Extended Forecast

Ohio Senators Brown, Voinovich split votes on historic health care reform bill


Ohio's Democratic Junior US Senator Sherrod Brown
(Photo/John Michael Spinelli)

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Everyone agrees that history was made Saturday evening when the US Senate voted on the controversial health care reform bill, but for Ohio senators Sherrod Brown, a Democrat, and George Voinovich, a Republican, their votes came down to doing what hasn't been done since the days of Harry Truman or to saving future generations for having done so.

Brown was present to vote while Voinovich was not. It is not known why Voinovich was not at the historic session, in light of his strong opposition to the bill.

Reports from the AP said the spectator galleries were full and that applause broke out briefly when the vote was announced. Keeping with the heated tone of the debate over the months, published reports noted that Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused Republicans of trying to stifle a historic debate the nation needed.

"Imagine if, instead of debating whether to abolish slavery, instead of debating whether giving women and minorities the right to vote, those who disagreed had muted discussion and killed any vote," Reid said, according to the AP.

Likewise, the AP said Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Minority Leader, said the vote was anything but procedural, and casted it as a "referendum on the bill itself," which he said would "raise taxes, cut Medicare and create a 'massive and unsustainable debt.,'" themes that would be echoed by Sen. Voinovich.

In the 60-39 vote, Brown, the junior senator elected in 2006, said the vote to open debate on health reform brings the nation "one step closer to making insurance more affordable for millions of Americans."

For Voinovich, who did not vote and who was not in the chamber, the proposed bill "cuts Medicare, raises taxes, increases premiums, hurts states and threatens the health choices that millions currently enjoy," according to a statement posted on his office Web site that added, "This is not reform, and it is not what the American people are asking for. That is why I cannot support Sen. Reid’s health care bill and will not support the vote on the motion to proceed to the bill."


Ohio's Republican Senior Sen.
George Voinovich (Photo/Voinovich
Senate Web site)

But for Brown, who has expressed confidence over the weeks that the bill would indeed include a public option for a government run health exchange that will provide competition to private health insurers, the bill was historic for many reasons. "Passing health insurance reform means that Americans won’t lose health coverage if they change or lose their jobs," he said in a statement on his office Web site. "It means an end to insurance industry practices that limit medical care or charge higher rates to women or individuals with pre-existing medical conditions. We’re one step closer to lowering costs for small businesses and middle class families,”

With the news this week that Ohio's unemployment rate rose to 10.5 percent, Voinovich, known as a deficit hawk but who voted for the tax cuts and war spending of the Bush Administration, said the new health care legislation should first do no harm to the economy. "Sen. Reid’s bill is full of budget gimmicks and will cost Americans $2.5 trillion over the next decade, ignoring the fact that we cannot even take care of our current obligations," he said. "The bill will also raise taxes on Americans by half a trillion dollars while cutting Medicare by nearly the same amount – hurting our nation’s seniors. And, CBO says this bill will increase federal health costs, not lower them like health care reform was supposed to achieve."

Brown sees matters differently. “When it comes to health care, the cost of inaction is too high. This bill will cut our nation’s deficit by $130 billion in the first ten years and will preserve Medicare. It will help keep the insurance industry honest and drive down premiums by injecting competition through a strong public option."

Brown hopes Republicans will choose to be part of the solution. "We have an opportunity to invest in the economic security of American households and the economic competitiveness of American businesses, all while lowering costs and reducing the deficit," Brown argues.  "Americans deserve more affordable and dependable health insurance, and tonight’s vote permits us to move forward toward that goal.”

In addition to expressing concerns for the additional financial burdens he says the bill will bring to Americans, Voinovich noted another reason for opposing the bill. "Additionally, I cannot support Sen. Reid’s proposal because I believe any health reform bill must protect all human life from conception to natural death and am adamantly against allowing federal funding for abortions.”

Follow me on Twitter @ohionewsbureau. Read more stories on people, politics and government in Ohio here.


 


 
Advertisement

By

Columbus Government Examiner

John Michael Spinelli is a communication professional and former credentialed Ohio statehouse journalist. His professional background in economic...

Comments

  • HowRad 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Sherrod Brown is a "progressive" and has never seen a tax he did't like unless of course he had to pay it. If Sherrod Brown thinks this plans is so good why doesn't volunteer to be under starting now? He'll blame it on the rest of the senators not signing on.

  • j.hart 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    "Americans deserve more affordable and dependable health insurance, and tonight’s vote permits us to move forward toward that goal," says Senator Brown. Where is the Senate proposal that moves us towards that goal? The bill currently touted by the Democrats will NOT make health insurance more affordable (unless you trust Sherrod Brown more than the Congressional Budget Office)... unless you count the new entitlement recipients getting free money from "the rich."

    So we can't pay for any of this nonsense - details, details! Progressives at work...

  • Cynthia 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    The Senate already has what is proposed for the rest of us under health care reform. They have a variety of choices at affordable prices. That is what the Democrats are trying to give to the rest of us. What nonsense to say that they will not be under the same plan. They are trying to give us the same choices they have as well as a public option. Theirs is paid for by their employer, the Federal Government. Most of us will have to pay something for ours (the republicans wouldn't have it any other way), but at least we will be able to purchase affordable insurance. My insurance is $918 per month for one person, which is typical if your employer doesn't pick up part of the tab. Health care reform will be a God send to Millions of us.

  • Paul 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    So every Senator showed up EXCEPT Voinovich but people are complaining about Sherrod Brown? I may not agree with his views but at least he shows up to do the work for the job he accepted.

    I HIGHLY doubt this bill is what is needed for our country but hopefully it gets SOME reform underway because doing nothing will not fix our broken system.

  • mekstrand 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    So where was Senator Voinovich. Every other Senator showed up to vote. Maybe it was a done deal but at least show up.

  • Mike Baumgaurd 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    Obama, Reid and Palosi will bankrupt the country
    before this health bill if passed ever kicks in.
    If conservatives don't get control in 2010 I fear
    our Country is doomed.

  • Seth 2 years ago
    Report Abuse

    My favorite line was, "Voinovich, known as a deficit hawk but who voted for the tax cuts and war spending of the Bush Administration"

    Bush's Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit was more expensive than the Democrats' entire health care reform package, yet it created the "donut" of no drug coverage for seniors while making pharmaceuticals the most profitable ever. Why is there always money (and several times more money) for war and tax cuts than there is for suffering Americans? Is being a "deficit hawk" just mean denying assistance for Americans?

Add a new comment

Join the conversation! Log in here or create a new account if you've never registered before.

Got something to say?

Examiner.com is looking for writers, photographers, and videographers to join the fastest growing group of local insiders. If you are interested in growing your online rep apply to be an Examiner today!

Don't miss...